Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Tue, 22 March 2022 10:09 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562E93A0DFE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 03:09:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HHz5B-20D7UL for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 03:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D4E73A0DF7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 03:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1647943781; x=1679479781; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=JYP/RTmIp0Fi9dcbZF8ONdF7Q654OTXZnzNlhDm0y4o=; b=e3+WXiIgt+g4HI/qNLaF++boeAP4gK/Rgo7FSf9nGbvYLROFRBHJzdA0 QCy0YH3OjoVnl+VK+vPor+OTapPAb0imBDhetN+iC/uO7jJVpJVp1zOVd 1dIU7PkPPrjskC7EHRQdHL1wHYiYGuEgRkoX3rOnaHhfhMGhHTOjRMzZs jmC7YPo1hkjwRrvEPI54/X2/hNzKIlzV2ql69Zrd5mREAAHxo3n8Xdem5 K6VDpZ8L2bz+Qci+OppPDO9r6Qm8FSRkgpB4yuBq8bOH6IYpOjbbhQbvk sNEsw3UGV1wPLafsrM425G+Xh7r6ojgDg/fMTs1aOjFTXE26T7oKyoKi0 A==;
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Mar 2022 11:09:36 +0100
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8634940CA3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:09:36 +0100 (CET)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7490B406DD; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:09:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 6CE7F115842; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:09:36 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:09:36 +0100
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <YjmgYA2Wee8f2HAY@Space.Net>
References: <52661a3d-75dc-111a-3f23-09b10d7cb8d4@gmail.com> <A72CDDDB-CDCE-4EAF-B95E-997C764DB2C4@gmail.com> <9175dc32-45c1-e948-c20a-3bcc958b77b9@gmail.com> <YjmJQMNgnJoSInUw@Space.Net> <D75EF08F-6A41-41B2-AFB2-649CBCC1D83E@consulintel.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <D75EF08F-6A41-41B2-AFB2-649CBCC1D83E@consulintel.es>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/QKyP1GRGyu8OvkVM0BcoQlKMoQc>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 10:09:47 -0000

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:10:35AM +0100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> The problem is the same regardless of the "size" of the organization.
> The difference is that "today" most SMEs don't have that problem
> because they don't have PI, but it may turn the same when they
> realize that not being PI have renumbering issues if changing the
> ISP. Of course, again, if we talk about a "small" SME, then may not
> be an issue, they only have 40 or 50 devices to renumber (your
> mileage will vary), not easy but not "terrible".

This class of SMEs is what I meant with "largely unmanaged" networks.

If you do not put your IPv6 addresses into excel sheets or other 
"management systems", but just let SLAAC + bonjour do its job, I'd 
claim that a "renumbering event" basically isn't such a big deal.

Much less than "find an ISP that knows what PI is and is willing to
route it for you, for the same price as a PA/DHCPv6PD provisioned
service".

Combine "we do not put static IPv6 addresses on things, but let SLAAC
happen" with "everything that might need remote access (= addresses
would need to be known) is in someone's Cloud already", things get
even easier.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279