Re: Effective discourse in the IETF
Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> Wed, 03 July 2019 15:15 UTC
Return-Path: <job@instituut.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E3D1204AB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 08:15:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TqLPImK7N1Af for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 08:15:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-f48.google.com (mail-ed1-f48.google.com [209.85.208.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7556E120497 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 08:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-f48.google.com with SMTP id i11so2474527edq.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 08:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=0t3TFaX25YFnZgARO0H1l0KsqIJ05eTz6/osW221D6E=; b=tBXNdlApHgCUZ2KpDJfR8+S7Lm5ikSbaS+gdFcBMWX7mU+kk87JIWDZP88iCPP30Jl SFYIT99eDbDl8zPQItPaKZfSjM077K9PzzWLxaT6J3LppF/1yKnGVFMq0goOOCSoDJHN OgBeB68aeUrph+wStCNe7TiiE3AMa2GHDdxKIqyfyhKdno8uXR4BIl58wx2+7rXedw8p odmbmwHpy/n37NyBTIq/xI5Rwcz0xiS5sEQHNvO1b1++NBQuJZ6AvS5qpoN9m59QO3RJ DwLBWDmeN/MGgJa6UtGQpn3lj7AGO8tZUcSY1XgYbSv0QWUAXI6fMfusC1MIBU7va3kS 9fRA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUTaZ23Jtv96WX6FiGc/zZR89yPsWuVqQ2R1kxeZqH4OEbGEPXx Yu5uE/Ktg9UXXB5DAT1K+/KccOFS4mgLuA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz4/hZBmoxyCQLALGQIGIWc/xr9mAqMNyHqaJTDSRWYlhIdlao3K6UPeddOvBXV48iXuZAk1A==
X-Received: by 2002:a50:ae8f:: with SMTP id e15mr42886059edd.74.1562166884688; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 08:14:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([2001:67c:208c:10:7826:f19f:7ed6:4c09]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u22sm255528eja.56.2019.07.03.08.14.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Jul 2019 08:14:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 17:14:43 +0200
From: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>, John Leslie <john@jlc.net>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Effective discourse in the IETF
Message-ID: <20190703151443.GA49950@hanna.meerval.net>
References: <20190628232206.GC10013@kduck.mit.edu> <e7bf71c3-7842-8699-1f56-36ffa823da99@comcast.net> <20190701223914.GK13810@kduck.mit.edu> <bad99f11-0d66-4aba-72ef-b4b648470753@comcast.net> <34A581FE-BCFA-4FDD-A626-372E036BD79A@cooperw.in> <20190703125524.GB98598@verdi> <c24b3857-fa3e-46a9-f55b-dd160250f290@acm.org> <2807ff5a-7fd3-65cc-5574-ae05df6c622c@acm.org> <20190703141309.GX49950@hanna.meerval.net> <F86FDC5A-AF66-492E-A1FC-678486C26065@fugue.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <F86FDC5A-AF66-492E-A1FC-678486C26065@fugue.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/pr0r6Wh2E2uwPP63i-bteBA4eKs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 15:15:02 -0000
Dear Ted, On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 10:42:18AM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote: > > When person A consents to receiving communication in a specific style > > from person B, it doesn't mean that person C, D and E who observe the > > communication agreed to person's B conduct towards person A. Perhaps > > Crocker's Rules have value in private communication between consenting > > adults, but not in a public forum. We can't know how conduct in context > > of Crocker's affects person C, D, and E or even discourages them from > > participating. We have to be careful when making assumptions. > > I don’t entirely disagree with you, Job. And yet at the same time > there is an essential problem here, and it doesn’t do to paper it > over. > > Here is the problem: the IETF has long had a culture that is > consistent with what I guess we can call Crocker’s rule. Your observation surprises me, because that has never been my perception. > That is, we tend not to engage in self-censorship. I respectfully disagree, I believe there have been milions of instances where IETFers have deleted and not-yet-send emails because they realized that for one reason or another the message would not positively contribute. > [snip] > > So the question is, is it possible for us to do better? Yes, that is always the question. And I am cautiously optimistic, I believe IETF will not fade into obsolescence because IETF has a unique characteristic rarely is found in organisations: we have the ability to change our process, and we have even have a defined process to guide such process changes! Because we can change ourselves, change our culture, we can adapt to changing circumstances. > Can we do what worked for us in the past, but differently enough that > we successfully include speakers who would be silenced by harsh public > criticism? Even if harsh public critisism has worked in the past, I don't think the approach aligns with our current trajectory where it appears we are now more mindful of inclusivity and acknowledge diversity. > Is there a way to practice Crocker’s rule that doesn’t discourage > participation? In public context, I don't believe that is possible. On a positive note: I believe Marc's reference to Crocker's Rules was an attempt to express openness, a willingness to create space for other people to express themselves. Creating such space is a wonderful thing, but as we operate in public context we have to look for the smallest common denominator, however hard that may be. > The IETF can’t function that way. We have to practice. This is not > a social club. This doesn’t mean that we should be unkind to each > other: we should definitely do our best to be kind. But being kind > isn’t always being nice, and being nice can’t be the standard of > discourse that the IETF follows if we wish to continue to do good > work. I absolutely do not think that "being nice" and "good work" are mutually exclusive, quite the opposite. Some of the best work done was the result of people being nice to each other. I define being nice as demonstrating patience and acting with empathy towards each other. Kind regards, Job
- RFC Series Editor Resignation Sarah B
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Aaron Falk
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Terry Manderson
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Alexander Neilson
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Terry Manderson
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Alexander Neilson
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Alexander Neilson
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Stewart Bryant
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Kyle Rose
- Re: [IAB] RFC Series Editor Resignation Ted Hardie
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Michael StJohns
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Eliot Lear
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Richard Barnes
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Ted Hardie
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation John Levine
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation John C Klensin
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Ted Lemon
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation John C Klensin
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Mike StJohns
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Richard Barnes
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Allison Mankin
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Jared Mauch
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Randy Bush
