IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org

David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com> Fri, 07 June 2013 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <dwm@xpasc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CC521F86F5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 09:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W1CD4YNlXzNK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 09:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c2w3p-2.abacamail.com (c2w3p-2.abacamail.com [209.133.53.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1785C21F8887 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 09:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xpasc.com (h-68-164-244-188.snva.ca.megapath.net [68.164.244.188]) by c2w3p-2.abacamail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97363F838 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 16:04:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from egate.xpasc.com (egate.xpasc.com [10.1.2.49]) by xpasc.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r57G4o2S008884 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 09:04:50 -0700
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 09:04:50 -0700
From: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751CA801@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.01.1306070901590.4180@egate.xpasc.com>
References: <201306070453.r574r3Wt010088@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com> <CADnDZ89FjyPtvJQSqY+kmX+1KYkc0jo1mRpOgkfcEnTH6Vbg6A@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751CA462@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <201306071449.r57EnN5N008971@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <CABCOCHSkLj0409hyeqKNdomOdrScYypi_7a1xWqMEUV9eTPuCw@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751CA801@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Milter-Version: master.87-g7939dec
X-AV-Type: clean
X-AV-Accuracy: exact
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:04:58 -0000

As long as the summary has been brought up ...

I've wondered for some time whether the reported bytes is the
whole message I send included context quotes, or if there is
an attempt by the summary logic to factor out quoted
content.

Dave Morris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email