Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 24 May 2016 20:03 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D273B12D1AC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bI1AJrW0VQ0D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22a.google.com (mail-lf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 376D312D1A8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id e131so10356850lfb.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eLLiNVrpp/zwjdMYBCA0Aiw0On+TM6jmTT6QiaLBy4w=; b=Q6fPHNQIyyKlqdS4+kRSASNCNgduPHz20zh4VeFtzKWV2dFbd4laY5VSxbP9taQhim nmWO4BskMxasxHQ9TOcPT7nVINQYZ11cvyuEaqZjhWXKPMpMS3WA9Zgwwb8cdQIy26w1 1+gokRF2O4IONetg8elNvg43SPgEq9i+P4aQrvf7bLJBLOtZysvEulj4VddQU1GvDyx+ HF+YGFPKSV6gXEFKT+zH3FsU5EOF/jRk+Pg7AqtIWLYaCPpGfBytKxNokIImFUBj3YFf bv7QEtd5q/p/5na5Xa2i/SdkVNHkkHSHDGL9xs2TFUcH1MViSPb2flISygC2YKmS+742 ECPw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eLLiNVrpp/zwjdMYBCA0Aiw0On+TM6jmTT6QiaLBy4w=; b=iJpnLM96quIU1OUHaWrxtaCwdLqkY8tQ115h/ZDu0IqTicth+nj5m5w7uwGiSRvGBj WS/eFWyXcRjiSYidC5WVVH9eo6UxbZikZzIArTETxu0L7Ua/ri+5IY2SXHzoLcdFlsyr A7K30mD8134ykLm2iLqEdZNLtaY13WESvWNU0uLO0+F6y1f3pB+zRTdsRKcaAh6vGU6i rwp2f3ecyzewyUmsX0BqdDyaTk6BRJGENSancz3DdEsMibvN6L1/vOK9vwUveifmh1CF JWLvXzSlvsyvHcyDHG39TOEkJeihqqFk+f3SZVjWRByEP/UHk8SPFBJwTA7zHPWdBk/U BOPQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVB+ox0dTDnM8AACODSq4fPQEK02+c2F445TEGP/E0lXL7Z1BxdAXxVN48334iH7wY9EZqJwfsyucddxg==
X-Received: by 10.25.210.202 with SMTP id j193mr8177818lfg.139.1464120183429; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.153.135 with HTTP; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1revHP29U6uc4uUocUeL9vWSAPHd1_L-BVbBbAkKOd2-sg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <D3662363.190A96%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <CAHkmkwtEtDk4sPv3GjkrSFqOdRV3HBA5i2_uZu3X2D4RxSF4wA@mail.gmail.com> <2e95fd51-23b8-39e7-d4ca-a9fc9d49559c@gmail.com> <CAHkmkwsf3YfFfR7jUHYnaw6dCrasMOazjbXPJRRhZS28k8HV0w@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1605241405210.28372@uplift.swm.pp.se> <714DDDE2-562D-488A-AAAA-F8DE3C2CA97D@consulintel.es> <FE76F502-617E-4190-BFF5-649EC9CFECAC@consulintel.es> <CABcZeBMPAFdLwZTr7TCJC-tZ+X=CKGzQ7Jp0zqDO86PdPn6YvQ@mail.gmail.com> <8D82EA4F-1275-436C-8030-1E799F5D7F59@consulintel.es> <CABcZeBOCtk6JK_3w2_L87oyze+dfgy7fFyU7QrGmGgEtta1oZA@mail.gmail.com> <1CA535AB-CAC4-49CB-B094-AAA7FE3119FB@consulintel.es> <2b01eb8f-d319-7d20-0f84-9a774f9e0e44@nostrum.com> <C01AE269-3168-4B6A-B8D8-D97230288302@gmail.com> <8161273d-97c2-2757-5f0c-6146d0b297aa@nostrum.com> <E51DA1A2-AB3E-42F7-BC0A-308BE6B58580@gmail.com> <2270ea7c-cd6d-c3d5-e768-6d1f0ae15605@nostrum.com> <216D2B11-5E07-4DBE-BCC4-0A8ABCCB15B7@gmail.com> <cf9ad015-ef7d-6e11-44e8-6a0fb5a78b91@gmail.com> <EBBFC64A-C730-47D8-8F66-E4C7773A0344@gmail.com> <D5E06CF1-9C2D-41BE-8635-1F73321986EC@consulintel.es> <CAG4d1rfvYrW5TDCzdUoFeeQFnsDejWFn7jH+20xnJ4QHEsJ=2g@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1kG2_P5yBEOrajkNXZms438xRZuQTTcPnWnGDoqkYZCUQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAG4d1revHP29U6uc4uUocUeL9vWSAPHd1_L-BVbBbAkKOd2-sg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 16:02:23 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1nVH9J9CpWF5qYX7tWid84MHDSmqPuSnefKWqxrBFYHnw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11412a8871299905339c0b99
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/sFiDqURl5CnS2ag7vYBNRAJcKJM>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>, Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 20:03:10 -0000

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:

> There are certainly conferences that help by providing information about
> chlidcare (frequently available through the hotel or such) or even
> organizing joint childcare.  Strangely enough, that helps increase the
> participation of those with young children and childcare responsibilities
> (frequently women).  I am not requesting that the IAOC do so - though
> certainly gathering information about childcare one time for use by many
> would be helpful.
>

TBH, this seems much more generally useful to me than optimizing for the
case of bringing the family along as support for the same thing, which
seems like a fairly heavy lift for many likely IETF participants in
comparison.

The case of a nursing adoptive mother seems like a real corner case in the
sense that I am not aware of any countries the IETF is likely to ever go to
that would not recognize the nursing mother's parental rights.