Re: Effective discourse in the IETF

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 04 July 2019 00:06 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6FC120096 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 17:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10kPyWKpArau for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 17:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com (mail-pg1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA6E112007C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 17:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id t132so1987276pgb.9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 17:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BuWa6g6Ov/nau89nJpJpvP4+OdQLxidcB4vKmNuNg9c=; b=Nv36Z3MP9+M2Wbha8Bq48LKGWHXoclVDwDCTIO7ZY/LMTM/OnqNGPvG56FuTc17XeN xwdpAVcTAoPyDJBEy+oO1A58yVLJvPVhzM119uC8Hkg1cBwx9roye2qwzZVCDh0F3Ngy 8fOqMD6JlhXHQihDQqOpapsb71zzXLYUoURnDHkSsHIqEXu5NbeqQtDQpwKToRlpXwXO Xxsng6joDhByJ7HlZVNmTRH0/geWtM+XgDL9fMMAewIIIvIHZdkzOPt8e9KTTJUL4LjW c33S5u5mSWWZOK1EeC44ZVGMlpAwzwk2xiwcVr8WSM6COS+mLaUwdyu9KvPhu86gmG6T hM9Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BuWa6g6Ov/nau89nJpJpvP4+OdQLxidcB4vKmNuNg9c=; b=Lg6vzxlMV0+ent6alW6nA7F8Giet51Y8wv0tHscjMZzPTRR5N3nPTNAM0hamORlMT9 dG+28puXnbPq9afxOG07AvXfUOLCZDODqrj6bfxAKLT+Q9ZBvT1pnPSHjAM0mCcDXu6o X/FAKagYGLxpt4njqKacW+woWmjY82w/8aMF39YVPEP6ds68VMKpqWV3hbpaiXS6bwJ+ m3nSi9wUzrJIOD9jPMuK/zSiycUTUVW9kb/xIJmbafkVEPcDd1fghtuCg09IQZeNqJd6 /LRgl5PhTyPh/vPCbSpRQtCJfN80hdZ3r/9scvoJ03lpi1txE/Lv5JuklL8yE9GnTPeP tGBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWLTS1R/xu5pATPLwUyiYAcy23JD6uFi2tPNhRxfpQfuZb9hyAJ TaAN8UDU7zHf7wOxuyoI8WAjB5Og
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqybtWo2QXfUAQwwmsdZS5PT+12DgxpIHRpZ1ABh8o/Gm5Glzrg403pALNfJnotBn/tDDDGWaQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:43c2:: with SMTP id n2mr20517862pgp.110.1562198797971; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 17:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.216.36.147] (sc-cs-567-laptop.uoa.auckland.ac.nz. [130.216.36.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f10sm3633247pfd.151.2019.07.03.17.06.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Jul 2019 17:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Effective discourse in the IETF
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <0D8EF53D-7ADA-4641-A8D0-47FB0BDA9F38@akamai.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <08cf8b9f-afcb-43fb-7d81-8f8b26bf7904@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 12:06:34 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0D8EF53D-7ADA-4641-A8D0-47FB0BDA9F38@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3ut7m25Wv9JJBZU3uMvVmKTiLKo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 00:06:41 -0000

On 04-Jul-19 04:27, Salz, Rich wrote:
> The world has moved on, and that’s a good thing. What used to be acceptable in terms of communication, isn’t; the bar has been raised. If the IETF wants to draw from global membership, it’s going to need to modify (and/or mollify) behavior that used to be acceptable. There is a whole wide world of cultures and genders that can, and should, have something to say about how to make the world better, and **we need to be nice** and **we need to be welcoming.** That doesn’t mean we have to accept poor technical solutions, but we can and should do a better job talking to each other.

I worried about this quite a bit when drafting what became the newcomer guidance on the IETF web site. At the moment it says:

"The IETF is normally very welcoming to newcomers, and tolerance is the rule. The technical level is quite high, so if you write something that turns out to be wrong, you may get some quite frank replies. Or sometimes you will get a reply from someone whose first language is not English, and they can be rude without intending it. (If someone is seriously offensive, the WG Chairs are supposed to deal with it.) Don't be discouraged; everybody started as a newcomer."

Whether that is accurate is of course open to discussion.

    Brian
 
>  
> 
> If you grew up writing RFC’s whose numbers are in the double digits, and you think it’s the same community, you probably need to look around and think again.
> 
>  
> 
> If your personal philosophy is “I am responsible for my mind, just tell me the facts” then please think of others who don’t share your mental discipline and don’t use your admirable self-control as a justification for you to ignore common courtesy to them.
> 
>  
> 
> If you’ve worked with folks for years and stand up at the mic, before saying “that’s really stupid” consider how others in the room might be intimidated from contributing, and how much worse off we’ll be because of that loss.
> 
>  
> 
>                 /r$
> 
>  
> 
>  
>