IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider operational input]]

Xipengxiao <xipengxiao@huawei.com> Thu, 28 April 2022 21:37 UTC

Return-Path: <xipengxiao@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A7AC14F746; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:37:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XKgXxJ0eBp6J; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DBB4C14F73A; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml711-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.206]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Kq84543h8z67NZj; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 05:33:09 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml712-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.61) by fraeml711-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 23:37:16 +0200
Received: from fraeml712-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.61]) by fraeml712-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.61]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.024; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 23:37:16 +0200
From: Xipengxiao <xipengxiao@huawei.com>
To: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>, Kevin Myers <kevin.myers@iparchitechs.com>
CC: 6man list <ipv6@ietf.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider operational input]]
Thread-Index: AQHYWPM5d8wAHyEEcUmoJtQTkKsLCq0BHpGAgAAOt4CAAAsgAIAAAkWAgAABEwCAArKmAIAAFUWAgAAFeoCAAAeegIAAI/YAgAArXQCAAAwtgIAAgQWAgAAbkYCAAMgQIA==
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 21:37:16 +0000
Message-ID: <699f556a3eac41179a80d2cc8749a191@huawei.com>
References: <CAM5+tA8WvjvWirxqE6kQ9LQAG0NcpWyCLGVooB=G7gZ9ETb2zQ@mail.gmail.com> <20220424172743.GA218999@fg-networking.de> <CAKD1Yr1v0Tkh+pWD-ts=PL3gZf7Qj6OHW6Cuvj8iGcSSMibjew@mail.gmail.com> <0afe25f5-52b7-a438-0696-cf8b0a83c2dc@gmail.com> <BN8PR07MB70760D9693580F5BDCB61DD995F89@BN8PR07MB7076.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAKD1Yr3Z9wGQ+uiA2WcW00MrOiLyHs+bSoFjHVtrixCi2qp4DA@mail.gmail.com> <BN8PR07MB7076A6456CAB48EF428D6E8695F89@BN8PR07MB7076.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> <65d0d9ac-77fc-c200-09e3-0c3949ca1541@gmail.com> <CAN-Dau2FS99ewfgH8xk-jSJFCnO92CJV9ZC98DUE2UDR7V1Eww@mail.gmail.com> <CANMZLAYbpZBDA8uFnJqfWfWTQ4S9RN4a-DqWe36qzfAfDtXiQA@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau0BjRR2_7xz38DpJsz0Y=Z_8bV5n-=Eh1QUVEDzqVxmaA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=H=eAyRu0JcHnLpZEUizDZ4Kj0VwPu=0nM=Wn+y3Ho1w@mail.gmail.com> <CAM5+tA_4rtSkgEuRUFZ2LYr6i8a7vWeKODYieVARF3RbRvgRww@mail.gmail.com> <BN8PR07MB7076DE3E745CB916FB81879595FA9@BN8PR07MB7076.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> <ADAE42CE-448F-42F5-89BE-692F493E2DC8@consulintel.es> <CAM5+tA_ksJ+agY1tze1-zPHLsgYFgjEYtnuPs+ffZbnRqiHytw@mail.gmail.com> <BAD082DA-0958-4926-B3E5-4E4599A75078@consulintel.es> <BN8PR07MB7076564E50C0DAFBFAB950FD95FA9@BN8PR07MB7076.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAPt1N1ncVkekecS=dBHSR3WtaEMruy55Udxy0WSMGTgbN24pKw@mail.gmail.com> <CAM5+tA8-Zqka-vZ9jRL3wn0dtfuJj0ECx_k9prwyS2ypisaPtw@mail.gmail.com> <FB031B76-7E88-4824-876F-D1A05F8D2215@thehobsons.co.uk> <CAFU7BAST-oNGpy4JvODDsf=8eS69hV8XCi8OgEHBkkoujRN3Rw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFU7BAST-oNGpy4JvODDsf=8eS69hV8XCi8OgEHBkkoujRN3Rw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.48.204.217]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/-VINT4vGF6HKJGS5knuswNSfY5s>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider operational input]]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 21:37:23 -0000

Hi Jen, 

Thank you for bringing this useful piece of information to light.  I hope more people see it:

> PCR DSS 4.0 (published in March 2022) does not mandate NAT for IPv6. The text has been updated.

That said, I very much agree with Kevin Meyer: "If you want more Enterprises participating in the IETF discussions and improving IPv6 uptake, start thinking about meeting them where they are. And to be crystal clear - NAT is where they are and where they will be for quite a while".

My point is, given PCI DSS 4.0 (what Jen wrote as PCR DSS 4.0), we should tell enterprises they no longer need NAT. But if some enterprises still insist, respect their decision.  It's more important to get enterprises to use IPv6 ASAP, than to insist that they use the "right" IPv6 solution.

XiPeng  

-----Original Message-----
From: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Jen Linkova
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2022 12:53 PM
To: Simon <linux@thehobsons.co.uk>
Cc: 6man list <ipv6@ietf.org>; v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider operational input]]

On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:15 AM Simon <linux@thehobsons.co.uk> wrote:
> The IPv6 community needs to engage with this other regulatory community to get them to bring their standard into the 21st century.
>
> As long as the PCI standard effectively mandates IPv4 & NAPT then it’s going to be an uphill struggle.

See my email I sent yesterday. PCR DSS 4.0 (published in March 2022) does not mandate NAT for IPv6. The text has been updated.

--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry

_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email