Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input
"Ackermann, Michael" <MAckermann@bcbsm.com> Thu, 24 March 2022 10:06 UTC
Return-Path: <mackermann@bcbsm.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2E23A176C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 03:06:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=MAckermann@bcbsm.com header.d=bcbsm.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=bcbsm.com header.b=O01obU2E; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=bcbsm.onmicrosoft.com header.b=W1mNK45+
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8-9g5S3PWJpW for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 03:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.z120.zixworks.com (bcbsm.zixworks.com [199.30.235.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ABA03A1773 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 03:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (ZixVPM [127.0.0.1]) by Outbound.z120.zixworks.com (Proprietary) with SMTP id 72DF3C0DBAAE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 05:06:11 -0500 (CDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=ZIXVPM1670e2ded26; d=bcbsm.com; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=DgEYWi3xGghAByVogwry1hC5LscraE29/NFtSM8gwqr4zSKtlsbzxFlm64BTPbwc NOkJop2QXik7oTBCdOoHdoM+90MArUmufUaKYfm+8ix5QEz0fBmDB8Y81TQEA6 NYcFf0esFmbdWSnKwyr8IYEy674Po03YD3LbabpeYPYQY=;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bcbsm.com; s=ZIXVPM1670e2ded26; t=1648116371; bh=TI5BHv6LZMjx7AR2GHIA422qKgpImc9l7FqwGwsllCA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=O01obU2E1d7X8GwuL8qqusZeWDevZO17zYibPgR/0ZqTQfyBYLBlz/dBeyJI2MBnV 6xkOo7kpdg9aKrDJbnSwVN5gfHyj3p3Uk3GZDv082apC5xfXXorM4haD4XIJ0fMX8D iLKFuKm/GwIPq71gwzEx2h4/IPVjApzGNgFBNL9U=
Received: from imsva2.bcbsm.com (inetmta04.bcbsm.com [12.107.172.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.z120.zixworks.com (Proprietary) with ESMTPS id 75DA64183157; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 05:06:10 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from imsva2.bcbsm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5E5FE05C; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 06:06:10 -0400 (EDT)
X-IMSS-DKIM-Authentication-Result: imsva2.bcbsm.com; sigcount=1; dkim=pass(1024-bit key) header.i=@bcbsm.onmicrosoft.com state=0
Received: from imsva2.bcbsm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D818FFE055; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 06:06:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (unknown [104.47.57.169]) by imsva2.bcbsm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 06:06:09 -0400 (EDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=OGrheZ6cQm9QOunYvCsp56nvK1hwMKfAZRLXY7MUm5KFHN/VpTAeEbtTvB0FNJL7dExMVv6aXAtgK7oc6gVRcPLZ2l9eh4Idxfea3YQZlfHFlNgfy2lmeIk0uhj35pL6WB6yRB/tVNQg6HlGaBlcN/DR4mhVn3b9CTq0XkM+VBoQ1yLGaSo3RuWTi1vvzQwBbGDlr6thrm8PbjolXhbb9YFTFgRvrcKecpO8nJ69LFbvYxnnmhIxi5dGhYywKKpnoevWLQMqPWFJ5zI3bTr2bQJSnuI/ZI6BFJsR331IdcykPLv6ldaDgJr+uEJkgH0Q8ZU//r563G1HtMgKLSIbZA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=auVilDMppphZDZhEPxd9PYkVozEShqoUxtucmD+IjY8=; b=dRjUpT7+HllfjssSXzSb95QYfZtiwwxSWr8uhHOCJRQRQCQlza3Pf0mAJw6a/sDrSo9QXjLsvbj3/VkXLQg5PbTWEBZWWnMtYnAIkf8l1MnosjzRQy0O/pHG8492HtZfio4h7F342EdM8CXISuGqgJBY/c7Up3zFPZ03675FBeZtvaLpc9VsTA0hvPDERj4tVQUOox43SePUkRfxjagE6uuRR2cg/tlll7LEVOS+PvDeJawCnLL8Qpf21rqBHchX8E5I/JIewHy3UKe0hGcVJ1Rw6F0PSpl1Tbwos3dq2gmR2N32rd4bL4hZmQvlRz07RIkNtrFmZLk//Ks9/Ea1lw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bcbsm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=bcbsm.com; dkim=pass header.d=bcbsm.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bcbsm.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-bcbsm-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=auVilDMppphZDZhEPxd9PYkVozEShqoUxtucmD+IjY8=; b=W1mNK45+1MTGErgSIPDyp1skCmRj4+tw2jYqdA3kRltKLIn8Q4lbQhQrMOF6Q3EcRV6ios1GqHhZhGeCS9wLjMTRSTGY92qA0UtzeIqjnj9N12j/ZqhhILaCnQ8ViTDyRIO9bnB4beSD5uGf+un/YtPKpANyReARo06ANuTsVjU=
Received: from DM6PR14MB3178.namprd14.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:118::30) by BYAPR14MB2759.namprd14.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:ad::19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5081.17; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 10:06:08 +0000
Received: from DM6PR14MB3178.namprd14.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::fc52:941f:cc00:2dd9]) by DM6PR14MB3178.namprd14.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::fc52:941f:cc00:2dd9%5]) with mapi id 15.20.5081.022; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 10:06:07 +0000
From: "Ackermann, Michael" <MAckermann@bcbsm.com>
To: Paolo Volpato <paolo.volpato=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input
Thread-Index: AQHYPWLxesV8fulCSU6drVXmx0+5BazLVUBggAL0OICAAARXQA==
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 10:06:07 +0000
Message-ID: <DM6PR14MB3178A04B566F1D24571924F8D7199@DM6PR14MB3178.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BE3310F7-692C-46E9-A75B-07C4C3C6476F@gmail.com> <DM6PR14MB3178DB5E4F9560FFE0B13521D7179@DM6PR14MB3178.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <29f35cbabc114386a1d00bf5c4054f6c@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <29f35cbabc114386a1d00bf5c4054f6c@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=bcbsm.com;
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2a345c1c-8490-433c-041f-08da0d7dea56
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR14MB2759:EE_
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR14MB275982933B63731F1A8A7D61D7199@BYAPR14MB2759.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-relay: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM6PR14MB3178.namprd14.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230001)(366004)(186003)(26005)(86362001)(38070700005)(83380400001)(66446008)(122000001)(38100700002)(52536014)(5660300002)(66556008)(8936002)(66946007)(66476007)(55016003)(76116006)(64756008)(508600001)(2906002)(8676002)(6506007)(316002)(7696005)(9686003)(53546011)(110136005)(71200400001)(33656002)(966005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: 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
