IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Wed, 23 March 2022 05:54 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083FF3A0657 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 22:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DMAVTBCACpWw for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 22:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D71B3A0490 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 22:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1648014881; x=1679550881; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=mIajAcWjLYoN0ZB12E/UlVI3SaTdLzPO5yTS0QFwjzA=; b=bGxa5W4fWw/XJyawIp1sUcV71v+c6vIi6wYdDnfoKaOL7htQH8chc7iM 0S80KyCmvPgux/zQ9XSFNByFgkxAMZKJXkfLLIStn/9emEIsI6oi87Pvp lxa9MALjCgzU6wFC+VTxjM2LC5GfYjYV1E3wd2n/WagY5Z6hNRq46uJzM dnCY682tipq2wg/PHp0H4lvH9Trvt2y7FSI8fjnXQnceWKj/TMENtShrR kkpMCuCTriYvroEXSLVAUbiMI696UwwuLz2KpQwwvnulBdTzFrde55z5n T3lolnICMMtzNnHRJHwiJPc6Hk4C8nxUSnvhjaL0tdAtdDBGwZqyzAcGM Q==;
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Mar 2022 06:54:35 +0100
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690A84192C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 06:54:34 +0100 (CET)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EEE40CA3; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 06:54:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 56C33118368; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 06:54:34 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 06:54:34 +0100
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Nick Buraglio <buraglio@es.net>
Cc: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, v6ops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <Yjq2Gr2cQjFuQ8ie@Space.Net>
References: <52661a3d-75dc-111a-3f23-09b10d7cb8d4@gmail.com> <A72CDDDB-CDCE-4EAF-B95E-997C764DB2C4@gmail.com> <9175dc32-45c1-e948-c20a-3bcc958b77b9@gmail.com> <YjmJQMNgnJoSInUw@Space.Net> <fd17a91f-68dc-92b5-0544-51aefa1b7f08@gmail.com> <CAM5+tA-Wq5O4pjQ++VZQi-FTKZGMRAW-LFc6O5dPOyox4QZDEw@mail.gmail.com> <YjpA4IH/eI5im8DT@Space.Net> <CAM5+tA-foEATL9uihwD=zoTZ1EvHiwc5k_xKf=GRNYD51REQYQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="H/sytyJOc2z+k1yt"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAM5+tA-foEATL9uihwD=zoTZ1EvHiwc5k_xKf=GRNYD51REQYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/1p3HPMBso_u9o6sNjEzswZXoCdc>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 05:54:46 -0000

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 04:50:19PM -0500, Nick Buraglio wrote:
> Sure, I can edit the gai.conf table on a handful of systems, 

This is not what I had in mind.  If "we" decide that ULA is a good
way forward, IETF can update RFCs, and vendors will eventually
update their base OS.  It might take 5 years, but so will everything
else in Big Enterprise land.

And yes, your Cameras will never get an update - but I do not see them
in a dual-stacked network anyway, and they have no CLAT, so their
preference is not relevant.  It will have to use what is there.

(Dual-stack cannot be the answer anyway - it will have all the issues
of IPv4, plus the added complications of dual-stack.  Services need to
be dual-stack, but for all the rest, single-stack IPv6 needs to be
the end goal - see facebook etc)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email