Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Sat, 21 May 2016 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE67712D591 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 May 2016 11:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QkX29ej-dQ4o for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 May 2016 11:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x236.google.com (mail-pa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34ABC12D595 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 May 2016 11:33:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x236.google.com with SMTP id qo8so49785341pab.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 May 2016 11:33:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QTrzvGv2o1KM6ndlEsw/pcgQxxD/Xet6+JE84xc9X1I=; b=haMIFGWUs2iAq4RS/oeXDMuP20nysK9rCrtOQTcKFnzKPPADsoEhsAYxKZ7SfujpFA IEbxau4piYmIiL020mvOQHbRkSjVynUmkq/8KQbroxPW5rkO1gyzh38F8ZXbNIJw4Ri7 iUu/TNH5ksH+4T/JdoElg/FuDUollvagk28FYCLaptZKSdpcPreZWPpjdU5egPH5ulCn e4/0/cD/+BvSUdbE6vGyaHz329mIVYdEWS0eNQ+Y+0FT28EtXmLyWLcl7Wm76rHLBBKa lONND1d+3ps13N2WT1YNR0tpjSum3PvB2dgOfC2fyKWzei2qHL1FW134loMEE5UFuk/l Pflg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QTrzvGv2o1KM6ndlEsw/pcgQxxD/Xet6+JE84xc9X1I=; b=YhzPERPVB8ubvAv0/0pBRO1QB6oyJ2UraZ+gNmwParhHzbpTNVvvnla1ID6uf5DAfV FxuCCUA22ed9hB2317+umChS+GOVodzuhfFGKwiMXtUDoPIbIirmHmc5ZWR3kXnYFsCk ZO+1KxBYjsRzxd4jtbKiXA8C863CS6UFRvt/UTPEK1VZoZjmE3ycD1KGya0s9AU0DCQ5 1eLlvCm1snkxbSpaNqGwVhCl8qNZ+HvUWCYW5hwb6kl2+Zg26AdxPS2U4nZdndBD6ptA yif12M3l8n3YhXna2F7a0vVaZgTtsX7H2IXv5fU1mhFWsRwbpePjoa+vb4OcsBGgzIwG 2p9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLrZ2pTrRd/OWgBxtFpWHUnBI2yVrG8xaVk3RGe0xkixPA7T9B94FaUM3sgKCp5GA==
X-Received: by 10.67.7.3 with SMTP id cy3mr9016555pad.156.1463855617410; Sat, 21 May 2016 11:33:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local (63-140-98-2-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [63.140.98.2]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l67sm2827918pfi.10.2016.05.21.11.33.35 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 21 May 2016 11:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20160517181436.24852.58610.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <3945cc1f-3e99-0fcb-e983-ed2e46fa871c@nostrum.com> <CA+9kkMAWFQDrT6WqTGz=6LcDiBkg+iuLEuSzeSqfZA4-J-tvZg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMGpKFiA78iQDFa5xaM0r0q_3LfLO_JKxaWJ9CBUTeaLg@mail.gmail.com> <C5B9F952-FEFC-4B73-9AC6-E050F59A74CB@consulintel.es>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5740A90E.2030200@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 10:29:34 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C5B9F952-FEFC-4B73-9AC6-E050F59A74CB@consulintel.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/DcdnxkTfzakL9AOSdtXnd3NATq4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 18:33:42 -0000

On 5/21/16 10:14 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> What about announcing venues and cancelling because whatever
> circumstances?

Please don't do the slippery slope thing.  Seriously.
This is about a specific circumstance.

Also, understand that you're asking that GLBT people accept
different conditions for participating in an IETF meeting.  I
strongly agree that our top priority is, and has to remain,
getting work done.  But, for better or for worse, a lot of
participants bring their family members, and there are some
basic questions here about equal and unequal treatment, aside
from the potential safety issues.

Melinda