Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 01 April 2022 00:41 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2ECF3A2060 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:41:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6OxNvF-5iQrV for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x534.google.com (mail-pg1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FCAA3A2064 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x534.google.com with SMTP id q19so1105585pgm.6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=pZkj+Zurz70beJ2iP2OCFI+DsRR6r6w8T74ZoEO4l/g=; b=oJ34DNjjWh63KDmAKDqNnZWV78AAqi7l7629k190rmPO1xXijrcabj2ZiZSQvlxeAh pYWXltoZ4zn4H4u2uQDV/s9qt8ySjbj3OQwb4AB4hEWyAPPyOSxX3CFROX6NDIC3QNnx b+r4YpQiwFU5Dl3/fxPGuTLKZ039kWfXlQCE/F4CBhSXMkGtiW+HZOtfe6AFat4ymzx+ fFJT7iDP+32fyCHIXcWTrPhGmEnwkcERgFRXq4dpXcouof4aAYyA/uQwVkNZ+ExCCUuW 5ydYB52dJba6PnRFVJtKMeMUVcmT2qZEtNvR2MQadVVfMd5h0O4tDA60re2d/KXB6Tgi 1OpQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=pZkj+Zurz70beJ2iP2OCFI+DsRR6r6w8T74ZoEO4l/g=; b=JKdhceoktFX5SD1QabHTEl4Yzm95lg2XkM/9GeY6tBXlNWSP6OqxN7qij+thiMa2CB 1dbJlxg2uU8ZrC/RfD8raZ2qRdTFClW3OxoDAN1GNiLeRNwm/BK5Q2jIVdSib6drUCM3 ZHc3YOWY08VkW+9P5o0sYT9fAImlgtds9tUyMIBTKAwJswfy71d5feKkhE2TN/4DVgXk KCiH+dyyKbmmutXnR/DTUpaLIJqmLAX2arYVKBuilPx6XzM87pwIoWmfgPugEVi8UKt3 ivZqvG9Y2y45EYXBx5nUniUk2LKU7g2abHxbupXEghayvRCK2t44PDrcjCSiOnutI0lN CT2g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530NEj1iPiwL+bD9uozCsVioJdJH+6PAB0lYWj37nkia1bPGN3Dd 6fRngL2grglUIKOwgQeIADt6e/rZyog=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzDkfUATykNx7KElwXyU29OTe2f3cPLyoe/nijnjUVFTgMlZiSvQyhTt0dbTZJumunzeVztUg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:852:b0:4fb:2cf4:a238 with SMTP id q18-20020a056a00085200b004fb2cf4a238mr29778912pfk.51.1648773684080; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:41:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2600:8801:d008:8c00:290e:ebd1:959b:be2b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u204-20020a6279d5000000b004fa58625a80sm658783pfc.53.2022.03.31.17.41.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.80.82.1.1\))
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <d1c5fd30-8ce4-b413-d4c7-60311eaafad8@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:41:22 -0700
Cc: "E. Marie Brierley" <ebrierley@saatvikadvisors.com>, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4F8543AF-187D-4817-B7A7-9BDF51FAD383@gmail.com>
References: <52661a3d-75dc-111a-3f23-09b10d7cb8d4@gmail.com> <A72CDDDB-CDCE-4EAF-B95E-997C764DB2C4@gmail.com> <9175dc32-45c1-e948-c20a-3bcc958b77b9@gmail.com> <YjmJQMNgnJoSInUw@Space.Net> <D75EF08F-6A41-41B2-AFB2-649CBCC1D83E@consulintel.es> <CAPt1N1nRnYUFA=yyJHx6t52yqWbmcd2Tf1H8gQuCZBd3Q3VqJw@mail.gmail.com> <7F4AEB43-4B24-4A21-AE9D-3EB512B98C46@consulintel.es> <8fac4314b8244ba6b33eea68694296d0@huawei.com> <9A13E47B-75D0-443F-9EE9-D2917ACB2D0F@consulintel.es> <CAO42Z2xUG+BXj+VQpajed9aGjH+q-HR7RX7C-T4DsTbouz7xWQ@mail.gmail.com> <db66fe14-4391-b3ca-2219-e435d7e9cb28@gmail.com> <CO6PR19MB54670882EC43B8FEB8BF5666BA1F9@CO6PR19MB5467.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <d1c5fd30-8ce4-b413-d4c7-60311eaafad8@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.80.82.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/C0JvrWt7XiAMBG3kld_AYQ9PVy8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:41:33 -0000


> On Mar 29, 2022, at 9:23 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> A lot of that is of course users deciding not to buy. Does anybody know how to measure how much of it is due to session failure (per IP version)?

I would expect a very large percentage of it is. I can only speak of my own usage, but in my case it's not unusual to look up a potential plane ticket (or other product/service) on several airlines on several sites a long time in advance of actually making a purchase. Every such exploratory access will be a case in which I decided to "not buy" and probably is detected as a session failure by the site(s) I'm visiting.