IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Best list for IETF last calls [was: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org]

Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com> Fri, 07 June 2013 23:02 UTC

Return-Path: <arturo.servin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314BB21F84AF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 16:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wY+J4qQmI9ZP for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 16:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gg0-x235.google.com (mail-gg0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c02::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0F221F84D8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 16:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-gg0-f181.google.com with SMTP id r4so808171ggn.40 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=O7x9PclkEcp/SUzPueIo5SzX5R7y7HC7Ax33r0LNIOU=; b=cqJEswxyjVrXkOHHm824xI2jGe/QsVhreLoMDB6R83/FYQDlIlQVWpFG2ia9OgEyEK Ri+9Eb5w9n5Kjke68uE+MK59C7o3/d3udlIECavjp7c2Lz0p19qNAN+qiJyfHiV/4XVu iYRim1ZsTD8cHF2IeRJ4+OVPF7aj+FncXMdEnFVfX76pHX0kZOyb9PcVsonzjb6iRdi+ 5U8FXY97y1u2nFp+qyVPqG8db097rDyhScq5kh9JiLW4GhsvDbqyjt58En/YS/5m3xmz V/u7xIKLHIz4Fl6up8DmlpfKQra+368DCi49KZav/6E7qqBVh/AIcrurG8UEJehCM/Cp KP3A==
X-Received: by 10.236.201.70 with SMTP id a46mr412656yho.75.1370646150238; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Arturos-MacBook-Pro.local ([2800:af:ba30:df31:c5ef:c620:6c4b:42e8]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v5sm1312012yhn.27.2013.06.07.16.02.27 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51B26680.6030706@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 20:02:24 -0300
From: Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Best list for IETF last calls [was: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org]
References: <201306070453.r574r3Wt010088@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com> <CADnDZ89FjyPtvJQSqY+kmX+1KYkc0jo1mRpOgkfcEnTH6Vbg6A@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751CA462@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <201306071449.r57EnN5N008971@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <CABCOCHSkLj0409hyeqKNdomOdrScYypi_7a1xWqMEUV9eTPuCw@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751CA801@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <CABCOCHR+5M06ToW4jLzALv+FuNHiVbytCGEgkQ3JvG4aUBty=w@mail.gmail.com> <CAK=bVC8ZQ6bZP7V2KWp2Lj3nt-Hd=0camBFqT=ThCKJwqGf0Zw@mail.gmail.com> <51B223C7.2010401@braga.eti.br> <51B23A06.7060402@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <51B23A06.7060402@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 23:02:45 -0000

	I have mixed opinions, filters in general work well (some false
positives like these ones that are moved to my "Last Call" filter) but
in general it is ok.

	But I would not oppose to a new list for LC only.

Regards,
as

On 6/7/13 4:52 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> I think that IETF last call threads should stay on the main IETF
> discussion list. That is exactly the right place for them.
> It's rather trivial to filter them into a dedicated folder;
> I have one called 'lastcallsin', that also picks up most
> WG Last Call threads, although those have less standardised
> subject headers.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email