Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Wed, 25 May 2016 20:14 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F18812DC45 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2016 13:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bkKCL1IbJCgj for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2016 13:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22f.google.com (mail-pa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9994312DC32 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 May 2016 13:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id eu11so11671697pad.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 May 2016 13:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VJF1UtcuxxbtpI1620k3IWJxQ61AR+VHx7pXEq5+naA=; b=Pjud7LMkh6pPxRiS3Iibb+FvAL5DoF+uYtBZsM0gryF+EST6W3g3ocf8HJTnZ5Kf0T DqtUJSwh72/9uR7NpMrMuZk+h+SoZM4al+Op21KifB7Djh6t41UxvGacciyDJGDMolMU APV2xWqVsI+slenL8+5wGBD0fwLFp1jv9NhK+2BG4Es7SDu4pFb8BsUJaAsXIA9V0xoJ 1IBW5amFuJ8IfthtS1Pb6oTVwsRxSkpgnPhMQjZXt/WHkPHkgX0rBDtw4lEpb+7lr6fg w2x7aij2YY+apCwTw1ippQT+efZjRQl5s1hcuUDVUmTKPFyLka/pSG7KPBvYIevZJ9F4 0iTg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VJF1UtcuxxbtpI1620k3IWJxQ61AR+VHx7pXEq5+naA=; b=BEAGLNSP2QgErX9ExsKc6PUzhREp5qQcqwssN0Qq1VdoRgr4om5ESdU6KsJi9e2B/O XE2iy1GF50uEDOm5zWiHO+qqu8Z7QfuvjHW/MQypRgHIACGHKo8L0p+jlRKBB6VMrRkg tXpF/sW+NJkR2zNcZgZq8IA2yLsB0N0aKaDtGDezfPdJO/Tk5S0a9UQSaa++W37ntlEk EyxGNZ3WIWXlo/NAnX1pxA2mfqagvGlASfGwdu9ze9k48Ykr13H0Z62XfjIXGl+B1RdQ jZtV1yVWzi6C++VXDoxldu9vT7cPPkjXyIkSFtVZTi9vEO+cwwuNz/DYfB8OCamxsmps yeIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIqDHQ5nrPkAGdJ+WyGR4W0Hoeu9+fK3sgT1+jKOaHI7TRH7Oph4b5uqfTHHma+sQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.11.67 with SMTP id o3mr1167316pab.95.1464207248149; Wed, 25 May 2016 13:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local (63-140-104-230-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [63.140.104.230]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t65sm463361pfb.37.2016.05.25.13.14.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 25 May 2016 13:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
References: <20160524210344.64781.qmail@ary.lan> <5f7621d7-326d-3d94-0b78-5a463dd6c496@gmail.com> <1940321298.573455.1464202942241.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <08f1ee7c-eb15-77bf-9e7e-5a164e5a38f9@gmail.com> <CAPt1N1mOMf9u+CXwhrjtD9R7FJOq1=6N+T3zHKJHVfSdy0t_Uw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d33789e4-caf5-21be-e4b1-a7d3065d43fe@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 12:13:22 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1mOMf9u+CXwhrjtD9R7FJOq1=6N+T3zHKJHVfSdy0t_Uw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0OeYZI3jMNbRDVO5bWCy0gb04qc>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 20:14:11 -0000

On 5/25/16 11:39 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> It appears that you and Ted do not believe that that is the right
> question.   I think it is plain why you think that it is not the right
> question.   However, by changing the topic, you are asserting that your
> belief about what the right question is is more important than either
> the IAOC's beliefs or the beliefs of other IETFers who believe that it
> was a reasonable question.

I absolutely don't think "Can we have a successful meeting in
Singapore" is the right question.  "We" can have a very
successful meeting, depending on the value of "we."

So, when we talk about "we," who's included?

Melinda