IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both worlds

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Sat, 26 March 2022 10:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6CF23A1276 for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 03:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hZi4p4rKNmnN for <113attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 03:20:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa1-x29.google.com (mail-oa1-x29.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 212043A125D for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 03:20:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa1-x29.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-de3ca1efbaso10420610fac.9 for <113attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 03:20:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ztWma+z6DlsCYlB9BpYkUkEfWaEhWwsrAd//IrBz2cM=; b=IxOY09OF4QJRavUbWTx1LFR/J6IvCtmyM1T0hNzpx8FHkdk+wtIbUDwnsTgqy/uuDt USlhGEczEXypSgJgsX6+yk9vpEQBwK3o5q1LQfm8GMk7pguOvncrNJIHv9XF7MC+YG1Z ltNVt0RRc1tqgzop7EIaUn1qoKdd8bsbBhvZSA8n7rXWGOkytpEz+LMopBjCc43BxT4j bAMvHtEpChCFHCOvc7DUq1vatX/v6Dl6nZsYcYRCbpEAPtfJVc/Odm+qWGV09xRidjEV 83WufzBD1VVm9nTbq8HAwGLGtLs4eskvjGjfBB0UcdKLaBbCbQopzKk9R3fZKJEslgtI 6ZWg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ztWma+z6DlsCYlB9BpYkUkEfWaEhWwsrAd//IrBz2cM=; b=b/U9CDyq1PNjJ5ySiuJc/g/looj9ikFh2XsMbdBJgE/jBo1rTddu29JrplQbGSKEiW fWyN9XkhB8A5MyzIBHixEKgERskv1C9caf1jsRMbSFEQRlgQ4WIz4unglhVdhaqulfrd 96KncNXmmbfuSbNYaoHBd9vVM6WkyrjuUQHGWU4P/pRru9clcb19pQ6iiyg7ycFjHo54 6gV/252tWT2t2kpLxx+Py57wreAwRpwOHo6FwcT/eI79CnVIg8OZ1wP50/86b68UUG6O xVBAtCX0MfOrwVz9NuFYHNG5IlfztgTH9HohN5ZnTePC5fsuseL/d387xCtJ1SuID6I4 LxQg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531T5/vorAgciNp0dIehe4UWK4AQOv3WVou9azLxFJjcVHfnIJre C98Nk3joMohFKZAbWenwVgfvJ2jGpTVEi/CEN5iIlw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxSyzW+ov+oPs6XTybV/tXIrIhn4lpc+gnHdPy7Hfkq1Sc2adPvUzrraA876n9h47q0qMAY2ZcvZc0+dNghRqg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:4582:b0:da:b3f:3221 with SMTP id y2-20020a056870458200b000da0b3f3221mr6598914oao.209.1648290027629; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 03:20:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <91b2da16-46e1-2370-d0f9-786934637c09@sunet.se> <CANk3-ND6Hu5=fPskucoQKOCxAgwXBO9QuhQBoJBky8F5wOwemg@mail.gmail.com> <bcf800fc-2b89-1d9e-eaea-22432efdd4a8@sunet.se> <CAFU7BATNVKDY4xSrT5e-xbqLF98aaBs4yqhVFg-C5s5KG7-XTA@mail.gmail.com> <9f74a494-9e23-4267-8ca2-d7c8b1d3ef06@evequefou.be> <Yj5PDBYZaV/L9ebV@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
In-Reply-To: <Yj5PDBYZaV/L9ebV@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 11:20:16 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1nSX_yJv_E8ZNkkvSHbwVD+RQeL2chyNau1qDBwwq5jdQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Cc: "113attendees@ietf.org" <113attendees@ietf.org>, Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>, Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>, Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>, Wes Hardaker <hardaker@isi.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000095840405db1c6d7e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/113attendees/nTZ02YgDbcRRzztGoNkBoWbECn0>
Subject: Re: [113attendees] hybrid meetings: the worst of both worlds
X-BeenThere: 113attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 113 attendees <113attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/113attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:113attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/113attendees>, <mailto:113attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 10:20:34 -0000

On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 00:24 Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:

> If exactly and only the very same four people would have had lunch
> together via
> gather.town in a privat corner, how much different/worse would the result
> have been ?


In my case at least it simply wouldn’t have happened, since I’ve never
found gather usable, and so wouldn’t have been at this putative gathering.
It would be better to meet via zoom. But that’s the thing: definitely
meetings happened on person that have not been happening for me at remote
IETFs.

Maybe this is because I’m an aged dinosaur, but I suspect it’s more than
that. Better tools might improve this situation, of course. But not gather.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email