Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Fri, 07 June 2013 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2E821F8FDC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 10:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bCNglFRJt64N for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 10:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ve0-x235.google.com (mail-ve0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464C521F8D0D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 10:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ve0-f181.google.com with SMTP id db10so3217143veb.26 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 10:57:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=WahMR9io3lCyjW1Q/zdxIb+3azvC7GX2faSgjnrRvYw=; b=FEzaed8apP3e+A8m5CJ/JZ5JXKEh/ZIXMy69tJA62YDTS+Iec/XMnrdIbDXpTlvSoA ml11+RbsWxtb8eUSE6M8LhXYku661+KOTSXw5aMbYotDyN6eR24A1n2A/VJU8X6hapr8 ES6hxCRB8FtH3M3HAoFLlOPqlA/UumvBkvrz3TtmbVhiEOHy8yEeyVI0CPEBVhTuoORt HpDhApnayZF4L9gBRstAIgXX++xFwNI5ee9jXHEwOSIykB44dAFROVbh6NbmoIdPTBiT gKFMXX+X5HjqqhyS7EoMTVsdgrMHvsqgfM83LsiHXjSsZgOIyJAiHs1abR2xTQWBkxEa Hbng==
X-Received: by 10.220.188.201 with SMTP id db9mr23707395vcb.30.1370627842669; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 10:57:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.224.219] ([209.97.127.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d18sm50843030veh.6.2013.06.07.10.57.20 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Jun 2013 10:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Subject: Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201306071651.r57Gp9Sf028501@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 10:57:19 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7E35BCF0-B218-4A72-82E3-309320113D6A@gmail.com>
References: <201306070453.r574r3Wt010088@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com> <CADnDZ89FjyPtvJQSqY+kmX+1KYkc0jo1mRpOgkfcEnTH6Vbg6A@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751CA462@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <201306071449.r57EnN5N008971@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <CABCOCHSkLj0409hyeqKNdomOdrScYypi_7a1xWqMEUV9eTPuCw@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751CA801@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <alpine.LRH.2.01.1306070901590.4180@egate.xpasc.com> <201306071651.r57Gp9Sf028501@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 17:57:24 -0000

Thomas,

> From my perspective, the intention/usefulness of the weekly posting is
> to give folk a high-level view of who is posting and how often. It is
> not uncommon to see certain individuals stand out. In some cases, that
> makes perfect sense -- and the signal level is high. In other cases,
> it shows (IMO) people who are too quick to post and who (too often)
> say predictable things if you've read previous threads on the same
> general topic. YMMV.

I agree with your conclusion.  

I also wish that the signal level was higher.  The IETF list is important because we need to have a place where IETF wide issues can be discussed.  That doesn't work if many people unsubscribe due to the the low signal to noise level.  I hope that that people who consistently show up at the top of the posting summary will moderate their behavior.

Bob