IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider operational input]]

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Fri, 29 April 2022 18:03 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A22E4C15EB2E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4m2IVn8OBgcN for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22B38C14F724 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1651255389; x=1682791389; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=LZVegZDu5q381gyTyO7SdY6XfFaATT4rLQTaEWNum9k=; b=GEuP/M+bEqu2xRJp8aTqrtTY65VTLUIN3ZlzTlTFmZ1X6vEjZhWgoJRD QCQkeZ2GJJHe/RT6kX71e1QdhDyT3TYYiR7C078z2S1U+t2HiYMIJxsYy ZP4k/aZXH4TzR7bxQ0nMpcOPYLBasPNYfOFJWiV+KJ/b4lAjCPl1Uk+3X ySqNH4SOKxI2yCMaVbf1A3DE9AVyqXuE6k7lfvUhQWSS1aEz+Us1zIOIa WSipnhYYw0QkSECGcSktGyFPUlIQ7wnNPIFYlg3DyCvjoN2qOjyLPuDtv aIfaQbQddN+ra/5MRfRvB0Pbpd78du6bnG+GO/yys3tUOCxL9zWK6Nm4D Q==;
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Apr 2022 20:03:05 +0200
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E8C41954 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:03:04 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57CA40EB2; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:03:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id D36AF11472B; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:03:04 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:03:04 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: David Farmer <farmer=40umn.edu@dmarc.ietf.org>, Xipengxiao <xipengxiao=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>, 6man list <ipv6@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <YmwoWPB38Pt+EDH4@Space.Net>
References: <BAD082DA-0958-4926-B3E5-4E4599A75078@consulintel.es> <BN8PR07MB7076564E50C0DAFBFAB950FD95FA9@BN8PR07MB7076.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAPt1N1ncVkekecS=dBHSR3WtaEMruy55Udxy0WSMGTgbN24pKw@mail.gmail.com> <CAM5+tA8-Zqka-vZ9jRL3wn0dtfuJj0ECx_k9prwyS2ypisaPtw@mail.gmail.com> <FB031B76-7E88-4824-876F-D1A05F8D2215@thehobsons.co.uk> <CAFU7BAST-oNGpy4JvODDsf=8eS69hV8XCi8OgEHBkkoujRN3Rw@mail.gmail.com> <699f556a3eac41179a80d2cc8749a191@huawei.com> <CAO42Z2wiebCOPmtcEOJ3rOaZEpHE7qFZZTf5KLWybSsL6rOd9Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau1FV-uEkX1S7vOEVxggjcNvUVTmokPAEOiapxPTySN-vw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1mk8Qv1anXohCJaiH0WWn-BkS4mr=ffyF0cCaE7CM314w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1mk8Qv1anXohCJaiH0WWn-BkS4mr=ffyF0cCaE7CM314w@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/BzR1Anss0hfY0i_IqD90pPUwFqc>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider operational input]]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 18:03:13 -0000

Hi,

On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 10:36:56AM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote:
> The difference is that NAT44 made things better. NAT66 arguably doesn???t.

Well, some might disagree on both accords.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email