IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 27 June 2019 09:48 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0A8120105 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 02:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ODUMWYI9qBdi for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 02:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C60B812007C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 02:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from client-0057.vpn.uni-bremen.de (client-0057.vpn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.107.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45ZFSr6DcZzySX; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 11:48:12 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Subject: Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <8CDEE96C-B1DA-4991-B8AA-A2455B705B77@mnt.se>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 11:48:12 +0200
Cc: "Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 583321690.197154-52e581aad2b268ed2cef8f25571781b6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <34F6E9B8-2BC2-46AC-8AF8-EFDA552D659D@tzi.org>
References: <685B34F6-E0E2-4050-B9DD-615F475F62B7@encrypted.net> <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD18D3A5CF@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com> <8CDEE96C-B1DA-4991-B8AA-A2455B705B77@mnt.se>
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/TVQksdI31qQh4l4tW_gCM6CdGtw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:48:17 -0000

On Jun 27, 2019, at 08:30, Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> wrote:
> 
> Personally I think accountability has value.

There is a difference between backward accountability (blame assignment) and forward accountability (making sure the mistake is not made again, which implies understanding the mistake and why it was made in the first place).  I agree the latter has value.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email