Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 25 May 2016 20:51 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126F612DD77 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2016 13:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wUPB54H9f-Yp for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2016 13:51:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF0CE12DD65 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 May 2016 13:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2469; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1464209447; x=1465419047; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Ysm3x2LFLRIwUaXrjBwN8N5puu58BxNmDFjUU1iuBPk=; b=ZtpevU6YnTt94FKLzS3dop3HMmFM2kL6BCsrpklUFvjwY1ywwxOh/3hU /qGaIwX43ExUiNkp/asA7/54wb6qbeJ0hawV2Mb3jrtYJ0yHzZL/73CTN ctgeg75rjxebYncq7va5NyEtx1t5VyN/BdBy9cbjj+xxOZHywVfI5eX4s A=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CqBACQD0ZX/xbLJq1chDi4PIQVhhECg?= =?us-ascii?q?X8RAQEBAQEBAWUnhEQBAQQjUAYQCxgqAgJXBgEMCAEBiCuxVpFHAQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQEBAQEBARAOiB2CVoEiF4YHglkBBJg3gyuBaIkNgVOHboVbj0w2LIITg?= =?us-ascii?q?Vw6ijkBAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,365,1459814400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="634821547"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 May 2016 20:50:24 +0000
Received: from [10.61.105.212] (dhcp-10-61-105-212.cisco.com [10.61.105.212]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u4PKoNtc023108; Wed, 25 May 2016 20:50:23 GMT
Subject: Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
References: <20160524210344.64781.qmail@ary.lan> <5f7621d7-326d-3d94-0b78-5a463dd6c496@gmail.com> <1940321298.573455.1464202942241.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <08f1ee7c-eb15-77bf-9e7e-5a164e5a38f9@gmail.com> <CAPt1N1mOMf9u+CXwhrjtD9R7FJOq1=6N+T3zHKJHVfSdy0t_Uw@mail.gmail.com> <d33789e4-caf5-21be-e4b1-a7d3065d43fe@gmail.com> <CAPt1N1mhK=p1YboDnKE5xF+gdMdXkOZBqbpaodkaq8jR0Lophw@mail.gmail.com> <75ca0a38-0807-a91f-5b2a-bab8f6fc7042@gmail.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <e9264cc0-ecaf-ad6b-3e70-e249303664c9@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 22:50:23 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <75ca0a38-0807-a91f-5b2a-bab8f6fc7042@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VHsk57JEm0INskLJpL8LBbVvKom4k8DjG"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0pN2VKiNBLlNSH2ItU-d-AJtkO4>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 20:51:01 -0000


On 5/25/16 10:44 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:
> On 5/25/16 12:36 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>> It's probably easier to enumerate who's excluded than who's included:
>
> No, it's still not really working.
>
> Would we, for example, be willing to meet in a place that
> criminalizes Muslims or Jews or Hindus?  I sincerely hope not,
> and I don't think that we would.

Criminalizes?  Probably not.  Makes it difficult for them to adhere to
the precepts of their religion?  We've already done that (perhaps some
of it is unavoidable, by the way).

Eliot