IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider operational input]]

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Tue, 03 May 2022 07:03 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0296EC157B3E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2022 00:03:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l-d0-vR0mqRT for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2022 00:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A2F2C14F738 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 May 2022 00:03:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1651561417; x=1683097417; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=OX0YaCSxHKEN+6q2mvt2Pn/lKTSyQauuy8YUoRGUjfs=; b=IZsQ8EyNRLYHRfkNEzdZ4Ssx++w/piOs5unq9s+/QPdBGrg740ZjlXRX G1FGnIO+6bOnEHLEbWIJaET9fF9fYVRlSq0NMvh5Hv8P9WGuhncBGygZ9 d9s8gsP6b7HUsU/p4ogPjlAHUkTXX8IDCrSa2WdSHBgm6XEiMX2+XMK1J OBj1srUJ779EaTG5eD5AzncxSGb819JRVQGaKpB4VJfEQqujzFJmfJSM/ /sVWO37v337E73swuJYOSd59GAboinfJd/kqkUnvan80mW5xtYRiyDpL9 SgoFUYLNhZr1dwKmKKT86Ky62rzG363dpLLwWXXjfyq3mhFK7Xblt3mT/ g==;
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 May 2022 09:03:33 +0200
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB99A4192C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 May 2022 09:03:33 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97ED3406DD; Tue, 3 May 2022 09:03:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 927B81328D5; Tue, 3 May 2022 09:03:33 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 09:03:33 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-11@u-1.phicoh.com>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, 6man list <ipv6@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <YnDTxRS+r6BZDS0L@Space.Net>
References: <CAPt1N1ncVkekecS=dBHSR3WtaEMruy55Udxy0WSMGTgbN24pKw@mail.gmail.com> <CAM5+tA8-Zqka-vZ9jRL3wn0dtfuJj0ECx_k9prwyS2ypisaPtw@mail.gmail.com> <FB031B76-7E88-4824-876F-D1A05F8D2215@thehobsons.co.uk> <CAFU7BAST-oNGpy4JvODDsf=8eS69hV8XCi8OgEHBkkoujRN3Rw@mail.gmail.com> <699f556a3eac41179a80d2cc8749a191@huawei.com> <CAO42Z2wiebCOPmtcEOJ3rOaZEpHE7qFZZTf5KLWybSsL6rOd9Q@mail.gmail.com> <626B2E07.5070601@jmaimon.com> <m1nlQyw-0000F4C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <BN8PR07MB7076EE22F0BFDB2D192B065D95C19@BN8PR07MB7076.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> <m1nlmPp-0000JaC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m1nlmPp-0000JaC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/lnMWsfPThPTYyJ3cPAL9cNQBPMg>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider operational input]]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 07:03:42 -0000

Hi,

On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 08:53:43AM +0200, Philip Homburg wrote:
> So the conclusing seems to be: we have no clue how much enterprise is 
> spending on telecommunications, but because enterprise has a large 
> market cap, it must be important.

My take is something else.  I want to relieve software developers
(like, me) from having to bother with dual-stack, and focus on good
IPv6 support.

For that, IPv4 needs to go away, everywhere...

Yes, I am aware that this is overly optimistic, and most likely no software
that is written today is still around when developers can safely assume
"for IPv4 support, the customers will have to pay extra"...

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email