Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 23 May 2016 08:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 174D812D66D; Mon, 23 May 2016 01:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gqo2lo4jZs3h; Mon, 23 May 2016 01:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com (mail-oi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7317412D66E; Mon, 23 May 2016 01:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x235.google.com with SMTP id b65so122585781oia.1; Mon, 23 May 2016 01:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9NQzfys2RulSEncwSXRNL1tC+WfjKn7che27b11SAI8=; b=T7xOtLUAqGIUneqHbTEShrIPvrqhPg6dmN7pXa/QAG5K86C4/Zbzh0n5RqIBv66//s eTXSwGk/20HlJD0JHX5AH3OwXP1qHfhLWP/IHI6yRFVDVbTKWRq84RoxLaBAotF7wS7D a2okFBpUASCJCBqzLOTLB1TR4yHPk69fC0nUNR+udkfveWme7DPbAKtNzaRWBEh3utZQ 9bnKgVYUUplbRfngig2yQWkWZbLKcOPlqE1wE5g4hOB0m6ix7cPcEC5M5VbGjtDOWbZh LV03oHgiW1PxfAc9pmEM+4kWuke6zVe9p4dYQKw+GUrfoJTdB7G27SRXHt/N6kDa5bhL l0WA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9NQzfys2RulSEncwSXRNL1tC+WfjKn7che27b11SAI8=; b=lG4p5gweyC3UL35Ly63rS4empQUL64h9At4o62essZmSmnQ2zWd+2HqIaw3+kD/Fn9 7YGFh4X/xc09KJNI4rV0gr2N2ink+Ezk0mOJ7LStLF4m3ttZ0LO1oaEgmdbUUYQB0fTB nDc/gdEl9P+Od8u8+I8G87p4ytW+g6zPepJsTHPRy+DCPDm5+uzv5R60EEY/WTCmLjxI 147EucnqjUx90ZaFCcYhaXKts0a5ofhyuqT/CzyKBViINmAvo3DgKd+OxQsePnR64QNm 5OxSWhxPoDXREdO7DJU8eRtm3/D/SliietYguI2BupdIo03YL8exa+a1p8CORP+SwmcX ZMFw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKD15joB+o9E6yzy2uA4mLaB6UqykfekoWWL7ykzX8c2KbkVhWXmUGPxDevuBMDVnIU6EEEU0o4nmBXGg==
X-Received: by 10.157.50.138 with SMTP id u10mr3234431otb.40.1463992800817; Mon, 23 May 2016 01:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.195.137 with HTTP; Mon, 23 May 2016 01:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1605221149050.29560@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <20160517181436.24852.58610.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <3945cc1f-3e99-0fcb-e983-ed2e46fa871c@nostrum.com> <CA+9kkMAWFQDrT6WqTGz=6LcDiBkg+iuLEuSzeSqfZA4-J-tvZg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1605211237470.6270@bofh.nohats.ca> <CA+9kkMB5cSG01tgxA+==db1TmZwN0uY8tXtJ+Q3Rm0VUpHcUuA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1605221149050.29560@bofh.nohats.ca>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 04:39:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMAz88U9ESN0zy9fNt_VVfpNvjB5fEB69YLPXCf8fuZodQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11493c2cd8b7a305337e62e4
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/EYpM6ytzwT8i-Hx2IPdcA6KiBTY>
Cc: venue-selection@ietf.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 08:40:03 -0000

On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:

On Sun, 22 May 2016, Ted Hardie wrote:
>
> I strongly disagree. It is not about novelty at all. It is about
> being local to more people who otherwise cannot attend. Look at our
> last meeting, which was a first in South America. The number of South
> American participants was very high, and full of first time attendees.
>
> I think we're talking about two different levels here.  If we wish to
reach out to a new area, we should find the accommodation in that area that
is best for our principles.  Once that is done, we do not need to move
within that territory simply for the movements sake. If Argentina works, we
do not have to also go to a neighboring country that matches the principles
less well, simply to move around.

Neighboring country is, unfortunately, a pretty airy concept, for which I
apologize.  At the moment our policy is written in terms of very, very
large regions, and it may well be that some change there may help clarify
when a move accomplishes some regional fairness and is not simply a
consequence of other forces.

regards,

Ted