Re: Effective discourse in the IETF

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Wed, 03 July 2019 23:49 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A3F120176 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 16:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Qp338tHd5Ba for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 16:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 028A9120173 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 16:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199B62210C; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 19:49:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 03 Jul 2019 19:49:51 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=KgGVEEIqDynofFllnLkRiUN0LHCQZjxZebiTadV8f 7k=; b=IMutbiExtclToDODu0HCO2nQyhmJCGtv8hXooKDJCL0F/2rncHENwJ9mG Fe9HO6XAza3Xo5s+eH3aoa1/G+N7kZnMHvPVepprhGlC8U8fj7oZEGC39xWtGj6h y9HOjPdVBJkBFYs4o23ad22dzqKo3x990+GUvDy+HYMeWy7ORNtI/VH7XHAMp/qj EIGcme/0PAXnHBBnIoKyMYJ+TclMFAhmeeo7YXblpBGcItC4gef2/9nEl/iwma2A xEeurJ3awvKARkpcRtLydWm96yDgGcS2Keoux5ok8/FHv54EdiTLeIuY0OHF5aCl 4rEFx1XZX06+dIXmGnISAcCulZuyQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Hj8dXW2Hk-RY-i1ryAbXctKF07M4hJ53RAeDku9O5PBY0xVPOUvFcw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrfedugddviecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhh ucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqe enucfkphepuddtkedrvddvuddrudektddrudehnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhm pehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvg hrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Hj8dXdWMHd6Ez8dqmi5Uc4r8Vw52iwtRWDpJSLBv3gipgoV137P57w> <xmx:Hj8dXZ5BI2sYhvRVMp-6XDjGzhLSs8rka9KoLVmi_UIrI4gTIctxKA> <xmx:Hj8dXcLtndsHKry6i-6klVSqJqekJtM7rPQvLxG5pUVRMPfhQcas_A> <xmx:Hz8dXeBFhz9M2QiyDsz0_KRD0O1IgPLJO6TzoG-96Xx67RVSG5incg>
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E0A6F80059; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 19:49:49 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Effective discourse in the IETF
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <20190628232206.GC10013@kduck.mit.edu> <20190701223914.GK13810@kduck.mit.edu> <bad99f11-0d66-4aba-72ef-b4b648470753@comcast.net> <34A581FE-BCFA-4FDD-A626-372E036BD79A@cooperw.in> <20190703125524.GB98598@verdi> <c24b3857-fa3e-46a9-f55b-dd160250f290@acm.org> <2807ff5a-7fd3-65cc-5574-ae05df6c622c@acm.org> <20190703141309.GX49950@hanna.meerval.net> <F86FDC5A-AF66-492E-A1FC-678486C26065@fugue.com> <20190703151443.GA49950@hanna.meerval.net> <ce29c166-bdb6-c441-8104-632541b1f12d@network-heretics.com> <7acee776-8dce-294c-6261-8d5c65ce46f7@gmail.com> <98d40a67-7cc5-182a-a203-4b1d06c18917@network-heretics.com> <7F0C529A-AEE8-4F13-B9FD-603CBE034E1C@nohats.ca> <b1dc1fd0-f2a7-3a2a-7907-02ec82a9cfb7@network-heretics.com> <0391A115-A766-47B6-BE7C-D6450934595C@akamai.com> <c7f0cd11-ce96-f2a9-9e0d-bb9f03f1bade@network-heretics.com> <A2F008A8-C314-41E2-A6DE-37FFFDFA8111@akamai.com> <762f7594-b4be-b71f-6f26-60c8788c4c6d@network-heretics.com> <246AAB13-CA73-443B-A065-90251FFB2B3B@akamai.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <4dbbb30e-40e3-890c-d38e-b1118b8c264a@network-heretics.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 19:49:49 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <246AAB13-CA73-443B-A065-90251FFB2B3B@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/TpCh2nVCACc2zn7b5P3qSgcRZIU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 23:49:54 -0000

On 7/3/19 7:44 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:

>>     If a speaker withholds useful input because he/she perceives it would be
>      impolite, or taken as impolite, that impedes IETF's goals.
>      
>>     If people suppress useful input because they perceive it as impolite,
>      that also impedes IETF's goals.
>      
>>     If an audience discredits useful input because he/she perceives it as
>      impolite, that also impedes IETF's goals.
>    
> Have you seen evidence of that happening?  I haven't.

Yes, I've seen numerous examples of each of the above.

>   I have seen things go the other way and people trying to excuse needless impoliteness because that's the best way to get a frank exchange of views.  Baloney.  There are multiple aspects to consider in getting a frank exchange of views, and working to include everyone is my preference.

We appear to agree in the sense that we both want to make sure everyone 
is able to air their views.

Keith