IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider operational input]]

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Fri, 29 April 2022 07:24 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52852C13A8E9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FHeyC-6zFjWn for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 009B9C13A8EE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1651217060; x=1682753060; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=rmpcpc8C5/ffpRv5+2CQQo7NmkQT5IhtCfdCJcqzy64=; b=AOhR5fzAGgwN29kW2S1YLAWPmmC2PdK3wToHoa/hDZQduMbRgbPjs/hQ ATsBeCFK0cP0av7tSaj0ebD9/q8RiLGYDVOxm/OrV/4WmfibsKi+1EHX9 X8v4RBxvOQffCrY8elMN2KQKHN15PccrtL3v7Zqr3SCLMmKV9C92tlz9X w62IHanIe0sZlIlINnksUBz9r3PWUIH3Vnu+ffwFB57YOe5E02LspoEbM vDFEJBQfAxxa0hOZITGT9Fm01zJjrzN43t2nV3exOGR23QQJ9BqYmkNKT pmiuXOjU1KbBQLA1PQtOUebvnfSj3hu/8gXC2zV4xikuSuf2Ms+msdMvE w==;
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Apr 2022 09:24:17 +0200
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5849041954 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 09:24:17 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457B6406DD; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 09:24:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 43F0811332A; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 09:24:17 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 09:24:17 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: Kevin Myers <kevin.myers@iparchitechs.com>, 6man list <ipv6@ietf.org>, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <YmuSoZ+HuNlnqcrK@Space.Net>
References: <CANMZLAYbpZBDA8uFnJqfWfWTQ4S9RN4a-DqWe36qzfAfDtXiQA@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau0BjRR2_7xz38DpJsz0Y=Z_8bV5n-=Eh1QUVEDzqVxmaA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=H=eAyRu0JcHnLpZEUizDZ4Kj0VwPu=0nM=Wn+y3Ho1w@mail.gmail.com> <CAM5+tA_4rtSkgEuRUFZ2LYr6i8a7vWeKODYieVARF3RbRvgRww@mail.gmail.com> <BN8PR07MB7076DE3E745CB916FB81879595FA9@BN8PR07MB7076.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> <ADAE42CE-448F-42F5-89BE-692F493E2DC8@consulintel.es> <CAM5+tA_ksJ+agY1tze1-zPHLsgYFgjEYtnuPs+ffZbnRqiHytw@mail.gmail.com> <BAD082DA-0958-4926-B3E5-4E4599A75078@consulintel.es> <BN8PR07MB7076564E50C0DAFBFAB950FD95FA9@BN8PR07MB7076.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAPt1N1ncVkekecS=dBHSR3WtaEMruy55Udxy0WSMGTgbN24pKw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1ncVkekecS=dBHSR3WtaEMruy55Udxy0WSMGTgbN24pKw@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/_2CHPq4XjUfY_EFzikNEIE9eI24>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider operational input]]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:24:40 -0000

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 08:49:04PM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote:
> I think the thing to object to here is that we would go hat in hand to
> convince them to switch to IPv6. If IPv4 is working for them, why would we
> do this?

I, for one, would love to stop building dual-stack products at some
time.  Like, as a software developer, why do I need to care about IPv4?

Because not everybody has arrived in IPv6 land yet.

Dual-stack is a major pain at all levels.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email