IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Thu, 27 June 2019 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3609120151 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gmhownvfnHu3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D7DA12019D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1hgYeL-00072S-Kl; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:57:33 +0000
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:57:33 -0700
Message-ID: <m2a7e252sy.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation
In-Reply-To: <DB985813-AA07-4DA0-AF1C-634150F2E22B@fugue.com>
References: <685B34F6-E0E2-4050-B9DD-615F475F62B7@encrypted.net> <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD18D3A5CF@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com> <8CDEE96C-B1DA-4991-B8AA-A2455B705B77@mnt.se> <34F6E9B8-2BC2-46AC-8AF8-EFDA552D659D@tzi.org> <m2ef3e53cz.wl-randy@psg.com> <DB985813-AA07-4DA0-AF1C-634150F2E22B@fugue.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.2 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/E5wOXjkEikOhY-kJu7HhSm1LJgw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:57:41 -0000

>> gedanken experiment: should the rse even be directly part of the
>> ietf/iab/... process, or be much more independent, e.g. a la the
>> iana?
> 
> Is the IANA really independent in the sense that you mean?

to be honest, i do not know.  could be my perception.  but good
question.

they run multiple streams: protocols, names, numbers; only one of
which is 'ours'.

but we're down in the details.  i was just trying to jog us out of
assuming that we should follow the same path which has led to a clear
failure.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email