Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input

Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com> Tue, 22 March 2022 16:48 UTC

Return-Path: <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EA73A0907 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G49c2U461-QM for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:48:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDFA43A09F9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml741-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.206]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4KNHRf4PHJz67dcy for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:45:50 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mscpeml100001.china.huawei.com (7.188.26.227) by fraeml741-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.222) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 17:47:32 +0100
Received: from mscpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.188.26.142) by mscpeml100001.china.huawei.com (7.188.26.227) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.21; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 19:47:31 +0300
Received: from mscpeml500001.china.huawei.com ([7.188.26.142]) by mscpeml500001.china.huawei.com ([7.188.26.142]) with mapi id 15.01.2308.021; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 19:47:31 +0300
From: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
CC: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input
Thread-Index: AQHYPWL+5ay9cZSrXUWG+DzsIaGQi6zKIZgAgAAMoQCAAA6FAIAApH4AgAALFICAABB9AIAAUtEQgAACLQCAAEnGkP//zu8AgAAzNpA=
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 16:47:31 +0000
Message-ID: <82a76edffbc9497891ad4bd1b577dbbe@huawei.com>
References: <52661a3d-75dc-111a-3f23-09b10d7cb8d4@gmail.com> <A72CDDDB-CDCE-4EAF-B95E-997C764DB2C4@gmail.com> <9175dc32-45c1-e948-c20a-3bcc958b77b9@gmail.com> <YjmJQMNgnJoSInUw@Space.Net> <D75EF08F-6A41-41B2-AFB2-649CBCC1D83E@consulintel.es> <YjmgYA2Wee8f2HAY@Space.Net> <27655a220efb416198d11d5652f45c96@huawei.com> <YjnnrPr5zqAkXoLg@Space.Net> <763e5ec7e18c465a8af81a0cd64eb0c4@huawei.com> <Yjn8ZoGlOEynKN4b@Space.Net>
In-Reply-To: <Yjn8ZoGlOEynKN4b@Space.Net>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.81.192.44]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/SaYkFW1dGObzbgbMbddHmDZUGb0>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 16:48:33 -0000

> This is purely a question of RA parameters used by the LTE router towards the LAN.

No. It is not possible to achieve fast convergence by timers.
The current preferred timer is especially big by default,
But it is not possible to put it small enough.
ND protocol change is needed.

Ed/
-----Original Message-----
From: Gert Doering [mailto:gert@space.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 7:42 PM
To: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
Cc: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>; JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>; v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 04:40:27PM +0000, Vasilenko Eduard wrote:
> If Uplink would get a different prefix after 3GPP reconnecting - the host would use the old prefix for up to 1 week (probably 1/2 of the week).

This is purely a question of RA parameters used by the LTE router towards the LAN.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279