IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 21 March 2022 20:33 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF0BB3A1AF9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 13:33:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EgtmgRQsXtN9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 13:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x631.google.com (mail-pl1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::631]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61BFB3A0DF4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 13:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x631.google.com with SMTP id d18so13738085plr.6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 13:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:date:subject:message-id :to; bh=kEKIIDTd9uztqFZe3gPKWnKI+Z058Y7zLXnFy6Zk884=; b=JQhTk7NXF+c+ksH/p2GD+0W2RbszNwdoPFovQHI666OOJ1aQEyey0pYl/gY9dS2LcR ddgq9N5T/GG/MZox8V7ULRfAM8oktQlEaI/r8GAUL9vv+xw8PyJ99Lule+2l75OFsOBF uuh9NLKGVU0KUoi0j6iPF5nntrAnAikQ0e8HYSUv6+HA07Aa5/Hec5qyCFRoBsp8to3g mkTXL4fr4yuV8EC528QYHoIwTfqoQPJ8wx0H8P9+lkCRq6znXyda3RZH3Vda90b8ebn0 SUpRI3VhTT2D1+g8vEde+4zh4iN3Ny0hUIak7+c8EaxIH9gugsY/0IppKE+9zUtpI4WQ hDwA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:date :subject:message-id:to; bh=kEKIIDTd9uztqFZe3gPKWnKI+Z058Y7zLXnFy6Zk884=; b=iDiMzLwHNsBq9l5r01EeYZQLX5SOyLrvmmURRSehoAe/Cnq5KL+14h2fwnG7E54voS GwjjEfqY7V4NY8qwCY2SgKpx48KPLZdN1o5fursXZGhHWdqUwC6AGy2tGm76w7tXoRyb vfj9QEOfZf2QyzzsdLKJv/sWlhm0SZL0/t8G7FekSpyrxZSQiqLZZNnbUv8DzQ4Ea1eV 2j+kDAyvGojAzGcf0Cxiyq9ZVO7RanseNBb2z+IdyWcgQqkiZxE8T7/kDkjhXE5pYqlS pZWT98LTUtxGZjU0LXcEnWFA/TLf4J6NAh8vsCnw1VtIcSUtaJjUg1ou+rz5R73/rCnb +o8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530BcDpvBay5Rx6wcXZVQGWqVlVYiUXh6ormU9H2z/yeRjzzYNG2 P+P4vsMxH/3Q3W6ZCJuD/UsV3vZuemp+sA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw7ZXUnjT4/DT1kDheeDlsj+4SlwvwjolSkR+mdcTuTK2ECFcdOWHIwm7zt7mrF8uy2gIsekA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:33cb:b0:1bf:844b:44b4 with SMTP id lk11-20020a17090b33cb00b001bf844b44b4mr926283pjb.153.1647894792138; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 13:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2601:648:8200:dd20:6562:fbfa:f0db:aed6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r15-20020a63ce4f000000b00341c40f913esm15308064pgi.87.2022.03.21.13.33.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Mar 2022 13:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 13:33:10 -0700
Message-Id: <BE3310F7-692C-46E9-A75B-07C4C3C6476F@gmail.com>
To: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19E241)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/7-SuigPyP0R-C6ZChm4-EOERBIQ>
Subject: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 20:33:15 -0000

I have thought some about the discussion we had in the V6ops meeting about increasing operational input. Several suggestions were made: add a separate meeting, segregate parts of the meeting, attend the IEPG, use an interim, and so on. One thought that I had was to schedule a meeting at RIPE in May.

None of these address what seems to me to be a core problem: ISPs are deploying, but enterprise isn’t. How do we get enterprise on board?

Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email