IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 27 June 2019 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829A8120112 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RdNWrjnwvmmC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x730.google.com (mail-qk1-x730.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::730]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18E36120198 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x730.google.com with SMTP id i125so2493157qkd.6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=QbN1vRP4cw7Dxn8HoVWhwXQqG+FLrw1555XhqPmlOAw=; b=KnDOUf1EvAOddTygJzBpelD42yC7A5NgqMbyELQagozbeN61iyHrli8yJjKiTSwf9T kFMIr7E2Lf7fq+qoNDjTUzzTux0viAAp8GywXrZP2+3aAJFobaY9tEge64O1OTY01cI8 M026NCC6zI3Wx5y2xoh48LpUs3tbVo+RcPiyYezKMBRR6VbZ9HJoY1Hge3KXayTIzlWT u8i8nHdt9W/vkgg9pEEHuqMdq9VIWEySDJR5aYtDWNOZHJxnstPlmjJZM6h6yk6HWgxj TOk1R3SoU2bbae+z7jCb0yWMm8gBJIXEpnCAwcmfzOZ/JDIGSu+5UBPUn/WlJWW9KtIC CrOQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=QbN1vRP4cw7Dxn8HoVWhwXQqG+FLrw1555XhqPmlOAw=; b=a8w5SxCpEpG+5Knzb/aDBN5CxBiIZU0u0lvlXKM2y2HDlpIS/1VKBjtmsKMHXNCiYX 3qgVBN0NRU1Nc4kDzPc4qKq6AHoVzOKCpgzPFpvFCXBMO8+LoRCSfFy9MnZ9Xrk5cSU/ F5J0rC89G7mZX0meiwg/Tqu/o6V9oIjaxz4YX0R5LlP18LKGxfdt9fGNrlFZxAhXP5yf W6LGaabYTsN/+DUWdjnE6hFdMTUAllb4zMPOq2ejcLzItWw5t4+CP3IngOq86VhlQzRS Ihbh+E2YxlWbbIwIm9YuwHHSk5ZIyEVbmSQxIW6meHbQxapptirfsIZ8tRFfUFU57lE8 wVGg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXNg5TI8ZNbW27BHOPEsDRYir5DFFFjcSf2Nw7cxVMlKZ/kUFDn oEI1NccApvyd4qRfqijMOLnOoHq42WU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqznMH3TeWMOb6pYcLOW87GigyYg+RJGJmwmGigNoYUXmJYVLnQ5bitHMWu8l4oHAt+SD1Ik5Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1335:: with SMTP id p21mr4496048qkj.280.1561657955103; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:470:c1a2:1:f918:eaa3:9962:9796? ([2001:470:c1a2:1:f918:eaa3:9962:9796]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y7sm1151788qkc.60.2019.06.27.10.52.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <DB985813-AA07-4DA0-AF1C-634150F2E22B@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F1406FD5-3B25-4E8C-8E0A-BEA472C4614D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Subject: Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:52:25 -0400
In-Reply-To: <m2ef3e53cz.wl-randy@psg.com>
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
References: <685B34F6-E0E2-4050-B9DD-615F475F62B7@encrypted.net> <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD18D3A5CF@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com> <8CDEE96C-B1DA-4991-B8AA-A2455B705B77@mnt.se> <34F6E9B8-2BC2-46AC-8AF8-EFDA552D659D@tzi.org> <m2ef3e53cz.wl-randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ZBmALVm11E-VmasHbSK8bVf9NKU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:52:41 -0000

On Jun 27, 2019, at 1:45 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> gedanken experiment: should the rse even be directly part of the
> ietf/iab/... process, or be much more independent, e.g. a la the iana?

Is the IANA really independent in the sense that you mean?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email