Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input
"E. Marie Brierley" <ebrierley@saatvikadvisors.com> Wed, 30 March 2022 04:11 UTC
Return-Path: <ebrierley@saatvikadvisors.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F293A0063 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 21:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=netorgft4054402.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hvNognDRAkNq for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 21:10:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn8nam11on20604.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:7eae::604]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CAA33A005C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 21:10:59 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=XzT/aqk98JA1hNrh5xGLyzvkbHY3etly2HsvHfkTW/WkXXrVyDF41vPy6nG2FnkR177SarwNTQKH0271hjl08bmUl52lfDtIvZ6C8vlFRtzE2WbVdJjGPdyuwOBxWClJtoWMZrRWOV0jT0Fjx+HE6ejomKEIzubK7tbYb7ZV5MrbbJ0UaM8xdHyy0wHVG73kxGV5hYg2dX+VzhkqWJyM9j9Bu2UUund154GSkhUGoWZeGPBLx1Iiii+DBFLGc0DP24zPIkxKbvT8d0LAvz0h2RX+kUIZX5yPpG23ZF3MOU1nEYKZ13nKX6xhHzYf0DSMhEix646sPiZvQWvQ+xJANA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=Kn2Ja690PhV60QxWk65fcogpAVvqVskfBsRw20as3T4=; b=IY5eQMNT6X5YP371eyG9vS5e9pmDGTUtg7XrD0M2VSQQQ6fhai1MTz/8papVB0PEiREXTwRDKCPqMkIFaAbnv3zv2uM5MazWE16y5qsJiOkLiQeD0RWGSGzGwD1pMDbByRPSFRmqEC7epzvIj5uodhqV4qZSImXhFToXCZPEpjDbKZDVOa0yXwCqUrVgh0l7WZ0PU964qOzyj8sQ/lRyGDhUjvxE4qDTTnPOsQAXWjDwF0Dnm/JKi9kBDffrkJgSQF0a7tAy0dy9LSN1/xpjtjMVfUbwWfmIrWCIYPmiTCx+KbfY5qVQEF/FTVcuofuNsHK+oj/CusnYAtd+8LTArw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=saatvikadvisors.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=saatvikadvisors.com; dkim=pass header.d=saatvikadvisors.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=NETORGFT4054402.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-NETORGFT4054402-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Kn2Ja690PhV60QxWk65fcogpAVvqVskfBsRw20as3T4=; b=pizDcMM0pjU8mxTfHe7hObVXhKZGzqxcQV30h/HyYtqDNZljLvCpjTwS99swubN5gx7AGRR4liOidG9B0mKvnPkf4aXRDmAPuA0Worp1m/RVVVAkoEy8axpLMp1prqaI/EQgcURLq2iA5Hrg3+AOj9f3dOzz9L9eZ4Xi2nOFpIM=
Received: from CO6PR19MB5467.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:14e::5) by PH7PR19MB5615.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:138::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5102.23; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 04:10:54 +0000
Received: from CO6PR19MB5467.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cdb0:6c24:e235:5550]) by CO6PR19MB5467.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cdb0:6c24:e235:5550%7]) with mapi id 15.20.5123.018; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 04:10:54 +0000
From: "E. Marie Brierley" <ebrierley@saatvikadvisors.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input
Thread-Index: AQHYPWL0IhX/LX077Ue9ln6yHMZ87KzKU+MAgAAMoQCAAA6FAIAApH0AgAALFICAAAQuAIAAAngAgAAp1QCAAC+pgIAL0TCAgAAMQwCAAACpyQ==
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 04:10:54 +0000
Message-ID: <CO6PR19MB54670882EC43B8FEB8BF5666BA1F9@CO6PR19MB5467.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
References: <52661a3d-75dc-111a-3f23-09b10d7cb8d4@gmail.com> <A72CDDDB-CDCE-4EAF-B95E-997C764DB2C4@gmail.com> <9175dc32-45c1-e948-c20a-3bcc958b77b9@gmail.com> <YjmJQMNgnJoSInUw@Space.Net> <D75EF08F-6A41-41B2-AFB2-649CBCC1D83E@consulintel.es> <CAPt1N1nRnYUFA=yyJHx6t52yqWbmcd2Tf1H8gQuCZBd3Q3VqJw@mail.gmail.com> <7F4AEB43-4B24-4A21-AE9D-3EB512B98C46@consulintel.es> <8fac4314b8244ba6b33eea68694296d0@huawei.com> <9A13E47B-75D0-443F-9EE9-D2917ACB2D0F@consulintel.es> <CAO42Z2xUG+BXj+VQpajed9aGjH+q-HR7RX7C-T4DsTbouz7xWQ@mail.gmail.com> <db66fe14-4391-b3ca-2219-e435d7e9cb28@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <db66fe14-4391-b3ca-2219-e435d7e9cb28@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
suggested_attachment_session_id: 0b5e776b-01da-33fc-49ef-d9ecca5b889c
authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=saatvikadvisors.com;
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 65e94911-9931-4f3f-1ce1-08da120348d8
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: PH7PR19MB5615:EE_
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <PH7PR19MB5615D83E425DCD7361849FFFBA1F9@PH7PR19MB5615.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-relay: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:CO6PR19MB5467.namprd19.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230001)(346002)(396003)(39830400003)(136003)(366004)(376002)(4326008)(8676002)(66476007)(66946007)(52536014)(66556008)(64756008)(966005)(33656002)(38100700002)(110136005)(38070700005)(76116006)(66574015)(30864003)(5660300002)(66446008)(508600001)(86362001)(55016003)(53546011)(316002)(8936002)(7696005)(6506007)(2906002)(83380400001)(18265965005)(186003)(71200400001)(166002)(122000001)(19627405001)(9686003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 2
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-1: 7CimUpLoHRqoR0fpwBPzwj1tcLmaccG1uq0=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CO6PR19MB54670882EC43B8FEB8BF5666BA1F9CO6PR19MB5467namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: saatvikadvisors.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CO6PR19MB5467.namprd19.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 65e94911-9931-4f3f-1ce1-08da120348d8
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Mar 2022 04:10:54.2358 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 76c9a629-347f-4c62-9c75-594fcdf3af07
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: u4Kfexsh6pYyv5Dw2CkagJLlBjMN1HhVJXxvSiMorUrQ7txAJcgkfUta7swbShg6EzhDLaXX0YOxKCHGDHbKNwWV6mRddkudbStKLK6M/KM=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PH7PR19MB5615
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/7pP-oq2tzEPbbwpoa9lMkumMy1w>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 04:11:08 -0000
