IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation

Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org> Wed, 19 June 2019 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <krose@krose.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98969120655 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 07:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=krose.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wHOZf8aYQUa9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 07:34:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb34.google.com (mail-yb1-xb34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA90012063C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 07:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb34.google.com with SMTP id d2so7715797ybh.8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 07:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=krose.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=A7KftyshTCxGO2DI3un6oz0buTNCMVXOFlPVtcC4dRM=; b=EV35Z8XVJI47z2TVCsXCn//umCQvhd8AJwqBvinWi2exVGkqKPcNd4+yIbPvfntfjA TKCLZWz0ZNya8h15uWOiRBVMOxKE4sK/ay5+Tkv4mP/RaiUDbb9LA3hMVr2p5dnwzX5f DDF2RAAPHmYrKzcWZbag7vl9MS6rsJN3k0m+8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=A7KftyshTCxGO2DI3un6oz0buTNCMVXOFlPVtcC4dRM=; b=kOFMoZylgCwfbvy4J5H8XtgVnAu6jJD4e4ICqpgHY+ue3849GP3vs3j/yxuWyw3wCB XM8uxUpUQ/VpVznHd8mH9uzWH6zbAkg3jN9CLU5z21UsE0TRsPUlbuzDy7ledul7tuDS nD0mnW/qlxU6ZCrmUxp2drsf+juMPd8e/fpllRHjJFLCPrLUjGyqDymKFHl2YhYBPLf3 YHccyXyA+N4+APmAUG1fmv7JgS2+H3avRTpUwJjgH7SSOiqJBPARR7Zg5T1a/CeX6JXK rYGUY7AYZrfIcYMz3yRdcRjxAuSDvHZCcrpgX6WGpYOGXpex+8VdMXZQCS3PgY50rSpy gN/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWh8hFehXGj4X9tQi08Jo/Nhg8Ff9/DTwSFpFEJGENTa+RcOs8e YMAMN7ld51JctamXfRSzw5d5dZeS3L1F4QVGvHtfWQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzR9gSgnma9FUOm+J9S4tw/+9GRG7lb1Rto7VfBPke+kZLOcGZ2bXlUKsypntbp+myEgSBMzghqAt9Cch0M150=
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:584:: with SMTP id l4mr58855470ybp.379.1560954871890; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 07:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <685B34F6-E0E2-4050-B9DD-615F475F62B7@encrypted.net> <e9d747d0-a708-7bfa-f090-d0454344e782@levkowetz.com> <cc4c0ed5-dd1b-9eda-a294-e8e7c53ccb09@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <cc4c0ed5-dd1b-9eda-a294-e8e7c53ccb09@gmail.com>
From: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:34:21 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJU8_nV_ReguCcV=pHZYqxH6DNNuqKfVKN7+Sp1sWr1nyaXrcw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Cc: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, Sarah B <sbanks@encrypted.net>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a67f7d058bae20f6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/FDJZpyBJ93lpueZwPFW6Jd-DYro>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:34:35 -0000

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 10:26 AM Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I really do not think that this is a discussion that should take place
> in a public forum like this.
>
> There is much that both parties may legitimately wish to keep private in
> situations such as this.
>

The involved parties are not required to comment, but as this is an event
that impacts everyone at the IETF, this is 100% appropriate for discussion
on this forum. I further guarantee that this will be raised at the next
meeting plenary if adequate explanation for "refining [the] RFP process" is
not offered beforehand.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email