Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]

<> Tue, 24 May 2016 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E121212D7BB for <>; Tue, 24 May 2016 07:08:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZU_X2Ak-i4Mi for <>; Tue, 24 May 2016 07:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0065212D7CB for <>; Tue, 24 May 2016 07:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=s2048; t=1464098877; bh=F0yYWc+VT/xRkYmkzznsvRnNiMPnlWVOBzU0RoBY++U=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=V9hkHbMPU0hKG5ZY6+EBJXLHMjywR64B3JLuRGMOypZ7x53P+U/i2t+Zdp0er7foIBIJlSpYAaNYK4Qda24GJF3hnYVR0Y3yowYpecIGP8Av9u2V6JYMLbvFR8ORt5V/Bo4MH/dzzAOCRbWQEkqYxaTR30XBXcN9WaVwNNubPiBIBOGBfqzSx/LuSul8/0ImsQOvKnjhYjepBxTqiPUqdMvxtPXeCfUXKvocV4ApebB2u069p4fETUy+KNQy0IvY1ObYUPyQlGtwR9HzvGDleMjTCwDLkYGHWi9vPeyAiFflCbOM4VT9Ys0SKzssB+ySlFKmda3e6qi/5u1u1uDt/A==
Received: from [] by with NNFMP; 24 May 2016 14:07:57 -0000
Received: from [] by with NNFMP; 24 May 2016 14:04:57 -0000
Received: from [] by with NNFMP; 24 May 2016 14:04:57 -0000
Received: from [] by with NNFMP; 24 May 2016 14:04:57 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-4
X-YMail-OSG: 7qbLOmQVM1mABdZmcw8bXPIMkNPo9TZb6xTK6wUf4qukT.fNdRoiaYC0LmtD_pa _yuEjvKSCG3HbXVKjnyyLmuKrQKUhCFu2gkgPkTQHqPa.WwrMobY5Zs0_uF7zhW_M6ZgZsrkSLcu PEt.j2oy8y4MOdzBUOI5mQiNfOByMU85xLyZIT1isbrix5vNTV87cHARXQSplNLNSQ6bRfB7E9_h N9MTo6Bek9UG3mXYXONpBTESjAEXBLTeG1m0GG3mJL0fIenmcyP8Bh5_mAffGYiaQ8EQJWbAMa04 Oj42rz5lp6RTV_7WcgP5HbtltB.6d6CJQmN3WBA5S_hJylpX3bHnV9ETUbqWSYKTP4Tmb4yxCdTN ZasTX4KE3guLVjGKK8OTeXRwzlshJcEiieou7KCQQpObml7zA0Pans3FeDc0m4Jn.rLWpYdpbYtD 3jFzLdNfhS45yNWo0CM4_WgFu9V7onGPU.ZtUdoy3LcPC4NdhRH2CA_B13a4C5sEePlPyI0LNo33 c8Spb1RfVjJw36lUio4TsqOrMrYUpUtK3tw--
Received: from by; Tue, 24 May 2016 14:04:57 +0000; 1464098697.094
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 14:04:56 +0000
To: "" <>
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <0c9401d1b53a$8f12f550$ad38dff0$> <> <> <>
Subject: Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1466206_62333520.1464098696600"
Archived-At: <>
Cc: Fred Baker <>, "" <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 14:08:03 -0000


>>> Our "remote meeting" efforts address the participation in discussions, but
>>> they are still a bit dry. We do have mentoring efforts, but they seem to
>>> only happen during meetings.  
>>Just FYI, we have remote mentoring Proof of Concept started with Internet Draft Review Teams.  I know we will have some false starts but I have great hopes for this initiative. Quite >>few teams are forming.
>>I see people from Latin America helping people in China and India.  I, myself, will be doing a webcast with India and Singapore later this week.
>>We need to figure out what works and what does not before scaling this initiative.  This type of mentoring will be all year round and not tied to meetings.

>From my own experience mentoring, structure and setting expectations for both the mentee and mentor are critical.  I don't think these guidelines have been used yet, but they have >helped other programs build successful mentor relationships:
>- mentee is expected to schedule each meeting>- mentee is expected to come ready with a set of questions and objectives for each meeting>- mentee should provide follow up with results from advice or discussion
>These guidelines apply for remote or face to face and should be pretty obvious how they help both sides, so I won't get into that
Kathleen, thank you for your comments.  We are working with both mentors and mentees to help them work with each other and build successful teams.  We are also growing the Mentoring Team.  Much discussion is being had behind the scenes.
To the community: the mentoring team REALLY appreciates your support and patience while we build the program and work out the kinks in the system.   We will be having a session from Mentoring on Internet Draft Review Teams at IETF96 as well as Mentor / Mentee Feedback session as always.  I urge anyone interested to attend and give us feedback or see what is going on.  You can also find me in hallways, etc at IETF96.   This is all very exciting.

I also appreciate your patience if the first few times, the posting to the WG email lists by review teams could be better.  It will happen.  This is a Work-in-progress.  If anyone wants to help in any way, please email me unicast.
Thanks again, Kathleen.  I appreciate you taking the time to think about this issue.