Re: Effective discourse in the IETF

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 04 July 2019 01:00 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6071206F4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 18:00:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IDn42LFL3jAW for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 18:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5F451206D6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 18:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3DD38192; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 20:58:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3040BB7; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 21:00:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Effective discourse in the IETF
In-Reply-To: <4dbbb30e-40e3-890c-d38e-b1118b8c264a@network-heretics.com>
References: <20190628232206.GC10013@kduck.mit.edu> <20190701223914.GK13810@kduck.mit.edu> <bad99f11-0d66-4aba-72ef-b4b648470753@comcast.net> <34A581FE-BCFA-4FDD-A626-372E036BD79A@cooperw.in> <20190703125524.GB98598@verdi> <c24b3857-fa3e-46a9-f55b-dd160250f290@acm.org> <2807ff5a-7fd3-65cc-5574-ae05df6c622c@acm.org> <20190703141309.GX49950@hanna.meerval.net> <F86FDC5A-AF66-492E-A1FC-678486C26065@fugue.com> <20190703151443.GA49950@hanna.meerval.net> <ce29c166-bdb6-c441-8104-632541b1f12d@network-heretics.com> <7acee776-8dce-294c-6261-8d5c65ce46f7@gmail.com> <98d40a67-7cc5-182a-a203-4b1d06c18917@network-heretics.com> <7F0C529A-AEE8-4F13-B9FD-603CBE034E1C@nohats.ca> <b1dc1fd0-f2a7-3a2a-7907-02ec82a9cfb7@network-heretics.com> <0391A115-A766-47B6-BE7C-D6450934595C@akamai.com> <c7f0cd11-ce96-f2a9-9e0d-bb9f03f1bade@network-heretics.com> <A2F008A8-C314-41E2-A6DE-37FFFDFA8111@akamai.com> <762f7594-b4be-b71f-6f26-60c8788c4c6d@network-heretics.com> <246AAB13-CA73-443B-A065-90251FFB2B3B@akamai.com> <4dbbb30e-40e3-890c-d38e-b1118b8c264a@network-heretics.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 21:00:29 -0400
Message-ID: <21999.1562202029@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/6cdiuWbB1gjr2FFXROzxZh2TxrE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 01:00:42 -0000

Someone else wrote:
    >>> If a speaker withholds useful input because he/she perceives it would be
    >>> impolite, or taken as impolite, that impedes IETF's goals.

    >>> If people suppress useful input because they perceive it as impolite,
    >>> that also impedes IETF's goals.
    >>
    >>> If an audience discredits useful input because he/she perceives it as
    >>> impolite, that also impedes IETF's goals.
    >>> Have you seen evidence of that happening?  I haven't.

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> wrote:
    > Yes, I've seen numerous examples of each of the above.

I claim it happens every time we sit through 47 slides of 9pt text crammed
into a 5 minute slot.   The chair failed to communicate with the presenter,
often because they were being too polite.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-