IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Tue, 22 March 2022 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA49A3A0BCE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 14:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y8T3zei3n5-E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 14:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A736D3A0BB4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 14:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1647984869; x=1679520869; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=gCbhcgfrOgWpX1J2OLYhfs29EdXmkICKQjiasKjfYUk=; b=VpV4veCftaL5SBdgLogzcSLAHYYuxRlsSUZ+g+/jWVxv8xb5Zu/A/I7a Lh+XqH7Q4tdrp13rWPplm4mAMdM6Jr6K/GVCFyRBfGOIGfg9BkVEXztJK 9rXcTPFakIN483UUQF+Yr3TiYr+va8q0DoywNBskd5oChDe7xryey50XL LsNnx3Cp7mZEJ2B0MRukxX9VtqySSHwp2swHdY+Gn7w+aucNuYZHTOam+ ZdmwuNnvVZA/aQJoQzfALOZ2+5prngmsc1XqAt1RgfOruk5Z56UynHxdB xYNU+6vyh87QU4vS9t+1XixpXRu0YHB5QfwJ5jVC3Cwafv8CYLBYIQr+i w==;
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Mar 2022 22:34:25 +0100
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE40643758 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 22:34:24 +0100 (CET)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC667406DD; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 22:34:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id C5AFE116DBA; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 22:34:24 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 22:34:24 +0100
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Nick Buraglio <buraglio@es.net>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, v6ops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <YjpA4IH/eI5im8DT@Space.Net>
References: <52661a3d-75dc-111a-3f23-09b10d7cb8d4@gmail.com> <A72CDDDB-CDCE-4EAF-B95E-997C764DB2C4@gmail.com> <9175dc32-45c1-e948-c20a-3bcc958b77b9@gmail.com> <YjmJQMNgnJoSInUw@Space.Net> <fd17a91f-68dc-92b5-0544-51aefa1b7f08@gmail.com> <CAM5+tA-Wq5O4pjQ++VZQi-FTKZGMRAW-LFc6O5dPOyox4QZDEw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HUZHwb9DAk79tq4W"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAM5+tA-Wq5O4pjQ++VZQi-FTKZGMRAW-LFc6O5dPOyox4QZDEw@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/pM4t1e9SQd-A7sYnpwpvQoRwIdU>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 21:34:35 -0000

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 03:12:20PM -0500, Nick Buraglio wrote:
> ULA is an operational non-starter in the presence of any dual stacked
> hosts.  Per its design, it just won't ever use IPv6 in any meaningful way

That's just an entry in the gai.conf table, not something unfixable by
protocol design.

> and that time and effort are better served on adding GUA addressing of one
> kind or another.

So how does your solution to "multihoming for 10 million enterprises"
look like, which is less work than fixing ULA preferences?

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email