Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Fri, 05 February 2010 11:15 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0FD3A6AAE for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 03:15:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.635
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.635 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.071, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2BpabnSMhApF for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 03:15:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (mail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD4C3A6A28 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 03:15:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.25.197.158] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.158]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 515, TLS: TLS1.0,256bits,RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:16:36 +0100 id 00000000005DC02F.000000004B6BFE14.000035CD
Message-ID: <4B6BFE14.4090907@tana.it>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:16:36 +0100
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: asrg@irtf.org
References: <20100204232046.53178.qmail@simone.iecc.com> <23E7BA090191776EB5729804@lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <23E7BA090191776EB5729804@lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:15:51 -0000

On 05/Feb/10 11:44, Ian Eiloart wrote:
> Given that a "This is spam" button should only be reporting to the
> mailstore administrator, it's completely over the top to insert the
> address into every message. The address is a property of the mailstore,
> not the message.

The mailstore where a message resides is not exactly the same thing as 
the MTA responsible for receiving a message, although most of the 
times they coincide.

In addition, there is the sidestepped issue of sending reports where 
the relevant administrative actions can be made. Most of the times 
this is not the mailstore administrator.