Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 24 May 2016 20:31 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1466F12D1EA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5c7rq8Y3RpWu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22d.google.com (mail-lb0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4818C12D504 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id ww9so9207944lbc.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Rz3XuAaiFs9k4LiIVjbDzkhr+sk1W1rSMv8t6J0N9Po=; b=d+8Q1tgyzDfYQ8FZAyTTFsaKo1U3RlTEDu68Cs7/l0mfFCS4LLsxPe4mt5etkPApln RG6iVXho2ghkd9Uuc1FxIJDoApjvrDWzFLjVeVh6pbF1v60rrRSY/loP31iX2StrKMzb vitg+I5rM0HPINYC+G1FRYC3rm3D1PnPQodZ1phDsy/fLHxUR30YkawFKQm9iVk7M6O/ /leyP9ygRWaH1LwvqgBvReLsFyNfu9K96a772XC5Jtb9Jg/tK0H9I9df77sB8jc98D6i YsEVxF7CtOvnjabL5/1MIdeiaxRhrLBqca4j7ooxA51QHs+BebRyQbi4q408m7xwmh5A Qs0w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Rz3XuAaiFs9k4LiIVjbDzkhr+sk1W1rSMv8t6J0N9Po=; b=cGmng2murbCNNSAqPcAEXoEityGQqWchdbccXQDydjaT5it/p1EjaweRXVtX5+FFRy WUFFeEbZLdDqcmuT0xhp31P4JUdODF86/H864sqeMMG/Gb821Wp5wdHKIvoP2m91766V gxfji06iEUVgs/jApYZeMC+PcPQtY6td4WQFqSQQG44rAHaUKrXPLOLm8QcAIlh7XYOf 1OT4iEUza2W32P5/MQ5X1PRtIdOPt7q1Vb/Lo5APYCk6SbhcnQjEO5DCrK9Pymg6GogY 1DsmAOd4pJh7mc7v3xsB5nzhdwZZupw/0JJeMKuUPOkWWXaGFaCqhsPLlroMDv4Oj7rI rRwg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKPzgVnTODBFg7xEBrSM9W/P2LcIv+gJJWKM6VVbscm4dvu5zP18zT49bhs4p86agn6KpqlrD5dWlDZDg==
X-Received: by 10.112.159.40 with SMTP id wz8mr20955lbb.87.1464121905406; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:31:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.153.135 with HTTP; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <bb91eea8-aaa4-164a-df29-ccb86d90ebcc@gmail.com>
References: <D3662363.190A96%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <8D82EA4F-1275-436C-8030-1E799F5D7F59@consulintel.es> <CABcZeBOCtk6JK_3w2_L87oyze+dfgy7fFyU7QrGmGgEtta1oZA@mail.gmail.com> <1CA535AB-CAC4-49CB-B094-AAA7FE3119FB@consulintel.es> <2b01eb8f-d319-7d20-0f84-9a774f9e0e44@nostrum.com> <C01AE269-3168-4B6A-B8D8-D97230288302@gmail.com> <8161273d-97c2-2757-5f0c-6146d0b297aa@nostrum.com> <E51DA1A2-AB3E-42F7-BC0A-308BE6B58580@gmail.com> <2270ea7c-cd6d-c3d5-e768-6d1f0ae15605@nostrum.com> <216D2B11-5E07-4DBE-BCC4-0A8ABCCB15B7@gmail.com> <cf9ad015-ef7d-6e11-44e8-6a0fb5a78b91@gmail.com> <EBBFC64A-C730-47D8-8F66-E4C7773A0344@gmail.com> <D5E06CF1-9C2D-41BE-8635-1F73321986EC@consulintel.es> <CAG4d1rfvYrW5TDCzdUoFeeQFnsDejWFn7jH+20xnJ4QHEsJ=2g@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1kG2_P5yBEOrajkNXZms438xRZuQTTcPnWnGDoqkYZCUQ@mail.gmail.com> <66d2fad7-ccc6-b63f-fb56-27b1c4f87174@gmail.com> <CAPt1N1kp=1neExB+kXjqivmuC1d4Y13Ve8VtjnMnu=-G8F2o8g@mail.gmail.com> <bb91eea8-aaa4-164a-df29-ccb86d90ebcc@gmail.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 16:31:05 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1mCcBU+9nwHXYJvj-L1=tYsOtdH5Tc_fdB6qhTB8RqRjA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2aea0147be105339c7268"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-y2SgEEGmdiXlf1miVeSP-lRPxI>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 20:31:50 -0000
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, there's some number of us who will not be going > to Singapore as a matter of personal conscience, aside > from those whose families may be at increased risk. > But either way, these seems like an odd way to deal with > problems around diversity and inclusion, and I hope that > people are asking themselves if they'd frame problems > around religious bias, race, and so on in quite the same way. > I don't think it's that clear-cut. I have no idea what my conscientious objection to going would be, although I do accept that you believe that there is such an objection that you feel the need to act on. >From my perspective we've heard from several people who would in principle be affected by this who are willing to go to Singapore, and we have heard from at least one person _living in Singapore_ who is in principle affected by this. Are his needs less important than the needs of other IETF attendees? How do we make that determination? We spent many years holding IETFs in a country, and in states in that country, that did not recognize LGBT rights, and nobody at that time ever proposed not holding IETFs in that country (the U.S.). We held many, many IETFs in that country. What has changed from then to now? In my personal opinion, what has changed is that there are now many fewer potential venues where LGBT families would have to worry. This is a wonderful, positive change. The number of potential IETF venues where such worries are an issue has substantially dropped. I get that because of that Singapore now feels like a backslide, but I think we should all (not just you, Melinda) ask ourselves how we would have felt if for the entire time from IETF 1 to IETF ~93 the U.S. were not in consideration as a potential country in which to hold IETFs. This was also true of Europe. It is only in the past three years that the IAOC has even really had a meaningful choice about whether to go to a country that recognized LGBT marital rights. I suspect that Singapore came into consideration prior to that happy event. So while I get that there are matters of principle at stake here, it's easy to imagine that IETF participants in Asia are a bit surprised by this. As an example, while I think Japan is pretty positive toward LGBT rights, there is no parity under law there for LGBT relationships as compared to cis-het relationships. I guess this could all come down to a rationalization. My opinion is that canceling IETF 100 in Singapore would be equivalent to having cancelled IETF 72 for the same reason if LGBT marital rights had been established in law in 2007 instead of in 2015. So it might be worth considering whether we would have done that.
- IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and … IAOC Chair
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Adam Roach
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Paul Wouters
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Michal Krsek
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… John C Klensin
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… nalini.elkins
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Peterson, Jon
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Michal Krsek
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… John C Klensin
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Brian E Carpenter
- IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and … Richard Barnes
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Lixia Zhang
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… John Levine
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… kathleen.moriarty.ietf
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Andrew Allen
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… nalini.elkins
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Paul Wouters
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… John C Klensin
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… l.wood
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… lloyd.wood
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Allison Mankin
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Harish Pillay
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Bob Hinden
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Dave Crocker
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Harish Pillay
- RE: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… John E Drake
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Paul Wouters
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Randy Bush
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Margaret Cullen
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Sam Hartman
- RE: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Christian Huitema
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … S Moonesamy
- build personal contacts outside of meetings [was … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Randall Gellens
- Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [… nalini.elkins
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… lloyd.wood
- Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [… Alia Atlas
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… lloyd.wood
- Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [… kathleen.moriarty.ietf
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [… kathleen.moriarty.ietf
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Sandoche Balakrichenan
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [… nalini.elkins
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Adam Roach
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… kathleen.moriarty.ietf
- Re: Havana and Juggalos (was: IETF 100, Singapore… Theodore V Faber
- Re: Havana and Juggalos (was: IETF 100, Singapore… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Jari Arkko
- Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [… HANSEN, TONY L
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Adam Roach
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Adam Roach
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Yoav Nir
- IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and … Barry Raveendran Greene
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Eliot Lear
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Adam Roach
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Alia Atlas
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Alia Atlas
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … S Moonesamy
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Melinda Shore
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Barry Raveendran Greene
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Alia Atlas
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Alia Atlas
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Melinda Shore
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … John Levine
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Alia Atlas
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Barry Raveendran Greene
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Margaret Cullen
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Ted Lemon
- RE: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Andrew Allen
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Melinda Shore
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Ole Jacobsen
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Sandoche Balakrichenan
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Vinayak Hegde
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … S Moonesamy
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Dave Crocker
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Patrick McManus
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … nalini.elkins
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … nalini.elkins
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Ole Jacobsen
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … nalini.elkins
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Margaret Cullen
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … S Moonesamy
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Melinda Shore
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … nalini.elkins
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Adam Roach
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … nalini.elkins
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Melinda Shore
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … S Moonesamy
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Melinda Shore
- Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Michal Krsek
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Ted Lemon
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Eliot Lear
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Cullen Jennings
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Paul Wouters
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Vinayak Hegde
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Vinayak Hegde
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Cullen Jennings
- RE: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Ted Lemon
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Margaret Cullen
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… kathleen.moriarty.ietf
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Donald Eastlake
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Eliot Lear
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Cullen Jennings
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Eliot Lear
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Sandoche Balakrichenan
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Vinayak Hegde
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… John Hoe
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward … Michael StJohns
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- prop… Livingood, Jason
- IAOC response to question of clarification Re: [R… Leslie Daigle
- Re: IAOC response to question of clarification Re… Ted Hardie