IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider operational input]]

Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Thu, 28 April 2022 10:53 UTC

Return-Path: <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E39C14F74A; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 03:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MQi4BqRW6rkU; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 03:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62a.google.com (mail-ej1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69805C14F741; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 03:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id kq17so8764975ejb.4; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 03:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9Iyw8U43MT6Wbeim125za0F1JVJlvjM277ObM6294DM=; b=HVGYQDFCxXbwG0vy7peUFkn6fTJJhvFRoUwwfS4W18liFGItIpviCt/MfWGN/UYIlf iQmgoKWBPsNeDnZjJJGH3eB/IacUZDV5x/bfVORB3eJBqiFG+7g3VmHKMwNrG8bK22uj vKKZQSJH/vgfnmzgyZWwHE7aTgzWfYeSy6PFG9UzdfIaX976zaQjvBTiSnZqqdlSm8I4 f1/Ngz97fna5yzVxxkvYWfVmHIRTgY+zbaSF+S4FolxWqDertZ+TMF0FGfP1anvlnrcR CoTRz12U9NvTWFiV0mRbWGuQhxz3bs+t0Tvi6wvkik+G31eBYd5IhHs7dSPp3xP1Cfj1 5KCg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9Iyw8U43MT6Wbeim125za0F1JVJlvjM277ObM6294DM=; b=t/AGb9LT8+GbHFwcOP8xBgI/6Y1/G1Rm3rk08FZQ907Bo/DlpNXZeU0rhCfEHZj2vH GshN1PDNvRckkVOCS8O+ZZtJL43XxuNxU40L2Y2LpSDxa4gqQ9ZTCcbqe056Pvwf2Vmf 30d90UxfuihMsxIuwPBMLRO5V3GHcYMF6tF0dOIg8dYrJo4AxIzKAhYEu93SO61zGU88 666IOUFrDJRxLZw4x+i70v8Csni1Ic4taUapOXGyxGrSlUJu+i+nO+gVV7i/hAELApBy nk9weLUnWhNXEXfxpizy1WbkHQRShujhT6OxBWWy8txhnWuKn8c+CWM++hD23FRXHKGt /lqg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532uooTdHx793zR97k/wDCmATbSNsMwcPjmBItuQrhgDjP3W3e0S X1tQlvBIluaYixY26nsYRpDKmpWyXXd+iyHJ07Pp7GaD
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyK47Ai00Ynr/by4GMV3XG3CXCM4QDlpTx54kS6J8502si9Bt8ijXc693Gx9uOVL9QVnJYJcr0I1zPktCuvANQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a08b:b0:6cf:65bc:e7de with SMTP id q11-20020a170906a08b00b006cf65bce7demr31709420ejy.220.1651143197469; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 03:53:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAM5+tA8WvjvWirxqE6kQ9LQAG0NcpWyCLGVooB=G7gZ9ETb2zQ@mail.gmail.com> <20220424172743.GA218999@fg-networking.de> <CAKD1Yr1v0Tkh+pWD-ts=PL3gZf7Qj6OHW6Cuvj8iGcSSMibjew@mail.gmail.com> <0afe25f5-52b7-a438-0696-cf8b0a83c2dc@gmail.com> <BN8PR07MB70760D9693580F5BDCB61DD995F89@BN8PR07MB7076.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAKD1Yr3Z9wGQ+uiA2WcW00MrOiLyHs+bSoFjHVtrixCi2qp4DA@mail.gmail.com> <BN8PR07MB7076A6456CAB48EF428D6E8695F89@BN8PR07MB7076.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> <65d0d9ac-77fc-c200-09e3-0c3949ca1541@gmail.com> <CAN-Dau2FS99ewfgH8xk-jSJFCnO92CJV9ZC98DUE2UDR7V1Eww@mail.gmail.com> <CANMZLAYbpZBDA8uFnJqfWfWTQ4S9RN4a-DqWe36qzfAfDtXiQA@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau0BjRR2_7xz38DpJsz0Y=Z_8bV5n-=Eh1QUVEDzqVxmaA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=H=eAyRu0JcHnLpZEUizDZ4Kj0VwPu=0nM=Wn+y3Ho1w@mail.gmail.com> <CAM5+tA_4rtSkgEuRUFZ2LYr6i8a7vWeKODYieVARF3RbRvgRww@mail.gmail.com> <BN8PR07MB7076DE3E745CB916FB81879595FA9@BN8PR07MB7076.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> <ADAE42CE-448F-42F5-89BE-692F493E2DC8@consulintel.es> <CAM5+tA_ksJ+agY1tze1-zPHLsgYFgjEYtnuPs+ffZbnRqiHytw@mail.gmail.com> <BAD082DA-0958-4926-B3E5-4E4599A75078@consulintel.es> <BN8PR07MB7076564E50C0DAFBFAB950FD95FA9@BN8PR07MB7076.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAPt1N1ncVkekecS=dBHSR3WtaEMruy55Udxy0WSMGTgbN24pKw@mail.gmail.com> <CAM5+tA8-Zqka-vZ9jRL3wn0dtfuJj0ECx_k9prwyS2ypisaPtw@mail.gmail.com> <FB031B76-7E88-4824-876F-D1A05F8D2215@thehobsons.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <FB031B76-7E88-4824-876F-D1A05F8D2215@thehobsons.co.uk>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 12:53:05 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFU7BAST-oNGpy4JvODDsf=8eS69hV8XCi8OgEHBkkoujRN3Rw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon <linux@thehobsons.co.uk>
Cc: 6man list <ipv6@ietf.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/isHZQhDrFkzOVWmJnDDojc0idEY>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider operational input]]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 10:53:19 -0000

On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:15 AM Simon <linux@thehobsons.co.uk> wrote:
> The IPv6 community needs to engage with this other regulatory community to get them to bring their standard into the 21st century.
>
> As long as the PCI standard effectively mandates IPv4 & NAPT then it’s going to be an uphill struggle.

See my email I sent yesterday. PCR DSS 4.0 (published in March 2022)
does not mandate NAT for IPv6. The text has been updated.

-- 
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email