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: bcbsm.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM6PR14MB3178.namprd14.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 2a345c1c-8490-433c-041f-08da0d7dea56
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Mar 2022 10:06:07.9456 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 6f56d3fa-5682-4261-b169-bc0d615da17c
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: XY3+OXa1oLb3B1Hk6uMN1YufN4uanfC/9bzU3SEEbbxztt75KXlSyZ0N1x5rfSLVic91/I05+MXotmXkH4NVRw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR14MB2759
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-VPM-HOST: vmvpm01.z120.zixworks.com
X-VPM-GROUP-ID: f1d03a4e-dc6b-4042-b080-670833a7bf0d
X-VPM-MSG-ID: f82c27de-d4a8-495a-b120-59c42266e14e
X-VPM-ENC-REGIME: TLS,Plaintext
X-VPM-IS-HYBRID: 0
X-VPM: TLS Sent
X-VPM-TLS-SENDER: vmvpm01.z120.zixworks.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/d9r34joLqXs1Hs5tBWDK98VrsAQ>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 10:06:19 -0000
Thank you Paolo Good comments IMHO. This thread has gotten into topics other than what I thought Fred was asking about, so I stopped responding. I agree with what you say and your ideas for moving this forward. I think this could be important and I would attempt to help in any way the WG or others would like. The warning I would provide is that it is VERY difficult to get enterprises to participate in initiatives such as this. Only one question I have is in regards to your statement about Enterprises are represented at IETF, directly or indirectly. My impression is that directly, not much at all. And if indirectly, means vendors, I do not see that as an effective mechanism for articulating enterprise requirements,(challenges, use cases, preferences, etc). But having made both of those statements I believe that this is largely our own fault for not participating. We all have our reasons/excuses (lack of understanding, money, time, etc.), but I believe all could be addressable, if IETF is serious. I hope they are! Thanks again Mike -----Original Message----- From: Paolo Volpato <paolo.volpato=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2022 5:33 AM To: Ackermann, Michael <MAckermann@bcbsm.com>; Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>; IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org> Subject: RE: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input [External email] I go back to the initial question posed by Fred and discussed by Michael here below (and echoed by others in the thread). Personally, I agree with what Michael says and this is also one of the conclusions I would draw from the analysis done in draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment. Enterprises, whatever we mean by that term and with the due exceptions, don't care about IPv6, unless it supports/enables their business goals. But I believe that enterprises are represented in the IETF, either directly or indirectly. As discussed at the v6ops session on Monday, if the proposal is to listen to the people who have challenges or are even opposing to IPv6 then we can think of finding room for listening/interacting with enterprises on that. Without discussing here how and where, Fred's idea to have a meeting at the next RIPE could be a first step (and if accepted I would be happy to give support). I am pretty sure that the contributions we may collect as a WG could be the subject of an operational draft. BR Paolo -----Original Message----- From: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Ackermann, Michael Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 2:13 PM To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>; IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Good question Fred. As one of those enterprises "Dragging their heels" on IPv6, and knowing MANY others in the same state, I believe the following are the core issues: 1. Lack of technical knowledge regarding IPv6 implementation and operation. 2. Lack of understanding of compelling reason(s) to deploy IPv6. Both Technical and Business reasons. There is progress in both areas, but definitely not enough and results are slow (or worse). Another area that COULD be compelling is to highlight what issues may be faced if an Org stays on IPv4 only, for either the short or long term Any help, guidance or info regarding either of the above would be helpful and appreciated. The best methods for doing this is a probably a longer discussion(s), so I will not attempt to address related details in this email. But I do believe this is any topic which warrants attention and would glad to contribute, if I can. Thanks Mike -----Original Message----- From: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Fred Baker Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 4:33 PM To: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org> Subject: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input [External email] I have thought some about the discussion we had in the V6ops meeting about increasing operational input. Several suggestions were made: add a separate meeting, segregate parts of the meeting, attend the IEPG, use an interim, and so on. One thought that I had was to schedule a meeting at RIPE in May. None of these address what seems to me to be a core problem: ISPs are deploying, but enterprise isn’t. How do we get enterprise on board? Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways... _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops The information contained in this communication is highly confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom this communication is directed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended receipt and delete the original message without making any copies. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Blue Care Network of Michigan are nonprofit corporations and independent licensees of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. This message was secured by Zix(R). _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops The information contained in this communication is highly confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom this communication is directed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended receipt and delete the original message without making any copies. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Blue Care Network of Michigan are nonprofit corporations and independent licensees of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. This message was secured by Zix(R).
