Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input

Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com> Tue, 22 March 2022 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7116E3A0B21 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L7Ujt6nllYCZ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 640083A094A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml735-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4KNHJM461xz67MnJ for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:39:31 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mscpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.188.26.142) by fraeml735-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.216) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 17:41:42 +0100
Received: from mscpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.188.26.142) by mscpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.188.26.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.21; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 19:41:41 +0300
Received: from mscpeml500001.china.huawei.com ([7.188.26.142]) by mscpeml500001.china.huawei.com ([7.188.26.142]) with mapi id 15.01.2308.021; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 19:41:41 +0300
From: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
CC: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input
Thread-Index: AQHYPWL+5ay9cZSrXUWG+DzsIaGQi6zKIZgAgAAMoQCAAA6FAIAApH4AgAALFICAAAQtAIAADRyAgABSdzCAAAILgIAASmeA
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 16:41:41 +0000
Message-ID: <acc2167b1f2f4d1194667baee66af47f@huawei.com>
References: <52661a3d-75dc-111a-3f23-09b10d7cb8d4@gmail.com> <A72CDDDB-CDCE-4EAF-B95E-997C764DB2C4@gmail.com> <9175dc32-45c1-e948-c20a-3bcc958b77b9@gmail.com> <YjmJQMNgnJoSInUw@Space.Net> <D75EF08F-6A41-41B2-AFB2-649CBCC1D83E@consulintel.es> <CAPt1N1nRnYUFA=yyJHx6t52yqWbmcd2Tf1H8gQuCZBd3Q3VqJw@mail.gmail.com> <YjmhC2mTibDam806@Space.Net> <eb55e2b19a3145edbfca377a61ca3aaa@huawei.com> <Yjnn7x3eLXr9/8oE@Space.Net>
In-Reply-To: <Yjnn7x3eLXr9/8oE@Space.Net>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.81.192.44]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/jFBQd69iQRYZ8evdcs5LTFLPVU8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 16:41:57 -0000

Agree.
Just the problem of HNCP adoption.
Ed/
-----Original Message-----
From: Gert Doering [mailto:gert@space.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 6:15 PM
To: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
Cc: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>; Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>; v6ops@ietf.org; JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 12:10:16PM +0000, Vasilenko Eduard wrote:
> Small businesses are asking for less complexity, not more. They would probably ignore more complex options.

HNCP is the least complexity a SME can have.

"Buy two routers, plug them together in an arbitrary fashion, get multihoming".

Not even having to care about "LAN" or "WAN" ports.

I tested this with the OpenWRT implementation - it's really nice stuff.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279