Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation

Alexander Neilson <alexander@neilson.net.nz> Wed, 19 June 2019 03:55 UTC

Return-Path: <alexander@neilson.net.nz>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FABC12034A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 20:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=neilson.net.nz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g5oPskInw7l4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 20:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C31E81202F1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 20:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id q10so8888408pff.9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 20:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=neilson.net.nz; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=o8ruyG2A4wQAsGPw3qm+NGj9mWzQDLSWWBi6+fbjA+M=; b=axw9kUFueedah/BUlMr5sb6OBZRfmAX3F+oELNgwEEefuNtQ8ezaSRXPAW84hbrfFB tkUzchJ+D+vniT4H3BDGRt/rHtbs6+Gj0iKKAonEWrhXo9XdAnMHcbDezJxNnPB/KEoE 9JaMa5CytzFa8SWQp3hXTocZhXbKESpLk+nJpI0Vq/FyLj9W7SO0G6Qv9gM3+ct0V2Bs nd3+O4TBYlQTDJsOfav2gOxNIiw2IkwDcYhTzs/26ou7TwZTk2wcKTlqN2KheiH4x7Q1 H/9v/br3bfh5Bacx5tIwZHmZdQLScro3TrPG6KN67V10i3WJSw82VjGKtjzmLGgc3Lw/ Or9Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=o8ruyG2A4wQAsGPw3qm+NGj9mWzQDLSWWBi6+fbjA+M=; b=HsNkk++5ISD0JgnFtBtE+X/XtGl3dbeUk0XM/dW+WoKEF9XOhmUmtH+jthBdJ4kPPw Yauty3XrpHVvCKjD7L/005nZFihHY4XXQqBPVDEfXQa25esx/9GOSApSyL7YQzgpu9CD rOeUVFchSMt6ErI4EYb9Nb2vwlnVYUG/6ARUPPwwfKFqAIAomXk0C2uibfqCamSdI84x Olsfuclt9KmA3Y2iAY68u4DwJ/aYaYNiL3Cpd1bdsGJhx+P/ijJzIzBieO31Rxkr2+Il SF9njJXkUJ4vSbENbDHlRGvRcMOOpcvhrKyvQMRT4OBuUnqher19I8lFNEHq4uzMJhwj LgAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWvdfHAxNdcyAs5Nnkf/p/SfhdQ9KNhTLgFrsL8vOjCpAskPyCk KVy43hxtajvPbwKPBXxYTKiAoQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyUGvFze50CCy0QTHDC9zJAcNaxxcCJc7wDAA75DkKxFOLahnoeezZKdUw2vkPMLjgrKabRsw==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8dd2:: with SMTP id j18mr53778386pfr.88.1560916516154; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 20:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.8.38] (gl-ex01.internal.gl.co.nz. [45.118.188.115]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a15sm2885003pgw.3.2019.06.18.20.55.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Jun 2019 20:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-CE80D743-F4D0-46E2-A8D2-EF7733230209"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation
From: Alexander Neilson <alexander@neilson.net.nz>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16F203)
In-Reply-To: <58D30A55-FB45-476B-997F-1D9D58E89AE0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 15:55:12 +1200
Cc: Sarah B <sbanks@encrypted.net>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, IAB IAB <iab@iab.org>, IAB Executive Administrative Manager <execd@iab.org>, LLC-Board@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <A24BDAB9-B118-4A8A-A6DF-D2094ABF3E33@neilson.net.nz>
References: <685B34F6-E0E2-4050-B9DD-615F475F62B7@encrypted.net> <58D30A55-FB45-476B-997F-1D9D58E89AE0@gmail.com>
To: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/SUuaz0yI-kQG_R1dBwIAOH7GMuM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 03:55:21 -0000

I may be wrong but I read it as meaning a renewal of the current contract to allow time to refine the process and that new process would be the structure the RFP for a new contractor went out under. 

Regards
Alexander

Alexander Neilson
Neilson Productions Limited
021 329 681
alexander@neilson.net.nz

> On 19/06/2019, at 14:52, Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I’m not sure whether my question below should be addressed to the RSOC, IAB, IETF Exec Dir, or IETF LLC, so maybe one of them will enlighten me.
> 
> Regarding
> 
> Although the RSOC had recommended renewing the RFC Series Editor (RSE) contract for another two years, and then put the contract back out to bid in 2021 expressly for the purposes of refining our RFP process
> 
> I’m wondering what exactly it means to put a contract out to bid “to refine the RFP process”. For example, is someone bidding on the RSE contract supposed to assume they are just providing information and not actually going to be a candidate for the award? (Is that even legal?) Or, should we presume that this is an actual competition for the RSE work? I can’t understand how you can solicit bids for the RSE but say is is just to refine the process. Can someone explain this curious wording?
> 
> If the goal is to replace the current RSE, perhaps someone can explain why.
> 
> --aaron