Re: Effective discourse in the IETF

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 05 July 2019 05:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3FA1202A1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 22:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5b14SIi9xTDz for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 22:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82c.google.com (mail-qt1-x82c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B40B412025D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 22:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82c.google.com with SMTP id d17so8615989qtj.8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 22:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=xXtawMytmGxIoC1xHHj4HQFUZVySihb5mRhCoiaCId4=; b=ocblIfNOdV0gaZHFv+MzqizGmQmZ0dkg9Do0xW8KTAWPdNSw4RLVYoBRdh94oF5FKY +QPB6DsqrqfkzeQAlsW6JmSDDSjOcgzFomevMqysDvkoevXD4zQaHgyLD43lOzZZU4bs RkPV5Xow9Lr3x1us2FHrd64VNygT3uRpQw3Awb9T2Dp6NpGOXj7g6AQq89jeGoqZP610 /yaqYoYgTtVaRuqxRo1eXF0dcUnhLSFosGe2lnkitg/c3/SG9npLyukj1R8Mq1zM0XA3 TTis8WA3RmXNxqKZL29+QwXw3YfWP0Jgpz1dS2CYsbdoAFlxTiQgGLDWtmZYwwDJY09R fL4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=xXtawMytmGxIoC1xHHj4HQFUZVySihb5mRhCoiaCId4=; b=ei0yoBPb0rCBAxrYDjN8oRDfWN7LmzbogKT7B0MYviWGw/4g3isYjrXH887v+qCygU QRHcgjkno47DxGTMhD1CO3RKPtX3g45nyUPjG1tZDR9o1p62mPo57rMWY2XTSin+YG8T KKYsZtTZbwrrznKHvndi9FfGuw4jDzWEKnWsXcTD/zIVL3yH4c5LxdlWHzXFN12OnST+ S9w9Q+B/gpRtQ++xLe09Akhr86MEqsEpy5CfuH7xshU+10BQ8guZnRwwePnxezUeS11g 9x5k0WVfYrPVDSM+obr/kEVzIU/0ZjFZu/v/UmoU6NUsm9jcgv7EJDFxHTFmfZw1Y/Pe Ntfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWLZ0HVS3nT6XFvNZ+wn/PSYhMv3N9BzoKBW4MZc5brrmaWs3QZ Xol6dZ483hA6U+blEOFMrR+FudSlFsM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxyqLe/xXq2hR5BxXWss7A9r+rd9dtxRnslVsZGjZ0Gh9WaWKV/ReCvo/fZ7Pxlxd73gGgssQ==
X-Received: by 2002:aed:2063:: with SMTP id 90mr1092313qta.307.1562303777621; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 22:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.30.11] (c-73-186-137-119.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.186.137.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j19sm2893293qtq.94.2019.07.04.22.16.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Jul 2019 22:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Effective discourse in the IETF
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16G64)
In-Reply-To: <336BAB07-22C4-42DA-91FC-6B970B681903@network-heretics.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2019 01:16:16 -0400
Cc: IETF Discuss <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AD174FF7-A8C6-4515-A83A-CAAA91985918@fugue.com>
References: <20190628232206.GC10013@kduck.mit.edu> <e7bf71c3-7842-8699-1f56-36ffa823da99@comcast.net> <20190701223914.GK13810@kduck.mit.edu> <bad99f11-0d66-4aba-72ef-b4b648470753@comcast.net> <34A581FE-BCFA-4FDD-A626-372E036BD79A@cooperw.in> <20190703125524.GB98598@verdi> <c24b3857-fa3e-46a9-f55b-dd160250f290@acm.org> <2807ff5a-7fd3-65cc-5574-ae05df6c622c@acm.org> <20190703141309.GX49950@hanna.meerval.net> <F86FDC5A-AF66-492E-A1FC-678486C26065@fugue.com> <20190703151443.GA49950@hanna.meerval.net> <ce29c166-bdb6-c441-8104-632541b1f12d@network-heretics.com> <7acee776-8dce-294c-6261-8d5c65ce46f7@gmail.com> <98d40a67-7cc5-182a-a203-4b1d06c18917@network-heretics.com> <43377a5b-931e-25f2-353b-8fd4a452ea67@gmail.com> <077de81f-6398-5690-4992-72c0b8251d08@network-heretics.com> <a66a328c-3765-85ef-837f-78f90df65275@gmail.com> <c52e7256-6804-ab16-1cc0-b59b0efae631@network-heretics.com> <F8B7949C-9C82-4A15-8B45-0E0B304EB0E5@episteme.net> <e8fa3003-ea36-25be-1e48-14b06284ea2f@network-heretics.com> <BE1E74F6-29DC-4075-B3F7-E22E71CCC5D0@fugue.com> <336BAB07-22C4-42DA-91FC-6B970B681903@network-heretics.com>
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/O_m8ak6y3xzJGg9hfiyWe7LLOIw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2019 05:16:28 -0000

It doesn’t work if you don’t start out with a predisposition to believe that you are mistaken. This counteracts a cognitive bias we all share: that we are correct by default. This is too deeply ingrained to fight with small measures. You have to go to the other extreme.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 4, 2019, at 11:52 PM, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Jul 4, 2019, at 3:00 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
>> 
>> If I were to state a corollary to Crocker’s rule, it is that in order for any useful discourse to occur, each of us has to let go of a very specific idea.  That idea, stated from my perspective, is that “Ted is usually right.” To test this rule on yourself, do not substitute “I” for “Ted.” Make it personal.  Substitute in your own name.  And then say “Ted is usually wrong” (but substitute your name) and see how that feels.  It can be a fruitful exploratory process.
> 
> I think I would say that in order for Crocker’s Rules to work, one must be at least as willing to discover that he/she is  “wrong” (in some sense, including that he/she has failed to take some important case into account), as to discover that he/she is right.  
> 
> I would not personally recommend adopting either a “_____ is usually wrong” or “______ is usually right” mindset, because either approach seems to me to promote a kind of closed mindedness.  I would say try to have an open mind, but if that’s too hard, be optimistic about yourself rather than pessimistic.  It’s easier to learn and take advantage of discovery from an optimistic point of view.  (I say this as one who was conditioned to pessimism and self deprecation from early childhood; it’s very hard to overcome that mindset and realize your potential.)
> 
> (For myself, I am often grateful to learn something that proves me wrong, because the learning is useful; and sometimes find it awkward - almost embarrassing - to be proven right.  But I don’t accept social pressure as a form of proof.) 
> 
>>  Realizing that you were wrong is actually an incredibly good outcome, not bad at all. 
> 
> Certainly agree with that.  Can be awkward or painful but generally good overall.
> 
> Keith
> 
>