Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 16 December 2009 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948AD3A68E3 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:42:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -18.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.045, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AweI4Nqza32T for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:42:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [208.31.42.53]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF973A6833 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:42:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 58989 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2009 18:42:01 -0000
Received: from mail1.iecc.com (208.31.42.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 16 Dec 2009 18:42:01 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=k0912; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=gFTNcSUOlJTh8cbJ1kFcIkXZk9FkzFKZsVPKTYoObSg=; b=WCTWB8oWlWYN9YC4iYCAVg6qQw4Ps5zkMUYRmXzAhbzghaZrYpwZDUjfeSp97cYe49drI6uxvw5ObUsvbNUBstn01zywFBSD/Wlx4+3luyEqcUaQpLr7NXvQzUTn6DzTk6+yYOz9nkY4p7dwU2aioCz05zoaX+FuRgdYlIMTn1k=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=k0912; bh=gFTNcSUOlJTh8cbJ1kFcIkXZk9FkzFKZsVPKTYoObSg=; b=DdKzgD6vYvJ23NHRokWkeWFEzNacG9I1LrsPRCZyboBEbHQgu4+LfjMETyAuKpNmfxwxEGy1terMPlpI9UlAZkfNsrhFDpruEHXAaETWi313Xsqf+v99/Z5kxo0mXVwDXYIbmOZ1oKkV+rpiyw4kAbNPfmMiGv67LWkJQ40kfKU=
Date: 16 Dec 2009 18:42:01 -0000
Message-ID: <20091216184201.23935.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: asrg@irtf.org
In-Reply-To: <4B29141B.2040904@nd.edu>
Organization:
Cc:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:42:17 -0000

>None of these messages should have been reported as spam, but they
>were, and they outnumber legitimate complaints by a wide margin.

You're in the same situation as Rich, a network that doesn't send
very much spam.  If you get so few reports that they're not useful,
none of the ISPs I know will have their feelings hurt if you turn
off the reports.

R's,
John