Great point. If you can quantify that issue by some means, I can add it to my comms to digital marketers (along with geolocation deterioration). Cart conversion is extremely low <3%, so any factor that can be incrementally quantified and improved is welcome in that audience. E. Marie ________________________________ From: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 9:06 PM To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>; JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org> Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input > - What business problem does or can IPv6 solve better than existing IPv4? That suggests to me that an even earlier question is: - What business problems does IPv4 cause today? For example, I'm convinced that multiple layers of NAT44 (today's reality) cause problems, whose symptoms are often (from the end user's view) failed sessions that have to be repeated. These are *never* reported to any help desk and so don't appear in anybody's statistics - but they do detract from user experience and so presumably have an impact: lost or delayed business. Others have mentioned the OPEX cost of diagnosing NAT-induced problems even with the enterprise. What else? Regards Brian Carpenter On 30-Mar-22 16:22, Mark Smith wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Mar 2022, 01:55 JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: > > Hi Eduard,____ > > __ __ > > What I meant is that I will like to avoid the issues that NAT creates for apps. We must aim for something better. > > This. > > IPv6+NAT creates a lot of the issues that IPv4+NAT does, so why bother deploying IPv6 when you've already got the equivalent via IPv4 today? > > > People need to understand why enterprises go to the expense of deploying technologies. > > Technology is a means to an end, not the end itself. Technology in business either saves money or makes money for the business. > > Enterprises in the 1990s didn't really deploy IPv4, they deployed global email and WWW access. Deploying IPv4 was the means to reaching those ends, because IPv4 underpinned them. > > > So the questions to think about in the context of businesses and enterprises and IPv6 are: > > - What business problem does or can IPv6 solve better than existing IPv4? > > - IPv6 is the technology means to an end, so what is or are the ends that are of value to a business, where IPv6 is the better underpinning technology than IPv4 to reach those ends? > > - How can deploying IPv6 save or make money for a business? > > Regards, > Mark. > > > > ____ > > __ __ > > On the other side, using an experimental protocol for production networks, in my opinion is a big “NO”.____ > > __ __ > > Regards,____ > > Jordi____ > > @jordipalet____ > > __ __ > > __ __ > > __ __ > > El 22/3/22, 13:04, "v6ops en nombre de Vasilenko Eduard" <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de vasilenko.eduard=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> escribió:____ > > __ __ > > Hi Jordi,____ > > __ __ > > I understand the desire to fix broken things. (I doubt it is possible)____ > > But why NPT+ULA is not enough for MHMP now?____ > > It is very similar to what Enterprises and small businesses have now.____ > > They would be happy.____ > > __ __ > > Eduard____ > > *From:*v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org>] *On Behalf Of *JORDI PALET MARTINEZ > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 22, 2022 12:34 PM > *To:* v6ops@ietf.org <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org> > *Subject:* Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input____ > > __ __ > > You’re right. Let’s say it in a different way, as may be my first email was not clear on this.____ > > __ __ > > __1.__I don’t think we want again to repeat the NAT problems, so NPT is not a valid solution for me.____ > > __2.__I think in the future almost every site could want to be multihomed, in some cases “n” links active, many other cases just as a backup.____ > > __3.__This means that renumbering is not (probably) a valid choice in any cases.____ > > __4.__Can we make PI work in such “huge scale” scenario?____ > > __5.__Can source-address forwarding work and solve all that, or we need that and/or something else.____ > > __ __ > > Only if we solve this, organizations could learn that NAT with IPv6 is not the solution, but something better that provides the same results, and no need to have “private” addresses, because the way NAT is offering a “different” addressing inside and outside is not NAT per-se, but statefull firewalling.____ > > __ __ > > Regards,____ > > Jordi____ > > @jordipalet____ > > __ __ > > __ __ > > __ __ > > El 22/3/22, 10:27, "v6ops en nombre de Ted Lemon" <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de mellon@fugue.com <mailto:mellon@fugue.com>> escribió:____ > > __ __ > > Is it really hncp that we needed here? I think the key tech we need is source-address-based forwarding, and babel i think has delivered that. Granted, getting that into soho routers is a problem. ____ > > __ __ > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:11 JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:____ > > Maybe the terminology is not the most appropriate and we should talk about "organizations", because there are many types of networks that have the same problem and those are not enterprises (such as government sites, NGOs, etc.). > > The problem is the same regardless of the "size" of the organization. The difference is that "today" most SMEs don't have that problem because they don't have PI, but it may turn the same when they realize that not being PI have renumbering issues if changing the ISP. Of course, again, if we talk about a "small" SME, then may not be an issue, they only have 40 or 50 devices to renumber (your mileage will vary), not easy but not "terrible". > > On the rest of Gert comments, definitively I agree, and specially on our big mistake not working further on HNCP. > > Regards, > Jordi > @jordipalet > > > > El 22/3/22, 9:31, "v6ops en nombre de Gert Doering" <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de gert@space.net <mailto:gert@space.net>> escribió: > > Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 11:42:12AM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > I agree with Jordi that multihoming is a genuine impediment. What isn't generally realised is that it's a problem of scale when considering at least 10,000,000 enterprises, much more than it's a problem of IPv6 itself. > > What is "an enterprise"? > > My stance on this is that for "largely unmanaged SoHo networks" - which > could be called "small enterprise" - dual-enduser-ISP with dual-/48 or > NPT66 gets the job done in an easy and scalable way (HNCP would have > been great, but IETF politics killed it). > > "Enterprise that truly need their own independent fully managed network > with multiple ISP uplinks and fully routed independent address space" > are probably way less than 10 million... > > Half of them do not want Internet access anyway, just access to their > ALGs that will do the filtering and TLS inspection and everything, and > then out to the Internet as a new TCP session (= could be done with > DMZ islands of upstream-provider-allocated space just fine). > > > We need to work on our marketing regarding multihoming. "What is it that > you get, what is the cost, which of the variants do you want, and why...?" > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 > > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6ops@ietf.org <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops> > > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com <http://www.theipv6company.com> > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. > > > > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6ops@ietf.org <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>____ > > _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list v6ops@ietf.org <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops> ____ > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com <http://www.theipv6company.com> > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.