IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 21 March 2022 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFDD3A1B63 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zZS03fQM7mMY for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62e.google.com (mail-pl1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 972D33A0E5F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id e5so2106048pls.4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=N6gwHtMflRgAmMPaoqztq2OEDmj3zVR+QdAFetoM/k8=; b=XlR6aixhu6cj4GhmXKlmi9gdZi6/7BM91tm7XQ8rjPiETchuDEH7u8JjA1Nca9tB3j Q1hFjRNiLxTJILM12xS+GIzdqiCBaxk6JNLWnrQYPULXht+K71PYzxIWO/Y+Zd8kD8iI zeebUcXFTs6+SR3fmKfFYs97GWHHUrfr7VnVjpz3NJ9RV6U2Sceao+lcL5SukIsQts55 tnh+WC81rSUWfFGaEalsxbLIWEstHG8PxGlq8qptiEWLGgiW+L/XcHJXwUtNQf5/e3xa zaW/WSaxXpSjeLwrKimjM3Za3QAiqSL5RoDfiWRmyiPm+sognsNYqLr0hMF0LI8OHrmh SttQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=N6gwHtMflRgAmMPaoqztq2OEDmj3zVR+QdAFetoM/k8=; b=DZG+dDMna7YdpQLJ8P8FFPTGuM1j1YWvKeBRwAXgnfUkEoHzlZf8c8vKCzU4790pTc EAXeEagR0ru4ve90QHCXI2SD820iuADDu9Uer5ifuwvJBXo1gL9COf5wHiSUBhXgEOla MiY4K0KS2l03Mu6+gAzC5SabGa/vh37IFKNaORw+a2bqdKyI6xdsKNxF3EuArTqSbbpx +tzCdHdHLag4jVeUx4I8KD5XyKJ/IMSY1Ibeos2mbg1kHR67sXUgFrbBOc0Awb38PfrC o7Jzt7HjaFUpMXfa0wyCZgwxKJy7FH5rFexSo1dWDWr8d67V14v4w+jnyzcsqhIItkTs U7fw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531cjmXLOMRKmk/t2ibagV7Zptu3hyJG0ll0idTOr1NWIPMULStC K8G/FDX1DmKOd+HoSgXGmoewBCub49JyVg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxj4Y3CupUuDE89cVhG8fctXt3XXPVWCiH7KzjL+ixy+0BlCObtqKd5qSdPeUkZejvmE7yn/A==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7141:b0:153:8050:4357 with SMTP id u1-20020a170902714100b0015380504357mr14644333plm.166.1647899414963; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2601:648:8200:dd20:89d4:2618:e99:f56f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id mq6-20020a17090b380600b001c6357f146csm403885pjb.12.2022.03.21.14.50.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Fred Baker <FredBaker.IETF@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <52661a3d-75dc-111a-3f23-09b10d7cb8d4@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:50:14 -0700
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Message-Id: <A72CDDDB-CDCE-4EAF-B95E-997C764DB2C4@gmail.com>
References: <52661a3d-75dc-111a-3f23-09b10d7cb8d4@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19E241)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/4jbUNyb8PfYZfy0xprVI6EOYEjQ>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 21:50:19 -0000


Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways...

> On Mar 21, 2022, at 2:05 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> "Why didn't those idiots make IPv6 backward-compatible with IPv4?"

To which the obvious answer is “IPv4 isn’t forward compatible with anything. It was designed to be replaced.”

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email