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Michael StJohns
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Richard Barnes
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Ted Hardie
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Michael StJohns
- RE: RFC Series Editor Resignation Adrian Farrel
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Toerless Eckert
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IAB] RFC Series Editor Resignation Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Leif Johansson
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Leif Johansson
- RE: RFC Series Editor Resignation Roni Even (A)
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Leif Johansson
- RE: RFC Series Editor Resignation Roni Even (A)
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Carsten Bormann
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Stan Kalisch
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Randy Bush
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Ted Lemon
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Randy Bush
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Keith Moore
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Livingood, Jason
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Michael StJohns
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Leif Johansson
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Theodore Ts'o
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Michael StJohns
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Keith Moore
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Theodore Ts'o
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Michael StJohns
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Nick Hilliard
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation S Moonesamy
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Michael StJohns
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Alissa Cooper
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Randy Bush
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation John Leslie
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Scott O. Bradner
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Alissa Cooper
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Scott O. Bradner
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Keith Moore
- Choices or language and tone (was: Re: RFC Series… John C Klensin
- Re: Choices or language and tone (was: Re: RFC Se… Russ Housley
- Re: Choices or language and tone (was: Re: RFC Se… Richard Barnes
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Theodore Ts'o
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Job Snijders
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Keith Moore
- Effective discourse in the IETF Ted Lemon
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Richard Barnes
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Keith Moore
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Richard Barnes
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Keith Moore
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Kyle Rose
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Richard Barnes
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Keith Moore
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Richard Barnes
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Job Snijders
- Re: Choices or language and tone (was: Re: RFC Se… Mary B
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Jared Mauch
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Ted Lemon
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Richard Barnes
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Kathleen Moriarty
- communication styles (was Re: RFC Series Editor R… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Randy Bush
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Michael StJohns
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Randy Bush
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Michael StJohns
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Dave Cridland
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Bob Hinden
- Re: Choices or language and tone (was: Re: RFC Se… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Salz, Rich
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Jari Arkko
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Ted Lemon
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Alissa Cooper
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Keith Moore
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Melinda Shore
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Keith Moore
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Melinda Shore
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Paul Wouters
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Keith Moore
- Re: Choices or language and tone (was: Re: RFC Se… John C Klensin
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Salz, Rich
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Keith Moore
- Re: Choices or language and tone (was: Re: RFC Se… Richard Barnes
- RE: Effective discourse in the IETF Eric Gray
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Randy Bush
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Tim Bray
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Melinda Shore
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Salz, Rich
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Keith Moore
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Keith Moore
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Salz, Rich
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Stephen Farrell
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Keith Moore
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Salz, Rich
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Keith Moore
- Re: Choices or language and tone Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Michael Richardson
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Richard Barnes
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Pete Resnick
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Miles Fidelman
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Keith Moore
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Ted Lemon
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Pete Resnick
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Keith Moore
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Ted Lemon
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Keith Moore
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF S Moonesamy
- RE: Effective discourse in the IETF Eric Gray
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Ted Lemon
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Marc Petit-Huguenin
- RE: Effective discourse in the IETF Eric Gray
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Keith Moore
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Randy Bush
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Ted Lemon
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Ted Lemon
- RE: Effective discourse in the IETF Eric Gray
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Ted Lemon
- RE: Effective discourse in the IETF Eric Gray
- Re: Effective discourse in the IETF Ted Lemon
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Hector Santos
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Hector Santos
- Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation Alexandre Petrescu