IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Wed, 03 July 2019 14:50 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D0A812040E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 07:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eFVc20-oEP4q for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 07:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22b.google.com (mail-oi1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 780D41203B4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 07:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id w196so2285424oie.7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 07:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nEVC6cIhhPTEozZugwgLAqAM9KhEr1ENtv2f8+hlVr4=; b=JDp6dZBa4QR+jm/e52GOlRmJvkdliPG09CsdJ2Y/t3A+a/W1rffi2HA9CMVPO7mDqz 1e672nz33jl/+IGQi3+vhpVeV0nDXcK8pp+pG7udEVrQbb16Wa4hk8AEWDmMHX+r4B/W 8Lp6Xv+HnENCfGQVaAfLdPAxAifk9T2Rzbq+3yc7I5MmniRtptRbNCJNPa9lryN5eJuC Fm9uR3wMtKRub9LMUuPTwxNn5x3wuy3TlV98CD8i5vvu64z8wQz8SQ9Y5ut/j7qRRX0O C1Pkw1OanQv92Y/gI6k0xNqX2NWIwasS0cFQPwRixPuTWU9sofwKjhFlUY6uYjVXW91Y 0C2g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nEVC6cIhhPTEozZugwgLAqAM9KhEr1ENtv2f8+hlVr4=; b=YLDrBTzfcPemx2JwltmVx3ysUy4pi3Q26KLb0dP2blxPf6n0RRDFh6vq6tZbr2+YA7 tOM/d6EnXcTBj2NiFV0ZL2gUqBDqjuYWklpRcholfyaS/XvsBnBzG4dAKKbotpM6yLkp LSfe3VY+xqo16KswSCspuVemPPfjnz2unffXNv0EvXX7NjkK4EoqOVgAl5Z8jP45F0Xr 0TiQUObvv42P2rRvpoE5A6bebNly4w+qKkJVmyS/1ZA7+BR3N2reYgDoyUX+ouH4H72S 01JYmm/HbTyNutI2ybzE794IBccAXrpIodJnJJx4TaS1czMMW7hM1DyMUnZXBDGxpf+7 mmKQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVUc498SWaSdxVdmI/LFTRDnM0gIG80Ey1E/iIODiIrtgspnQeC X5RpftG3rz9aRLkdzHHhIHuVmEHytbLiTDhLKdw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx48agA4A9kh+4u84x+IidBA3wBk16GL8iGrdx/uQ0mcvvOKU8NhE/31EFTFjkt0ifAR2axDXUq0YW91mG8epI=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:3a03:: with SMTP id h3mr6407766oia.169.1562165415610; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 07:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190628214503.GC30882@kduck.mit.edu> <7e5167bf-8167-bf81-981f-662d6da6f1ab@comcast.net> <20190628232206.GC10013@kduck.mit.edu> <e7bf71c3-7842-8699-1f56-36ffa823da99@comcast.net> <20190701223914.GK13810@kduck.mit.edu> <bad99f11-0d66-4aba-72ef-b4b648470753@comcast.net> <34A581FE-BCFA-4FDD-A626-372E036BD79A@cooperw.in> <20190703125524.GB98598@verdi> <c24b3857-fa3e-46a9-f55b-dd160250f290@acm.org> <2807ff5a-7fd3-65cc-5574-ae05df6c622c@acm.org> <20190703141309.GX49950@hanna.meerval.net> <EC3FDAB0-CC3A-47CD-B87E-828E9A49A9FB@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <EC3FDAB0-CC3A-47CD-B87E-828E9A49A9FB@network-heretics.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 10:49:59 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgTxfy1iN3ANwstwza4i1z1FH16AUP80NjojZ_X1jHFrRA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFC Series Editor Resignation
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Cc: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>, John Leslie <john@jlc.net>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ad9ac3058cc7fa74"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/LSO6dD20m3eJioZaxkkehOHvCXg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 14:50:24 -0000

Nobody is talking about varnishing truth, Keith.  They're talking about
treating fellow contributors with respect.  There's a big gap between those
two ideas.

--Richard


On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 10:42 AM Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
wrote:

> I believe such rules (or something akin to them [*]) are essential to
> productive technical discussion and therefore essential to IETF.  I also
> believe that efforts to prevent people from telling the unvarnished truth
> about a technical mechanism, or a political one, are harmful to IETF in the
> most extreme sense possible.
>
> [*] my preferred version is closer to “Criticize ideas, not people.  But
> criticize harmful ideas when necessary to prevent harm even if there’s a
> risk that people will take such criticism personally. “
>
> Keith
>
> > On Jul 3, 2019, at 10:13 AM, Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> wrote:
> >
> > believe "Crocker's Rules" are incompatible with the IETF process and
> > as such notifications via IETF's communication channels about whether
> > someone adheres to Crocker's Rules or not, don't serve a purpose.
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email