Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 25 May 2016 00:09 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9483C12D8D5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 17:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KSs-3YGsp3of for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 17:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x233.google.com (mail-lb0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8BB212D718 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 17:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-x233.google.com with SMTP id k7so10506262lbm.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 17:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tbCDmN3UhSjBY2Ook7Tc0yrV4vGmNrNMHoYFkBLzsI4=; b=DdUkFdP/rjaAPslJz3IJLZ8YRfpC7lXkoG56+TQOeQBGIFvnwlYoZxsDK/9s+X+A3O +icywgx878IqX+xtW8QUa94G4c/Z7bhdDW4naxAbZLYbNuCKvG3R5a2KfIEFrxs/QclT 3YdvW1KKz/IUmQqTogQRicAyoq73cx2CSku6+cTmCoPBajpfYJHPWzfHl+aXsQLgKpjN nyyBohFfcpB7gE4/9v/SHgAuVGqQWvW0EniGflSM8DnokSBlQkzpgXmZ5V5wslSmtm5H fenNmWYzTyb9SaZYVjTSb7Nj+HL6IfzplZ+Yrry8zcaPLVUt4LdtcIHPOlWJ98bF+dFq Pheg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tbCDmN3UhSjBY2Ook7Tc0yrV4vGmNrNMHoYFkBLzsI4=; b=XBGmWqrvkq7/eKOsNcIMBB29YiCG1q/ujW9HZ3umdsgtSFa3g4EQE6yqv5i53OsXMv pzYbDWvPpEW2cRZF1ytzuxvOb0STjkUA8VIFKIOfECiB3eUEJmYZkxA0/s7rdtQZtmXM uLkdRuHkfWu07rpeLj9APUV3lLXPPogaa/pV69Rwd922wjte0vuKgjD9gjoCRlUPo5kd FTvWAy3bSIH45eksB8Vc65dz29iBNwoyDDjDHup8LA0Piwn20Wyzw9oeRxRa3ZnLvhBb K2c2VI9LD+Afg58b5pzpUP20N0xE7zcBTln9yQlCCjUKHFtey4Fh6nYDlrhz5ZI5Z7E5 mjiw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJlre2l1twLf82kmMI/vdAUvJgBu6dDXvjgC4WVAZcNQeHZy9ycuQ+iVLN9XL/edC+6XCKJboaMcwa24w==
X-Received: by 10.112.33.104 with SMTP id q8mr241753lbi.78.1464134973092; Tue, 24 May 2016 17:09:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.153.135 with HTTP; Tue, 24 May 2016 17:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4A7BC91B-ACA6-4FE0-9684-126EE46C2197@gmail.com>
References: <D3662363.190A96%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <FE76F502-617E-4190-BFF5-649EC9CFECAC@consulintel.es> <CABcZeBMPAFdLwZTr7TCJC-tZ+X=CKGzQ7Jp0zqDO86PdPn6YvQ@mail.gmail.com> <8D82EA4F-1275-436C-8030-1E799F5D7F59@consulintel.es> <CABcZeBOCtk6JK_3w2_L87oyze+dfgy7fFyU7QrGmGgEtta1oZA@mail.gmail.com> <1CA535AB-CAC4-49CB-B094-AAA7FE3119FB@consulintel.es> <2b01eb8f-d319-7d20-0f84-9a774f9e0e44@nostrum.com> <C01AE269-3168-4B6A-B8D8-D97230288302@gmail.com> <8161273d-97c2-2757-5f0c-6146d0b297aa@nostrum.com> <E51DA1A2-AB3E-42F7-BC0A-308BE6B58580@gmail.com> <2270ea7c-cd6d-c3d5-e768-6d1f0ae15605@nostrum.com> <216D2B11-5E07-4DBE-BCC4-0A8ABCCB15B7@gmail.com> <cf9ad015-ef7d-6e11-44e8-6a0fb5a78b91@gmail.com> <EBBFC64A-C730-47D8-8F66-E4C7773A0344@gmail.com> <D5E06CF1-9C2D-41BE-8635-1F73321986EC@consulintel.es> <CAG4d1rfvYrW5TDCzdUoFeeQFnsDejWFn7jH+20xnJ4QHEsJ=2g@mail.gmail.com> <F2144741-4441-4F6E-B91E-6AEB52BCA7CF@consulintel.es> <CAG4d1rdC2SBC6F4-8MJGsJBt7kbJ+kRA5MKC5ZVUyhjCUJLkCg@mail.gmail.com> <5744D92D.7040208@cs.tcd.ie> <4A7BC91B-ACA6-4FE0-9684-126EE46C2197@gmail.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 20:08:53 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1kNrBC_FA89281DrJzm=WQCYWcdEAoz6Rbcy5iFXyc0Uw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
To: Margaret Cullen <margaretw42@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9473583f9879105339f7cd3
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/QP1oRBClSd8Qg9qjhlmL9b7gAdk>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 00:09:36 -0000

Margaret, this is a really hard issue to talk about, and I've probably made
a hash of it and offended everybody, for which I am sorry.   But the reason
I went a bit Sea Lion on it is that I am having trouble articulating a
principle that differentiates this particular governmental human rights
abuse, of which one recent example exists, from various other government
abuses committed by governments of countries in which we do not consider it
problematic to hold future IETF meetings.