Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Wed, 25 May 2016 19:09 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282D412D8FE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2016 12:09:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TMFe25WH89_b for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2016 12:09:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22e.google.com (mail-pa0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C4A812D919 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 May 2016 12:09:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id fy7so3896728pac.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 May 2016 12:09:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9/wpS4q5mvy/n0oJRAB8+J/6mmwtIwh7afirnMihbBY=; b=t43obctTOndV2kqMLrZH+OwEWPuQfj2hSLG1pIYGyUOWflYY/qiRWlZE8kLVbOqmwj hznbDSI1TI1hl/bmx+xokKayuvn3TkwtSpw0yIAVtocXIVGbhvBekzrjzihJqvZ2+yHG qR6WBkcIb2NToY3T14NyGInDv2skRvW48xExuOknBy8p9zuGa91xxsYVfu/dkC5pH7t3 TsJ4Q06cFLjJT5qzS7YanCMWTtwqvBpw0JAy15xL3KTO1Cm5im6GMo8hMWCfxR2A2+Uw jbe04Y3DPRREBT44DmVNY/qVr9avy94BUDX6dDarlWdPt50SDG0ADOT/Gux51r2IcMQS 832Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9/wpS4q5mvy/n0oJRAB8+J/6mmwtIwh7afirnMihbBY=; b=HgELlxSrptGvk4o8/p6RuB17shi9ppZCcqUwkho24o90e6cV32RNgsqs/ZZzEErHff l7AoT1PPwEuzz6tvF0UH72bSllSeqqnr1RUD2c9RrgJwb+dBy0x13RK+oIXbTcMjKP72 i6bdQenbdPvtKaQDMGhCcnQTxJB4qSf5FSK/vSPhzbh62Dd7Ym2Gdtb41fMLHnYm8Dtm zgXO0CrvvgZCUK+D1FW9nNnmVdCtjVKhtqTNw8NsSVc5c2x1dgsHCZtYiQ8VwzgE7Ua5 SifOvcCdZH84CQ6DXa8CD2G9kEzuLy4HOGed49wzq/pH4aCjyrbCg1b5WBlJoNFJugxT jsJw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIezjzApMLQ67VAFXsA7MqSty86OK3lEbSnBcFtxVHfWWa+FJLHBEVuEdOBFGi8Lg==
X-Received: by 10.66.220.168 with SMTP id px8mr3191667pac.83.1464203340563; Wed, 25 May 2016 12:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local (63-140-104-230-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [63.140.104.230]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n66sm293787pfb.17.2016.05.25.12.08.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 25 May 2016 12:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
To: nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <20160524210344.64781.qmail@ary.lan> <5f7621d7-326d-3d94-0b78-5a463dd6c496@gmail.com> <1940321298.573455.1464202942241.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <08f1ee7c-eb15-77bf-9e7e-5a164e5a38f9@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 11:08:17 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1940321298.573455.1464202942241.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/EMpEQZbpt1L4vmkJBBB7hZCPZoY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 19:09:03 -0000

On 5/25/16 11:02 AM, nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com wrote:
> The question was not WHO to have at meetings.  (Although, WHERE often
> leads to WHO).

At some point we really need to have a discussion of diversity and
inclusion that isn't sidetracked.  I'm hopeful that people who are
not interested in that will have the discipline not to try to
derail the discussion.

Melinda