IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider operational input]]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 29 April 2022 22:13 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95B4C159A32; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 15:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.956
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.956 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.857, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G4mjgk_EDSmE; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 15:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1034.google.com (mail-pj1-x1034.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1034]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 282B2C159525; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 15:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1034.google.com with SMTP id t11-20020a17090ad50b00b001d95bf21996so11668478pju.2; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 15:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FbWfAIeMceIIDIWv9IVgKfs1fHTcMCgHXIgFRPmOzcU=; b=mQgN5XVx3dVOPD0Ou/msnoffKLcFYKZXSl8Y9BYDtKimcdC0gx25I1YgA1a1b8uC0Z dBFN6hrq6vyHAqvUVRRpVkWsx/hrBgiWP75APMrdP0r9Tbt80QRqfZaMf7maScDHQ80e W8ZKWRAJKiQgQsMWTG0r/Wh0f3Gjudy+h1v5U14HmtqZCVV+iOJXAsrMoctUmQiH9qcF mpK/OYWvBSkiz34q+Dc020J4vEjv6J4DDGGjEMLSwhoo7CH1mlWMDMkPgw72BhgmjxbA /tuqSIkLQjgdVKofSotOppFFpDrU2S1el32Eo8YCwMTEK3QfbRm1jbgjkOrbyHoDZiBy b5XQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FbWfAIeMceIIDIWv9IVgKfs1fHTcMCgHXIgFRPmOzcU=; b=SfRYMG+7y9jkcvhvLy2RQpm2nloGqC7lyGCsxtxFaUXDvQCr6HOx5tvfBjDlxiw+g1 Yqj+ofhJB7oVDsNJrtc00ZOpKmydiS6mcP4T9acqrxiHqAlvwlwNvQI+VO5UghtFIdlM tI3T1aDALoqUp9bvOOXDC2Zp3E5JnQiI99/+XpoXBlV+YrdnMQdpDFDx0orlOxZCR72e eR2tIy1NynwkpepJtvhNKopBfMOtMrcmShU7+d8N7BeHbjSWAVbh4pZfrJbSeWnazVdc d4tEPwxp/r1f3BgVIPyuKOQKvfOxgFJLltAmB1rSktlcqCuMzxyLzRDkfqg8ta45dUVP hhow==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530chkfyRP/rWr3ef2ZwYY6Id8aHic5D5UvhbXwbLt+OsdZfSRwt TyiGPWm5iFuVB6YvLniAlPIO6w992pljjg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyW4F0JI/WeQOXQKYAVZ8EM6fbJiMxgww03zgzKW6+bQrsnVGdPim4wcdo3AFLt/EW8UuuWRg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3805:b0:1db:c60d:59ed with SMTP id mq5-20020a17090b380500b001dbc60d59edmr1231129pjb.97.1651270417129; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 15:13:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:1005:b501:db7:d041:a2d:ce65? ([2406:e003:1005:b501:db7:d041:a2d:ce65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f19-20020a170902ab9300b0015e8d4eb2a5sm88284plr.239.2022.04.29.15.13.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 29 Apr 2022 15:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
To: David Farmer <farmer=40umn.edu@dmarc.ietf.org>, Kevin Myers <kevin.myers@iparchitechs.com>
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>, 6man list <ipv6@ietf.org>, Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <CAM5+tA8WvjvWirxqE6kQ9LQAG0NcpWyCLGVooB=G7gZ9ETb2zQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1ncVkekecS=dBHSR3WtaEMruy55Udxy0WSMGTgbN24pKw@mail.gmail.com> <CAM5+tA8-Zqka-vZ9jRL3wn0dtfuJj0ECx_k9prwyS2ypisaPtw@mail.gmail.com> <FB031B76-7E88-4824-876F-D1A05F8D2215@thehobsons.co.uk> <CAFU7BAST-oNGpy4JvODDsf=8eS69hV8XCi8OgEHBkkoujRN3Rw@mail.gmail.com> <699f556a3eac41179a80d2cc8749a191@huawei.com> <CAO42Z2wiebCOPmtcEOJ3rOaZEpHE7qFZZTf5KLWybSsL6rOd9Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau1FV-uEkX1S7vOEVxggjcNvUVTmokPAEOiapxPTySN-vw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1mk8Qv1anXohCJaiH0WWn-BkS4mr=ffyF0cCaE7CM314w@mail.gmail.com> <CAE=N4xf_wRPQeChkfXWxj7+Do8jp2U6hDtjH+-RUNis+ynMRbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAM5+tA__Gegt5fR1UFwshm7DKDVMDpFsJK2jMG6Z6Yo79Noc3A@mail.gmail.com> <59b90d7184194a84a0c53b616796dec0@huawei.com> <BN8PR07MB70767C3EC7B68EF1D2286CFE95FC9@BN8PR07MB7076.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAN-Dau3iyP7sMUsiP3ckYEpkLoQK-bpgKnDn6d4Ci7f9V_5CPw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <c2a9e28e-8acd-70eb-ada4-f9fe7394c881@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 10:13:30 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAN-Dau3iyP7sMUsiP3ckYEpkLoQK-bpgKnDn6d4Ci7f9V_5CPw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/5zZ9akfWCGVUN1EZFPDyCDT8B6M>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider operational input]]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 22:13:39 -0000

On 30-Apr-22 09:20, David Farmer wrote:
> I think this problem needs to be worked on, so I think this draft should be promoted to v6ops WG draft.

FWIW, I agree. That's why I updated the subject field to "Vicious circle" because I wanted to separate out the adoption problem in general from the ULA precedence issue.

Sometime I wonder if anyone actually reads the subject field in my emails ;-(.

     Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email