Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

<nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com> Wed, 25 May 2016 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE09412D834 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2016 08:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LjhV4SbE-M6i for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2016 08:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm42-vm7.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm42-vm7.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.121.63]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E939C12DBFE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 May 2016 08:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1464189698; bh=JlekCJvovXXhKSvZ3718mG5GawiP5vAsnRJDaL6XtM4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=mDjle97Bqt0tPo6M3vtE/cWVQg0F1SXVukh/7tq3YL8cXXMh7FfGkr+EmmX+lacL0p4CR1rGp99Qpc5ZCRcKh3ge6nvOzyqYh5BcxLlF4hBXEnJEAVEdiL9EQdpvhYZCqzaGCdlRcGU5JkcyKviq/ILzGfCq2ZSIFGQsZuhRdhABngp0xtfpPydJzPiPyReUj6WxYaoHm559SPS/cXI2c3xQWFHtiGZF2X2waCLOBu6uoeNK1IdIc6YBwE0HvIdvyl08E4YwlMlg21njbbUPBfbsysT+jJd314+qGdogXYClFSe8la+icjjasLGO4yaCwbxFvZCZURpr0u8eBiqkuw==
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by nm42.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 May 2016 15:21:38 -0000
Received: from [98.138.101.130] by nm42.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 May 2016 15:18:39 -0000
Received: from [98.138.89.199] by tm18.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 May 2016 15:18:39 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1057.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 May 2016 15:18:39 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-4
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 198732.79092.bm@omp1057.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
X-YMail-OSG: w9V_dKsVM1kno.447bGTTjGbS0o4t7H0WdPydGu1GjPONqK0RZFx77LKlX6m.WP J4MamqhWlaITfsjFfF5jiovGhtGAr1EFZlpFIQiZ3VMzmCaGK7q_KvkDiHpkByDb8lYZn5kpBOFZ 6jknMUuT_AOdWiW3voMPZ6xwN56gJ1Fq5vtyTWuTFVH9vfM6AecDXwfYN_NANVAq34nzOHdxx_7D UaYltVGM7k8S5WjAfeG3NC9xZLbXS_sSkw0HN7Mg7jxQTnoPhxHCwhiw17GcO8OARvL._9OvVMGS X9tlUhkddUP53RCoDuieLbEZFY1NF2H2Y8Y2HDLKWzgqcY614H9WG8LMbhkt6gZH7Y8aPooyiNQa xBo4EzmBC2GUbUqjUWUI24jHkQhXxoaUPV_w51EDXwtonegCA5o0SyQiKGLBIDK6L3iJiQx2h.dr eSF5YGj8Ad9dK6QESrTMTrY9seisMK_p9gmQETLVL1qlBtuu2IpWyk5Lhb3vAL19c7lqRZM4NyJD 2WsH4xSHwBw3WOm1sRl9JujUQZ7OzeV2M0QZ_2OWmCf8bReay0KVAxN8AM8ws6JSmrABBcuJNfF5 USPycbRP6iAPTAIhsY_U-
Received: from jws10023.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sendmailws128.mail.ne1.yahoo.com; Wed, 25 May 2016 15:18:38 +0000; 1464189518.743
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 15:18:38 +0000 (UTC)
From: <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>, Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com>
Message-ID: <270093544.407294.1464189518299.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <439c30dc-3d3c-e6e3-43f2-812a66496379@gmail.com>
References: <20160524210344.64781.qmail@ary.lan> <bd1f61ef-3be2-1a16-804c-68548df0b789@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1605242300120.194@rabdullah.local> <da508fd5-307c-c61e-5b72-185238414a9c@gmail.com> <1936013436.371962.1464185835726.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <439c30dc-3d3c-e6e3-43f2-812a66496379@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_407293_2035327773.1464189518296"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Q3S-ihol4Wvuu0rfP91qXQrmUec>
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 15:24:13 -0000



>>On 5/25/16 6:17 AM, nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com wrote:
>> So, it is not OK to put an additional burden sometimes on GLBT people
>> but it is OK to put an additional burden on Asian and African and
>> other people as far as cost, racism, visa, etc, etc?

>Perhaps we should regard this as an opportunity to talk
>about which forms of bigotry we'll accommodate and which
>we won't.
Well said.

Nalini