Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Wed, 03 July 2019 16:27 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 093D81202A3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 09:27:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.419
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.419 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kcp-c12bSo3q for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 09:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-f54.google.com (mail-ot1-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7940A120250 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 09:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-f54.google.com with SMTP id r21so2531532otq.6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 09:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=PEMes2ZwtS2PZne/xkBjD8Gcmt/RajbnE69n5C0QYb8=; b=J4nBmiQ2ZuaIOMKPrIg/ydLYBTaMXhGqx0UVCGHK+FaKPALpH1ir850uGUiaTOicId Efv1O4U0r1PF3C8igXncdf+H+OkOmirTrmWIji99q5sYYs6Bvo/Uhw/z83YoE1pboKEw 1OqBxtHliazgwbNV7bbMfwmLQbO2G2VACY6VPifp+bhKIozHBjfepBg5tUR5fJjZgJ8L orZiK+uFDkUYXybZRli/adZxIHkO8FWP1mjLkpRsAKuKWF5DN7SHRZyc5EGi4BWj8XH5 38QkXvNidAZcnqlLcOmoAhFal/aWn0lRc+wnQsJzXMHfR5ag8d5GshVYAtwXYI5s10/I chNg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXXmyfyWf4Gk77jbB5TPCKD9eZTodeZhvNKaTkzOzBP/3YF0GVC BDc5V2rHpSoThgPip10fuLGwEYV2U6q18uN5bGdPcQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxyQvqkNDEtPKe3pSgNqW8fEK/5w/ohqcrggGAmQmTncQQDBQWJfft/VDGOmmU8Yjbx7U4WegsNz5rfJVbVB3A=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:160c:: with SMTP id g12mr32000493otr.231.1562171272489; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 09:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <34F6E9B8-2BC2-46AC-8AF8-EFDA552D659D@tzi.org> <EA13A490-2636-459F-919B-8A72F4F45174@cable.comcast.com> <df5a6b6c-d444-7e72-dd6c-e2fa844195fa@comcast.net> <20190628214503.GC30882@kduck.mit.edu> <7e5167bf-8167-bf81-981f-662d6da6f1ab@comcast.net> <20190628232206.GC10013@kduck.mit.edu> <e7bf71c3-7842-8699-1f56-36ffa823da99@comcast.net> <20190701223914.GK13810@kduck.mit.edu> <bad99f11-0d66-4aba-72ef-b4b648470753@comcast.net> <34A581FE-BCFA-4FDD-A626-372E036BD79A@cooperw.in> <20190703125524.GB98598@verdi> <B926E8F3-AC7C-4EF0-B433-82513723194A@sobco.com> <3EACBC3B-B559-45DF-B976-6F770096C9B5@cooperw.in> <882E56B9-636B-4E59-A497-DEE0A7F776A4@sobco.com> <m2lfxfun6j.wl-randy@psg.com> <2ec37558-4087-62ad-a552-585de7a65151@comcast.net> <m2k1czumjt.wl-randy@psg.com> <d7abf87a-aeea-8366-2eb1-e03723b00bea@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <d7abf87a-aeea-8366-2eb1-e03723b00bea@comcast.net>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 12:27:43 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwgztWiJ7PM7wQ1f6u5WzbH0-+ApwAtby9DREVU+TxBB5w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation
To: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c671c1058cc95794"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/S95OjbYR32wectdoQRdmGp0DkfI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 16:27:55 -0000

It is probably worth remembering that a lot of clever people can come
together and jointly arrive at an outcome none of them would have advocated
had they been thinking clearly.

One of the problems with voluntary societies is that a lot of people can
end up assuming that they are all in charge of micromanaging the employees.
It happens in local government as well, trying to explain to people that if
you want 'better teachers' then you probably have to think in terms of
improving pay and conditions rather than working out how to sack the ones
you think are bad.

At this stage, I cannot even remember what the technical issues at RFC++
were, I remember the BOF itself quite vividly because of the circumstances.

Given the amount of travel the IETF expects the RSE to do and the fact that
it requires a very skill set different from the one that most of us have,
it is going to be difficult to find people willing to do it. That probably
should have been considered earlier.