IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider operational input]]

Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-11@u-1.phicoh.com> Tue, 03 May 2022 06:53 UTC

Return-Path: <pch-b28DE43C2@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8F7C157B3E; Mon, 2 May 2022 23:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QAuxr1dBaGF1; Mon, 2 May 2022 23:53:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (stereo.hq.phicoh.net [IPv6:2a10:3781:2413:1:2a0:c9ff:fe9f:17a9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01E52C157B44; Mon, 2 May 2022 23:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (localhost [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by stereo.hq.phicoh.net with esmtp (TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305) (Smail #158) id m1nlmPp-0000JaC; Tue, 3 May 2022 08:53:45 +0200
Message-Id: <m1nlmPp-0000JaC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Cc: Kevin Myers <kevin.myers@iparchitechs.com>, 6man list <ipv6@ietf.org>
From: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-11@u-1.phicoh.com>
Sender: pch-b28DE43C2@u-1.phicoh.com
References: <CAM5+tA8WvjvWirxqE6kQ9LQAG0NcpWyCLGVooB=G7gZ9ETb2zQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=H=eAyRu0JcHnLpZEUizDZ4Kj0VwPu=0nM=Wn+y3Ho1w@mail.gmail.com> <CAM5+tA_4rtSkgEuRUFZ2LYr6i8a7vWeKODYieVARF3RbRvgRww@mail.gmail.com> <BN8PR07MB7076DE3E745CB916FB81879595FA9@BN8PR07MB7076.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> <ADAE42CE-448F-42F5-89BE-692F493E2DC8@consulintel.es> <CAM5+tA_ksJ+agY1tze1-zPHLsgYFgjEYtnuPs+ffZbnRqiHytw@mail.gmail.com> <BAD082DA-0958-4926-B3E5-4E4599A75078@consulintel.es> <BN8PR07MB7076564E50C0DAFBFAB950FD95FA9@BN8PR07MB7076.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAPt1N1ncVkekecS=dBHSR3WtaEMruy55Udxy0WSMGTgbN24pKw@mail.gmail.com> <CAM5+tA8-Zqka-vZ9jRL3wn0dtfuJj0ECx_k9prwyS2ypisaPtw@mail.gmail.com> <FB031B76-7E88-4824-876F-D1A05F8D2215@thehobsons.co.uk> <CAFU7BAST-oNGpy4JvODDsf=8eS69hV8XCi8OgEHBkkoujRN3Rw@mail.gmail.com> <699f556a3eac41179a80d2cc8749a191@huawei.com> <CAO42Z2wiebCOPmtcEOJ3rOaZEpHE7qFZZTf5KLWybSsL6rOd9Q@mail.gmail.com> <626B2E07.5070601@jmaimon.com> <m1nlQyw-0000F4C@stereo.hq.phic oh.net> <BN8PR07MB7076EE22F0BFDB2D192B065D95C19@BN8PR07MB7076.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 2 May 2022 22:21:35 +0000 ." <BN8PR07MB7076EE22F0BFDB2D192B065D95C19@BN8PR07MB7076.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 08:53:43 +0200
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Iyv-cEXX_C6f_SXM8ZciOWRNB10>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider operational input]]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 06:53:56 -0000

> I'm not aware of any
> tracking for IPv6 specifically as a market cap. If you're looking
> at market capitalization, most of the companies in the DFZ are
> classified in telecommunications for market cap. Total market cap
> for all global publicly traded companies is 86.136 Trillion. (source:
> companiesmarketcap.com)
> 
> 2022 Telecommunications: $2.557 Trillion
> 
> 2022 Retail: 4.374 Trillion 2022 Banking: 6.986 Trillion 2022
> Healthcare: 1.376 Trillion
> 
> This is a pretty simple conclusion, we cannot afford to ignore
> enterprises if we want to get large scale IPv6 adoption for just
> about any industry - otherwise money that could be going to IPv6
> innovation as systems are refreshed will simply get used elsewhere
> and delay adoption.

So the conclusing seems to be: we have no clue how much enterprise is 
spending on telecommunications, but because enterprise has a large 
market cap, it must be important.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email