- [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Bob Hinden
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Bjoern A. Zeeb
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Toerless Eckert
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Xipengxiao
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Toerless Eckert
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Toerless Eckert
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Simon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gyan Mishra
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gyan Mishra
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input hsyu
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Scott Morizot
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Daniel Woititz
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Paolo Volpato
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Philipp S. Tiesel
- [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider oper… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Paolo Volpato
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Bob Hinden
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Paolo Volpato
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nalini J Elkins
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Xipengxiao
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input E. Marie Brierley
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input E. Marie Brierley
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input E. Marie Brierley
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Philipp S. Tiesel
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Simon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Simon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input otroan
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Simon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Simon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Simon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Xipengxiao
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input David Conrad
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input David Conrad
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Simon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Greg Skinner
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Chris Cummings
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input daveb
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Erik Auerswald
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Kevin Myers
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Kevin Myers
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Erik Auerswald
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Erik Auerswald
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Brian Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Erik Auerswald
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Erik Auerswald
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Erik Auerswald
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … otroan
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Erik Auerswald
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Erik Auerswald
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … otroan
- [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoughts … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… David Farmer
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Brian Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… David Farmer
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… George Michaelson
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Kevin Myers
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Kevin Myers
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Kevin Myers
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Erik Auerswald
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Simon
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Simon
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Kevin Myers
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Kevin Myers
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Xipengxiao
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Havard Eidnes
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… David Farmer
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Ed Horley
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Michael Sweet
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Kevin Myers
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… David Farmer
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… David Farmer
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… David Farmer
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Ed Horley
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Kevin Myers
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Kevin Myers
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Ed Horley
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… David Farmer
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Erik Auerswald
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Ed Horley
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Georgi Stoev
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Brian E Carpenter