____ > > _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list v6ops@ietf.org <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops> ____ > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com <http://www.theipv6company.com> > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. > > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6ops@ietf.org <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops> > > > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6ops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops > _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
- [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Bob Hinden
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Bjoern A. Zeeb
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Toerless Eckert
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Xipengxiao
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Toerless Eckert
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Toerless Eckert
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Simon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gyan Mishra
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gyan Mishra
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input hsyu
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Scott Morizot
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Daniel Woititz
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Paolo Volpato
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Philipp S. Tiesel
- [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider oper… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Paolo Volpato
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Bob Hinden
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Paolo Volpato
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nalini J Elkins
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Xipengxiao
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input E. Marie Brierley
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input E. Marie Brierley
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input E. Marie Brierley
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Philipp S. Tiesel
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Simon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Simon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input otroan
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Simon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Simon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Simon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Xipengxiao
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input David Conrad
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input David Conrad
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Simon
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Greg Skinner
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Chris Cummings
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input daveb
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Thoughts about wider operational input Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Erik Auerswald
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Kevin Myers
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Kevin Myers
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Erik Auerswald
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Erik Auerswald
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Brian Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Erik Auerswald
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Erik Auerswald
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Erik Auerswald
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … otroan
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Erik Auerswald
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Erik Auerswald
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … otroan
- [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoughts … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… David Farmer
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Brian Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… David Farmer
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… George Michaelson
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Kevin Myers
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Kevin Myers
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Kevin Myers
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Erik Auerswald
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Simon
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Simon
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Kevin Myers
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Kevin Myers
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Xipengxiao
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Havard Eidnes
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… David Farmer
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Ed Horley
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Michael Sweet
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Kevin Myers
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Joe Maimon
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… David Farmer
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… David Farmer
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… David Farmer
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Ed Horley
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Kevin Myers
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Kevin Myers
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Ed Horley
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… David Farmer
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Erik Auerswald
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Ed Horley
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] ULA precedence [Thoughts about wider … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Georgi Stoev
- Re: [v6ops] Vicious circle [ULA precedence [Thoug… Brian E Carpenter