IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 21 March 2022 21:05 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B351E3A1B29 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eSdA-5512REa for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x630.google.com (mail-pl1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0C6B3A1607 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x630.google.com with SMTP id i11so13112272plr.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nwJw2HMwlezJGSxjfPyckdQopn8GCcD8geBn+1DU5RY=; b=j0Y10KmQtwmUkj6l4Kw5E7bxfafUCk7qepPyaIyVsiF2Vh8fAZoJiiA4fiM0URkbAK C6mBw8lDFs0AXK+EU9ARkvKURNmKiJ9pQ8eT7xrauOzW6jCl4ebJmFUaelWD6MAki5Ue 1nPpqgvP9YhKjvsRK5h707JZ+i00OKSHbJ6ABjQy5WgWo4xfwe1egTsJl3Xqqf7X4lei yugS5MnoiyMCqAd+5q4No5tB+8iTgW9/q1u34Qg1jttfqgLxIKSGWKdvFHgv63kaO38Q WhBoCm2sMtdHiPo6VhC/zhQXNbI2DHs4C4hPUFFxBvyP0meLgASSWQVq/y4JLehAXWMj 90BA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nwJw2HMwlezJGSxjfPyckdQopn8GCcD8geBn+1DU5RY=; b=Bu4l4UJxxdXwq1LDoWjc+k6dL6FM4os2ArvDk5HRMkuzGSqbdkx1xH1XHGZUk9giqm 1AP/VpbRxHBTlz9ZqVgYzlL0NolCI13iCGo+jIROttL0E1sQU0XmZ3RsfTvrPHBqEseo NLZkKT5Uimn/D9ZPB+gIMOfez7qcXnMBb5F08dmtyv/kCDY4zg5Bu+U2KpAvZYLiqJwz t1bzXry5sieOAqnb/zI7xTwc9KpwMWQsKTdcWIEqUJHEM1zOGDcyZZ7MmkN5U3PSIkGx Eg9RB/88Vo5jfwQQk/Wjt8K/L8JDScAwZco8bl2fjTs+PCHggcmImK6wJ3nw0F6BPTm+ 6SMQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532oSnRdYwjFJ6YVDUTtRTwzGWZyFak0D4CrJV76+TRUiic9qUwx Qp+95aUS8IxZiLyfxT28nUSFKe01AzJJow==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwNU8FazEEs4ubcwCIZdHMfEvu9sv7jFf5NNUh3gF0UmnV9ZSgo6Y8KGXTgr2rIxDec6Vq7aA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e84f:b0:153:fedf:519 with SMTP id t15-20020a170902e84f00b00153fedf0519mr14846990plg.153.1647896707613; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:1005:b501:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:1005:b501:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b16-20020a056a00115000b004f6ff260c9esm20113183pfm.207.2022.03.21.14.05.05 for <v6ops@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <BE3310F7-692C-46E9-A75B-07C4C3C6476F@gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <52661a3d-75dc-111a-3f23-09b10d7cb8d4@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 10:05:02 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BE3310F7-692C-46E9-A75B-07C4C3C6476F@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/2tKWjF62Quimxgco24aqtu_d46w>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 21:05:15 -0000

Fred,

On 22-Mar-22 09:33, Fred Baker wrote:
> I have thought some about the discussion we had in the V6ops meeting about increasing operational input. Several suggestions were made: add a separate meeting, segregate parts of the meeting, attend the IEPG, use an interim, and so on. One thought that I had was to schedule a meeting at RIPE in May.
> 
> None of these address what seems to me to be a core problem: ISPs are deploying, but enterprise isn’t. How do we get enterprise on board?

That will only happen when it hurts *not* to deploy IPv6 inside the enterprise.

I suggest reading the discussions that regularly crop up on "The Register" forums whenever they post an IPv6 story: always on the lines of "Why didn't those idiots make IPv6 backward-compatible with IPv4?"

Look at the comments on https://www.theregister.com/2022/01/24/opinion_column_ipv6/ for a sample.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email