IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Tue, 22 March 2022 10:12 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C853A3A0B72 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 03:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rbfc-C5apfkC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 03:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 006473A0CE8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 03:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1647943951; x=1679479951; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=6FBl+9b7//jMdba0FhthoIa3rtXDVvv5AB/rj2M/1kQ=; b=IYxtKy65m19i4qo/K/xdgBl8FF7M1f3RQUEJQ0Uh77Bg1xvUAculpdfT 4SrhMQ/rIOmu+/Yw3wQ+PzZ2t7J7Qw/5kxoqDDuRmK1W3a/5kEHqpuE8q DTelpbU59hP0V2GEF6hs84D96kotA4omtx0Y0TZ6DK3tHb4rgDKTeX4fb +Cl7MIc89VfsgS2HVMdPJJTUEhwLg4IjcuQFcctj5ZoTFqORGR8Di7nVe 5UF0WYEaK5TR2/r1w/W2um5Dg8fKRvsMniEkL3HgWckZESrk1TX5cdGvZ TrnN6sZ+iPPE+im5LKmbiR7nVb5yEzjBqEpOu1uPNFz8adcM1YiHRaS2o w==;
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Mar 2022 11:12:27 +0100
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E034375A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:12:27 +0100 (CET)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9981F406DD; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:12:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 96787116211; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:12:27 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:12:27 +0100
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>, v6ops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <YjmhC2mTibDam806@Space.Net>
References: <52661a3d-75dc-111a-3f23-09b10d7cb8d4@gmail.com> <A72CDDDB-CDCE-4EAF-B95E-997C764DB2C4@gmail.com> <9175dc32-45c1-e948-c20a-3bcc958b77b9@gmail.com> <YjmJQMNgnJoSInUw@Space.Net> <D75EF08F-6A41-41B2-AFB2-649CBCC1D83E@consulintel.es> <CAPt1N1nRnYUFA=yyJHx6t52yqWbmcd2Tf1H8gQuCZBd3Q3VqJw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1nRnYUFA=yyJHx6t52yqWbmcd2Tf1H8gQuCZBd3Q3VqJw@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/cCBHa68umhNJ2NKHDjFeaTL0Yvg>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 10:12:38 -0000

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:25:32AM +0100, Ted Lemon wrote:
> Is it really hncp that we needed here?  I think the key tech we need is
> source-address-based forwarding, and babel i think has delivered that.
> Granted, getting that into soho routers is a problem.

HNCP/Babel is exactly what we needed.

IETF bickering delayed that for 3+ years, and the market has sailed - 
there was a critical time window when plastic routers started adding
IPv6 support.  Homenet missed that opportunity, discussing routing
protocol options instead.  Now, plastic routers have IPv6 support,
and vendors see no incentive to add more code.

Feature velocitiy in pastic routers usually is paid for by ISPs ordering
tens of thousands, and I have heard clear voices that ISPs are not 
interested in features that help their customers to do multihoming
with the competition...

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email