Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input

[Chongfeng Xie <[e-mail]>]

I think the problem is that there is a gap between enterprises and what IETF is doing, generally, enterprise needs a solution which may consist of multiple technologies, to update their network or system,  but IETF produces many relatively scattered technologies in the form of standards or informational documents.  These standards may be systematically organized in IETF,  but they are not equal to solutions for enterprise, sometimes they touch a specific requirement of enterprise, but in most cases they don’t. In order to attract the participation of enterprises, it is better to arrange the technologies from the perspective and tell the enterprises what advantages IPv6 can bring to them and how to upgrade their network with IPv6. If they feel the output of IETF is close to their network, information system or production, they will have interest to join.

Best regards
Chongfeng




> 2022年3月22日 上午4:33，Fred Baker <[e-mail]> 写道：
> 
> I have thought some about the discussion we had in the V6ops meeting about increasing operational input. Several suggestions were made: add a separate meeting, segregate parts of the meeting, attend the IEPG, use an interim, and so on. One thought that I had was to schedule a meeting at RIPE in May.
> 
> None of these address what seems to me to be a core problem: ISPs are deploying, but enterprise isn’t. How do we get enterprise on board?
> 
> Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways...
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops