Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Wed, 25 May 2016 02:14 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D6112D151 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 19:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U6dEt3xrplQP for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 19:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x234.google.com (mail-pf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EA1412B03D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 19:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id c189so12888023pfb.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 19:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2kNVSeqmq1HrLJDAYqI5HLdsKTd4x6t3v7XTRZtKjw0=; b=t7q+rVeve+zXQOKiAD+3dNsyVoedGzu2b/SVgiZ0zLNby7QJkxc9ZE1w74OO3j9zp0 863pu//a1QomKeVuzRkDq1/c8yTxvdOHBsgxog7LVv8LBSmmgU+Kv0IqB7A30/91OMX1 VKRv24GGwwUVtRLlteLT0Gnv+6ZRDdZTmaPWUVYnWXsCJKZkFgT0TUu+nI1UKCjipZSF jnA4z737jI97WTXg2/N+6LI9cTJtPgrQyOzRXVH0xCba1/gYD2KNq+9kP4/2KX33k1xw g6mmzvabJZLKpI3x3Hv2nKyv0afSKzNHaT5kHEkiTAhECpLLNI0a1I8V49qF7cm+Gr9L V03g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2kNVSeqmq1HrLJDAYqI5HLdsKTd4x6t3v7XTRZtKjw0=; b=k25cljTffCNdDXBXafxJlrpURYho0oEwkLPu7Rcm8KC8J2ljDQgRRbhxdEI8M+Pjj8 JOxtC4ukpqZRLdih3ClcZiufZ0sL4qY4kn9duMDKKQg9kY6BenXDtjXnJxioJw0xX3Bm uknX7D5EtNLoUQLSxGHyMmafvrUNaYTN0zi+eaHg2ks3L14mzxzv/voEqFL4gal31+9i HL6uocvaiRVaEJMqJwBWU3isH/9DwIWDdiZjHIiobB26eMOFXhUJQuYmv8gI1huQNvzI ICbxaVxj/WJYRM+7g3p1sKswI3+EPdGR/wZHQ4f9qTWnmgVVPA6YXXuwo13HlJEh5IP+ 4X4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tL5wHsksaD8LsLcifSkbJaXsJvxH9DAsYBhIkWyROIb2l8Dzw4IS1+/OjJSxdhHIw==
X-Received: by 10.98.71.81 with SMTP id u78mr1994545pfa.29.1464142491084; Tue, 24 May 2016 19:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local (69-161-4-89-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [69.161.4.89]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f67sm57271144pff.62.2016.05.24.19.14.49 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 24 May 2016 19:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <D3662363.190A96%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <CABcZeBMPAFdLwZTr7TCJC-tZ+X=CKGzQ7Jp0zqDO86PdPn6YvQ@mail.gmail.com> <8D82EA4F-1275-436C-8030-1E799F5D7F59@consulintel.es> <CABcZeBOCtk6JK_3w2_L87oyze+dfgy7fFyU7QrGmGgEtta1oZA@mail.gmail.com> <1CA535AB-CAC4-49CB-B094-AAA7FE3119FB@consulintel.es> <2b01eb8f-d319-7d20-0f84-9a774f9e0e44@nostrum.com> <C01AE269-3168-4B6A-B8D8-D97230288302@gmail.com> <8161273d-97c2-2757-5f0c-6146d0b297aa@nostrum.com> <E51DA1A2-AB3E-42F7-BC0A-308BE6B58580@gmail.com> <2270ea7c-cd6d-c3d5-e768-6d1f0ae15605@nostrum.com> <216D2B11-5E07-4DBE-BCC4-0A8ABCCB15B7@gmail.com> <cf9ad015-ef7d-6e11-44e8-6a0fb5a78b91@gmail.com> <EBBFC64A-C730-47D8-8F66-E4C7773A0344@gmail.com> <D5E06CF1-9C2D-41BE-8635-1F73321986EC@consulintel.es> <CAG4d1rfvYrW5TDCzdUoFeeQFnsDejWFn7jH+20xnJ4QHEsJ=2g@mail.gmail.com> <F2144741-4441-4F6E-B91E-6AEB52BCA7CF@consulintel.es> <CAG4d1rdC2SBC6F4-8MJGsJBt7kbJ+kRA5MKC5ZVUyhjCUJLkCg@mail.gmail.com> <201BB54E-ECEF-46F3-BE79-FBDF12CAAD40@consulintel.es>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <72db82ac-e272-f269-f15e-0bcde9a1582e@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 18:14:24 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201BB54E-ECEF-46F3-BE79-FBDF12CAAD40@consulintel.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_QEfrGeSI7nEOiCEL4sF3hHzuJk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 02:14:53 -0000

On 5/24/16 2:20 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> I said this already a few messages ago. If instead of the IETF is a
> business meeting that your boss tell you need to go (at least in my
> country, and here comes what you said about different cultures), you
> will have no choice: a) Go there b) You’re fired, maybe unless a
> colleague can make it for you and your boss accept it But
> definitively, you will not be able to argue in front of a court to
> defend your job that you can’t go there because your family need to
> go there with you and that country don’t allow it.

Allow me to suggest that you know no such thing, and that
you're presenting a strawman argument that may, in fact,
be completely false.  US companies tend to come down on the
side of supporting diversity and rejecting bigotry - take
a look at the response to North Carolina's HB2.

It's fine to make conjectures, but please couch it in
terms of "I think this is what would happen."  I believe
that in this case you'd be incorrect.

Melinda