Re: Effective discourse in the IETF

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 03 July 2019 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C08120373 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 09:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SxJ2pj-twCiD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 09:28:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 793FB120357 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 09:28:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050096.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x63GRRAE024937 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 17:28:18 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=u69wnGMkbaT+l4vltiXpVTCfV2482HyO/T+ppdbJgOM=; b=UeBNKnownOApYCiEZK/ISt+CufRo3ihrmKop+/a8BegHzLxC3BuHjWgl5YBqXAIyXlID 8S93HWUFJTCtoYNlHBoowZbH1vbDMrz6lE4NoHjlxk0CYXivfHGbPEqwvfMkJK3GL7mT 4cVgrbRJcsDuHYyWWvNAcGt1GdyNIAvtREVh9EkdQ+Q9oRFtM26fLUWHLo1KGPQeyilJ nn+bocUbwPm1nYfxaSnFXUCCG0/G/K1uFSOXn6XQAhgoLPsQ9wiTB/GvzZTriRkikdSM J1aQcbeeMhUUpk+S3UC6WWAeVXiUCU0KLqCWIgiHNrhQ5oi/lfQBmq/vQn7rZZmQMT80 jA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18] (may be forged)) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2tg2s5pcx8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 17:28:18 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x63GHQvC026559 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:28:17 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2te3awt6yw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 12:28:13 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:27:28 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.004; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:27:28 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Effective discourse in the IETF
Thread-Topic: Effective discourse in the IETF
Thread-Index: AQHVMbw0Q/CjTR2R2Ua4enh3iaIkgg==
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 16:27:27 +0000
Message-ID: <0D8EF53D-7ADA-4641-A8D0-47FB0BDA9F38@akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1a.0.190609
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.36.81]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0D8EF53D7ADA4641A8D047FB0BDA9F38akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-07-03_04:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=460 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1907030197
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-07-03_04:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=501 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1907030199
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4xNq_wcCcialZThNJjfq3lsVCzA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 16:28:30 -0000

The world has moved on, and that’s a good thing. What used to be acceptable in terms of communication, isn’t; the bar has been raised. If the IETF wants to draw from global membership, it’s going to need to modify (and/or mollify) behavior that used to be acceptable. There is a whole wide world of cultures and genders that can, and should, have something to say about how to make the world better, and *we need to be nice* and *we need to be welcoming.* That doesn’t mean we have to accept poor technical solutions, but we can and should do a better job talking to each other.

If you grew up writing RFC’s whose numbers are in the double digits, and you think it’s the same community, you probably need to look around and think again.

If your personal philosophy is “I am responsible for my mind, just tell me the facts” then please think of others who don’t share your mental discipline and don’t use your admirable self-control as a justification for you to ignore common courtesy to them.

If you’ve worked with folks for years and stand up at the mic, before saying “that’s really stupid” consider how others in the room might be intimidated from contributing, and how much worse off we’ll be because of that loss.

                /r$